10 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      
Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?
government

More difficulties with mergers and consolidation

by: Jason Springer

Mon Nov 09, 2009 at 03:15:00 PM EST

Anyone who still thinks it's going to be easy as a talking point to fix New Jersey's problems should take a look at a few recent examples to see the roadblocks along the way. First let's look at the proposed merger between Sussex Borough and Wantage, which was voted down last week 3-1:
The consolidation seemed to make sense: The towns already share three regional schools, a construction department and a court system and, served by the State Police, wouldn't have to quibble over police. Plus, the towns had assets (land and utilities) to share. In an unsettling economy, when cutting property taxes is the driving political issue, this one seemed like a rural no-brainer.
They're actually much further along in the process of working together and sharing services than many other towns, but they still said no, despite the projected savings:
According to the Consolidation Study Commission report, the towns - if they merged - could have saved $585,000 in the first year. Future savings could have been greater with even more cost-cutting. That's a nice chunk of change, but it wasn't enough to persuade residents to erase a border - especially those in Sussex Borough, population 2,000.
It will remain to be seen if a Christie administration will force these consolidations, but something is going to have to give because this happens all over the state.  Some of the smaller towns feel like they will lose their identity and be swallowed up by the larger town, while the savings are not really worth it.  So they're will to pay a little more to keep their Home Rule. Lets look at the recent consideration given to merging just police services in Medford and Medford Lakes:
The budget for the Medford Lakes Police Department is approximately $1.1 million dollars. A consolidation study indicated that Medford Township police officers could provide services for roughly $600,000.

Ten years from now, Medford Lakes predicts its police budget would be approximately $2 million dollars. The study indicated that Medford Township police could provide services for roughly $700,000.

The savings to residents would equate to roughly $1.3 million dollars.

But despite the proposed savings, Medford Lakes council decided the residents wanted to "keep our cops" and voted down the proposal. They didn't even put it to the voters before putting an end to the year long plan and proposed savings. As the Courier Post put it:
We complain of high property taxes...yet balk at any real opportunity to shrink the government's size and cost.
If we're not going to consolidate and merge towns, at least a step in the right direction would be to start with bulk purchasing for better rates. It's not just towns, we have commissions and authorities with bonding power, local school boards, regional school boards, county government, state government and more.

Of course erasing borders and overcoming the feeling that smaller towns are losing their autonomy as they perceive it will be more difficult, but if we don't start taking steps in the right direction we're not going to be walking at all. And we can't afford to stand still anymore.  

Discuss :: (11 Comments)
A Child's Stigma

[ADVERTISEMENT]

Politics As Usual in Ocean County

by: watcher

Mon Feb 16, 2009 at 01:52:38 PM EST

It is possible...just possible, mind you, that our elected officials in the Republican controlled County government just don't get it; that they actually believe the old adage "If you say it often enough, people will believe you forever."

It is more probable, however, that the other old saying "Absolute power corrupts absolutely" is more appropriate.

Take for example, the campaign last year for Ocean County Clerk:  Jason Verano, the Democratic candidate alleged, that the incumbent Republican had misappropriated funds from a Dedicated Trust Fund under his control; that he had used the money for expensive trips; promotional items, and a 42? plasma TV, among other things.

"No, no, no," the incumbent said during the campaign,  "I wouldn't do anything like that!  Using the taxpayer money from the Dedicated Trust Fund for these expenses was completely legal! Please, believe me."

And, so, the voters of Ocean County did and reelected him, although by a margin almost 2/3 less than the one he had in his first election.

Then, after his swearing in, when he told us that Jason Varano was right; that he had misused the Dedicated Trust Fund money, Ocean County voters learned that he had abused our trust; that he had used our natural desire to believe our leaders for his own self-serving purposes.  "I've changed the way the Dedicated Trust will be used.  Trust me." he said.

Huh?  What about the hundreds of thousands of dollars this official now admits he misappropriated?  How do we, the taxpayers, recoup our money?

Hey, Watcher has an idea: How about he donates his salary back to the county until the debt to the rest of us is paid back?  That would work for Watcher.  How about all of you?  We could even have a public ceremony showing him handing over his $10,000 monthly salary check.  By my calculation, it would only take 2-1/2 years for him to pay back all the money that he used improperly.

Well, we know that won't happen, unfortunately, and that is why Watcher will be watching everything that happens in our government; tracking every expense; examining every contract and cross-checking them with every contribution to the party and telling you what our elected officials won't tell you.

Ocean County residents have the right to the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about our government and those who hold the power to spend out money.  We have the right to transparency about every action our elected officials take, every penny of taxpayer money they spend; and every benefit they receive.

To paraphrase the famous line from the movie "Network", "We're getting mad as hell and we're not going to take it anymore"

Discuss :: (2 Comments)

Speaking Up

by: carolh

Thu Sep 27, 2007 at 12:47:15 PM EDT

I have been listening to the whole story about the Move on ad with half an ear this week.  Because I am living in my own private hell regarding government and the press on the Municipal level. 

Being an engineer, not a politician I tend to speak up.  Now, as you all know, that tends to get me in hot water frequently with the power players.  Part of me thinks I landed in this position as a councilwoman because I speak up and God finally found a niche for the troublemaking Muckraker in me.  It ain't easy, though, I gotta tell ya.  When you speak up - you have to be prepared to take the heat, because there will be heat.  There always is.  The hard part is to stand your ground even when you know you practically need body armor to walk in that room and defend your position. 

When you tell another politician looking only to his fame and legacy that his law has a few flaws and needs a little work, be prepared to be treated like you've just told someone their baby is ugly.  In the past few months I have been having my own private little struggle with the power elite in my own Borough.  Why?  It all started with a newpaper article.  Not even an ad.  Just an article and a favorable one at that. 

I had discovered that the actual mathematical equations used to calculate Floor Area Ratio in Tenafly were incorrect and broke down in some zones.  And so I came up with a mathematical solution to fix them.  It worked in every zone, in the entire town on a sliding scale and used only one simple equation rather than three different methods per zone like the Planning Board (actually they made the zoning officer come up with the calcs)  had come up with the year before.

I had just taken a good look at their baby - the one that the current Mayor had pinned all his hopes on to get re-elected.  I had just told them in no uncertain terms that their baby was ugly. 

When I realized I had found the solution that had eluded Tenafly for 20 years, I asked that it be put on the agenda so I could give a presentation to the Planning Board about the new method. 

Silly little naive Carol.  I assumed that confronted with the FACTS, the Planning Board would be thrilled we now had a way forward that the public would be happy with.  Unfortunately, newspapers do funny things to politicians.  The local reporter called me as he usually does about issues in town.  I explained the new method to him so that he would understand it when it was presented at the meeting and that he could educate the public about it so they could ask educated questions. 

Not only did the Chairman and several other members of the Planning Board read the paper that day.  They had cut out the article and highlighted certain passages and had it sitting prominently in front of them during the meeting.  In fact, they read it a lot more carefully than all the Excel spreadsheets I had made to show them exactly where the previously proposed equations did not work.  And so what started as a positive meeting where I hoped to share a success with the Planning Board, turned into a lynching.  And guess who they wanted to hang.  I was later told, that never in his career had the reporter seen a councilmember so badly treated.  In fact, while attempting to give my presentation, I was repeatedly interrupted by the Chairman and not allowed to continue.  He tried to pull a Closed Session while fixing me with the absolute most withering stare.  The reporter, thankfully was the only public person in the entire room and stood up to say that calling the Closed Session was illegal. 

At that point, realizing I was getting nowhere, and that the Chairman had crossed the line, I stood up and leaving my presentation materials behind, I simply walked out.  Not only did the meeting make it into the next paper, but an editorial too, about the Sunshine laws and how what the Chairman had tried to do was reprehensible. 

(The only funny part of this story is that after that meeting, I went to Borders and bought Robert's Rules for Dummies so I could see just where things went wrong.  Turns out, Roberts Rules was written by a Civil Engineer in the 1800's after a really bad presentation like the kind I just experienced.  Guess I'm not the only one this happened to.  I recommend to anyone considering public office - you have to know the rules - it WILL help you. )

I was being harassed and told to be quiet by people who are simply in love with the IDEA of being on the Planning Board, without an understanding of the actual issues involved.  One longstanding member was angry at me for using the term buidling footprint, because he did not know what it meant.  The Chairman himself once asked me what a driveway apron was.  I was stunned and dumbfounded.  What do you do when the Planning Board members are more woirried about who gets more press, or what is in the paper than about how much we accomplish? 

The article was favorable and made Tenafly look good.  The fact that I had a solution was a positive.  Yet they were angry.  Why? They did not want me to speak to the press.  After I left the meeting, I was told, they gave my materials to the Borough Engineer and told him to use them and come back with a new ordinance, so that they could "get the credit".  This is how petty and small some of those involved in government get.  They are more worried about press than policy. 

The Republicans are freaked out after pinning all their hopes on this one military man - Patreus that they can't deal with any bad press.  They put all their eggs in one basket - the PERCEPTION of accomplishments that they care not for actual progress in policy.  I am dealing with this craziness on a tiny level and a safer one, but the craziness is there all the same.  A sane person would think - they are upset about an AD????  They shouldn't be wasting valuable time discussing an ARTICLE or an AD. They should spend time getting results.

Ego, PR, and perception.  I can't make any other sense out of it. 

In Tenafly the hardest part of my Council term so far has been fighting the class issue.  Before it was known I lived in a 4 family house - the other members of the Planning Board would whisper to me on the side during meetings when they assumed- as an engineer that I was on their economic level.  They had no knowledge of my medical expenses or my lifestyle.  I won this election on my engineering skills but my apartment is modest at best.  The Board has been trying to get rid of 2 family houses at the Mayor's request - another issue he is running for re-election on. 

The thing is,  nearly all my neighbors live in two family homes.  The Mayor lives on the East Hill with a pool and tennis court.  He has absolutely no clue who lives in my neighborhood.  And yet every chance he gets he is decrying the proliferation of 2 family homes in MY neighborhood.  He and the other member of the Planning Board who is extremely wealthy and lives on the East Hill.  I try to speak up for my neighbors, many of whom have been here for decades, and it is getting me in deeper hot water.  The Planning Board attempted to pass a new law outlawing 2 family homes in most of the town, but the map did not include homes like my rented apartment - a 4 family.  When I pointed this out and the Council would not pass the ordinance and another article was written in the paper making the Mayor look elitist simply by quoting him accurately, I was again the target of the wrath of the Planning Board Chairman, (who prefers to hypenate his first name - James-Robert - who does that? - One of these days I'll slip and accidentally call him Jim-Bob) except this last time there was no one present from the public or the press to witness the abuse.  He accused me of thwarting the Planning Board for political reasons and he actually sneered that I was catering to MY constituents. 

As elected officials, we are the ones accountable to the public, not political appointees.  I have to speak up for ALL the residents in town - not just those on the East Hill who think the town would be just great if it weren't for all "those people" who live on my side of the tracks.  I have to tell you, sometimes I just want to give up, these folks look at me like I'm a bug now that they know where I live.  But, I am going to try to keep speaking up, because I can't let them waste taxpayers money and time on foolishness like who gets more press or what ad made them look foolish.  Their goal may be to feel important at the country club, but my goal is to get things done.  Besides, I can't afford the country club dues and I don't play golf. 

The Democrats in Congress need to get tough. It isn't easy and it isn't fun, but we didn't elect them to brag about being Congressmen or Senators, we elected them to legislate.  Without staying focused they'll continue to fall into the Republican distraction trap.

I was punished in my town for something POSITIVE written ABOUT me by SOMEONE ELSE.  The Democrats in the Senate were being tarred and feathered for an AD put out by someone else.  I should be held accountable for my actions and my votes.  And we should hold the House and Senate accountable for letting George W. Bush get away with war crimes  Are our leaders in Congress letting themselves get distracted because the established Democrats as well as the Republicans in DC want us to forget how they gave George Bush a free pass?

Discuss :: (8 Comments)

Democracy Fluorishes In The Sunshine

by: mikeshapiro

Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 08:44:47 PM EST

( - promoted by njdem)

Cross-Posted from ShapTalk.com:

Governing bodies throughout New Jersey, particularly on the municipal level, are abusing The Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA) and the Open Public Records Act (OPRA). The purpose of these Acts is to enhance democracy by allowing the public to see government in action rather than permitting the government to operate behind closed doors. While some municipalities televise their meetings or otherwise record them, many do neither so there is no true record of what occurs at most public sessions. In addition, while minutes of these meetings are public documents under the law and must be available to its citizens, there is no requirement that the minutes be thorough or that they accurately reflect the meeting they are supposed to memorialize. Too often a citizen who requests documents, including resolutions and ordinances, is routinely given the runaround until he rescinds his request. In addition, there are few vehicles for the public to use when an OPRA request is denied by a governing body. Fortunately, change may be in the air.

There's More... :: (1 Comments, 283 words in story)

Time to Let the Sun Shine In

by: mikeshapiro

Sat Jan 06, 2007 at 06:22:55 PM EST

Cross-posted from ShapTalk.com:

Public confidence in our elected officials continues to crater and apathy has become a fact of life in New Jersey politics. Corruption by many of our representatives is no longer a question of "if" but "when." Negative political campaigns are now the norm, further contributing to the cesspool that is New Jersey politics. While we can be all "doom and gloom" and spend our time complaining, the truth is that we can do something to rectify the situation. There is a remedy to our problems with politics in New Jersey: sunshine. That's right, some good old all-natural sunshine. Here are a few simple ideas that we, as citizens, can facilitate to create more open, transparent and accountable government.

There's More... :: (0 Comments, 460 words in story)
Featured Stories
Standing Up Not Down
by: Jason Springer - Mar 14
5 Comments

Blue Jersey Radio

The Voice of NJ Politics
» Next show: Tues @ 8:00p
» Hosts: Jeff Gardner & Jason Springer
» Call in: (646) 652-2773
» iTunes Subscribe | Archives


Follow us on Twitter @bluejersey

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 TECHNICAL DIRECTOR
 Jason Springer

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 bytheshore73
 Hopeful
 Jeff Gardner
 Scott Weingart
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 Vincent Solomeno
 Jason Springer
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Barista of Bloomfield Ave
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Daily Newarker
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Fresh Jersey (Mike Kelly)
» Garden State Grapevine
» Gloucester City News
» Green Jersey
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» The Inside Clamdigger
» Jersey Blogs
» Lassiter Space
» Latinos NJ
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search













Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.

Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
5745 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.