2 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      

Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?
budget cuts

Malone encouraged: We're still failing people, but spending less for it

by: Jason Springer

Thu Mar 25, 2010 at 02:30:00 PM EDT

We get alot of press releases here at Blue Jersey, but this statement from Assemblyman Joe Malone following the heartwrenching stories and testimony at the Assembly Budget hearings yesterday stuck out like a sore thumb:
"I am encouraged, however, that today's troubling stories are similar to the ones we have heard when the state was spending $34.6 billion, which means that Governor Christie's proposed $29.3 billion budget proposal would minimize impact on the most vulnerable while beginning to reform and restructure New Jersey government so that in the future we will be in a position to provide even more efficient services to the most vulnerable - children, the disabled and senior citizens - without continually burdening our overtaxed residents."
Huh? He's encouraged because people are still struggling and because they are, it means Christies budget doesn't hurt more? What kind of logic is that. He's saying we're still failing people, but he's encouraged because we're spending less to do it?
Discuss :: (0 Comments)

Blame State Workers (PARODY)

by: IndependentNJ

Wed Mar 24, 2010 at 01:42:05 PM EDT

To the tune of "Blame Canada" from "South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut":

Times have changed
New Jersey's getting worse
This bipartisan graft
Is such a fucking curse
Should we blame corruption
Should we blame patronage
Or the taxes driving us to the edge
Fuck No
Blame state workers
Blame state workers
We shall loudly demonize
Get 101.5 to spread lies
Blame state workers
Blame state workers
We'll give them less salt
It's the unions' fault

Don't blame me
I'm just a Christie fan
I wanted hope and change
But I'm as hateful as the Klan
And my boy Corzine's
Denied us our raise
But we rightfully deserve
More than fifteen furlough days
Well, blame state workers
Blame state workers
Seems that all has gone wrong
Since the unions came along
Blame state workers
Blame state workers
They don't even do real work anyway

Well, I'm a New Jersey state legislator rich and fucking true
I'm a triple-dipping pension-padder that unions and students shall rue
Should we blame the contractors
Or should we stoke the fire
So we can now freeze every hire
Blame state workers
Blame state workers
For our property taxes going through
the roof, and patronage too
Blame state workers
Shame on state workers
For...
The pay we must cut
And benefits we will gut
Union achievements
Must all be undone
We must blame and muss and fuss
Before somebody thinks of blaming uuussssssssss!!!!!!

(C) 2010, by Jordan Opalanie

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

Selected From My Blog: Idea #10: 21 Counties, 21 School Districts

by: IndependentNJ

Tue Mar 23, 2010 at 06:54:18 PM EDT

When I heard about Christie's cutting state aid towards public schools in New Jersey, I normally would have cheered! The state budget is bust due to supporting 616 overlapping, inefficient school districts, some of which DON'T EVEN HAVE ANY SCHOOLS!!

This is why I believe that school aid SHOULD be cut, but it should be contingent on the following proposals:

Proposal #1

Merge all 616 school districts into 21 countywide districts. Before I go any further, I would like to stress that NO TEACHER WILL LOSE THEIR JOB, NO SCHOOL WILL CLOSE DOWN, AND YOUR CHILD'S CLASSROOM SIZE WILL NOT INCREASE. Instead, this would bring administration of all schools of a given county into one countywide school district. Although the countywide school district would likely be larger than any single school district in a given county, it will still be smaller than all the school districts within a county put together.

Each countywide school district shall be divided into separate districts, which shall be coterminus with high school sending districts. Each district shall be represented by 1 representative, who shall represent the interests of not only the local high school, but also all junior high and elementary schools which "feed" into the high school. They shall be elected to two year terms in odd number years, the positions shall be non-partisan (and no political party may endorse or in any way meddle). These representatives will compose the "Board of Education", which would be the legislative branch of each school district.

Thus, a hypothetical Ocean County Board of Education would look like this.

District 1 - Pinelands Regional High School Sending District

District 2 - Southern Regional High School Sending District

District 3 - Barnegat High School Sending District

District 4 - Lacey Township High School Sending District

District 5 - Central Regional High School Sending District

District 6 - Toms River South High School Sending District

District 7 - Toms River North High School Sending District

District 8 - Manchester Township High School Sending District

District 9 - New Egypt High School Sending District

District 10 - Jackson Liberty High School Sending District

District 11 - Jackson Memorial High School Sending District

District 12 - Lakewood High School Sending District

District 13 - Brick Memorial High School Sending District

District 14 - Brick Township High School Sending District

District 15 - Point Pleasant High School Sending District

District 16 - Point Pleasant Beach High School Sending District

District 17 - Toms River East High School Sending District

Board of Ed members shall be part time workers who shall receive $400 per meeting for 50 meetings, and are not paid for any meetings after that!!

The executive power shall be vested in a superintendent who will also be elected for a two year term in odd number years. They shall be paid at 125% of the median income of the county in which they represent. There shall also be an assistant superintendent who is elected to a two year term in odd number years, They shall be paid at the median income of the county in which they represent.

No board member or superintendent should receive anybenefits which add to the costs, except for healthcare, in the absence of a universal healthcare system.

Of course, there are many other staff at the district level which I won't get into. But I think th

Proposal #2: Limit the number of non-teacher/non-sipecialized service positions within an individual school:

When making cuts, teachers as well as special ed/special services (ie: psychologists/social workers) should not be skimped on.

In terms of core administrators, each countywide school district in general needs only one superintendent, 1 business superintendent per 10,000 students, 1 assistant superintendent non-business per 10,000 students, and 1 Supervisor of Curriculum Instruction per 10,000 students. Each 7-12 school needs only one assistant principal, and K-6 should have none

Proposal #3

All schools in each district shall receive equal funding per student!!!

And upon implementation of all 3 proposals, eliminate Abbott Districts

If we are able to cut non-teacher positions down to the bare bones, then we need not cut classes or teachers and the district would save money, thus reducing greatly the need for state aid. Administritis is what is killing our schools and the sooner it is addressed, the better.  

Discuss :: (6 Comments)

An animated look at Christie's budget plan

by: Jason Springer

Fri Mar 19, 2010 at 11:30:00 AM EDT

Mike Scott over at New Jersey Newsroom offers this animated take on Governor Christie's budget plans:

You see it's all about priorities.
Discuss :: (4 Comments)

Joe Kyrillos doesn't think he's smart enough

by: Jason Springer

Tue Mar 09, 2010 at 10:30:00 AM EST

Confidant to Governor Christie and NJ State Senator Joe Kyrillos attended a Middletown Board of Education budget forum recently and started talking about how now is the time to allow "really smart people" to make decisions about how to handle the budget crisis that effects the school system due to the Governors budget cuts. He just doesn't think he's one of those really smart people apparently: (h/t Middletown Mike)

Discuss :: (0 Comments)

Follow along with the Assembly Budget Committee Meeting

by: Jason Springer

Wed Feb 17, 2010 at 09:30:00 AM EST

The Assembly Budget Committee will convene this morning in Trenton to take testimony on Governor Christie's proposals for closing the Fiscal Year 2010 estimated budget shortfall. You can see from the tenor of the quotes in the release that it appears the Democrats will continue with their response last week:
"Gov. Christie's ill-advised plan steers New Jerseyans toward property tax increases, potential hospital closures and the possibility of higher tuition and transit fares that are no different than tax hikes," said Greenwald (D-Camden). "It also kills job creation. On top of all that, Gov. Christie kept his plan secret and executed it without any public discussion. This is undemocratic and an affront to residents and businesses alike."
Among the cuts that have received the most scrutiny include the NJ Transit funding, which may lead to higher fairs and service cuts. Cuts in funding to schools, affordable after school programs and Family Care have also raised the attention of advocacy groups and Legislators.

You can hear the audio of the hearing which will be streamed live. The hearing starts at 10am. It would be great if the Assembly could give us video of these hearings and committee meetings more regularly as well so the public could see and not just hear what is going on if they can't make it to Trenton.  

Discuss :: (4 Comments)

Christie all over the map on higher education funding

by: Jason Springer

Tue Dec 15, 2009 at 12:00:00 PM EST

The Governor-Elect is trying to have it all ways talking out of both sides of his mouth on higher education.
Gov.-elect Chris Christie, who campaigned to increase state funding for higher education and called past levels of support "deplorable," will not rule out further aid cuts to public colleges and universities in his first budget.
So he said he'd have more, he slammed the past lack of support, but now may have to inflict more pain. I guess it's not surprising that reality would temper those talking points like many said would be needed if he were to ever govern:
Following a meeting at Rutgers University today with the leaders of several colleges and universities, Christie said he hopes to avoid reductions in state aid, but "in this first year there's going to be a lot of shared sacrifice, so I can't make that commitment." He said his transition team now estimates next year's budget deficit at $9.5 billion -- up from $8 billion projected earlier this year by the nonpartisan Office of Legislative Services -- forcing him to make painful cuts.
But the Star Ledger still makes sure to give him the talking point again after he talks about all the sacrifice that will be coming:
Calling higher education a "top priority," Christie said he still plans to increase funding over the course of his four-year term. He declined to give a dollar figure of what is necessary.
Did you follow all of that? Even the Star Ledger was confused:
At 1:31, they posted the story: Chris Christie says he intends to raise higher education funding in first term

Then at 5:17, we got this story: N.J. Gov.-elect Chris Christie will not rule out cuts to public universities

He campaigned on raising funding, slammed underfunding, said he may have to cut funding, but really really really wants to increase funding in the future because it's a top priority, but won't say by how much or where the money that isn't there now will come from in the future. Got that? Very clear and consistent.
Discuss :: (4 Comments)

Deep Thoughts: Why Not In Jersey?

by: huntsu

Wed Aug 20, 2008 at 09:18:29 AM EDT

There are only two reasons I can think of why New York can do this and New Jersey can't:

1) New York has been amazingly profligate and has tons of waste; or

2) New Jersey doesn't have the political will to do it.

Discuss :: (14 Comments)

They can't even agree on paper calendars

by: Jason Springer

Thu Jul 24, 2008 at 05:04:48 PM EDT

You can't sneeze in New Jersey without upsetting or offending someone.  The State has informed workers that they will not be purchasing paper calendars for 2009:
The move will save an estimated $180,000.

The Division of Purchase and Property has determined that, given the current budget austerity and the universal availability of online calendars and calendar software, it is inappropriate for the state to encourage continued use of paper calendars, a notice sent to state employees said.

The state didn't ban the use of paper calendars, they just said they won't be purchasing them next year for workers.  This move has CWA 1033 President Rae Roeder up in arms:
Rae Roeder, president of Communications Workers of America Local 1033, which represents 6,200 state workers, said paper calendars are important for people to have on their desks to help readily keep track of what they're involved in.

She said the administration could instead save $180,000 by eliminating patronage jobs.

Instead we want to save money by not giving people paper calendars, Roeder said. Oh, whoopee. This is foolishness, absolute foolishness.

I agree with Roeder that the state could save $180 K on patronage jobs and that should be done as well, but the two are not mutually exclusive.  Just because the state is cutting paper calendars doesn't mean they shouldn't also be cutting patronage jobs.  The foolishness is trying to portray this as an either or choice.

At the same time, aren't there more important things to fight about?  If workers don't have a computer where they can use an online calendar, then maybe they should still get them.  I could see arguing that point possibly.  If workers want to have a paper calendar, they still can buy one to use.  The article mentions other cuts that are being made for some context:

The budget cut spending for property tax rebates, colleges, municipalities, hospitals and nursing homes, among other areas.
And we're talking paper calendars?
Discuss :: (6 Comments)

Deep Thoughts

by: huntsu

Thu Apr 03, 2008 at 08:30:17 AM EDT

It seems like every single item proposed to be cut from the state budget is being argued against by either a Democrat or Republican who has previously called for budget cuts, smaller government and lower taxes.   This is why we never actually see any change: no matter what is on the chopping block, some influential person from some party, union or corporation will complain and nothing will happen.
Discuss :: (9 Comments)
<< Previous
Featured Stories

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 Deciminyan
 Hopeful
 Jeff Gardner
 Jersey Jazzman
 KendalJames
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 the_promised_land
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Baristanet
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Channel Surfing
» Deciminyan
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Garden State Grapevine
» ClearysNoteBook
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazzman
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search












Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.



Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
7968 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.
Powered by: SoapBlox