5 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      

Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?
John Dingell

Yesterday's Mammogram Hearings

by: Congressman Frank Pallone

Thu Dec 03, 2009 at 12:43:34 PM EST

This whole issue has left women hearing conflicting things. We had a little technical problem trying to live-stream this yesterday, so it's good to have the congressman's own wrap-up of what happened. Thanks, Rep. Pallone - - promoted by Rosi

Cross Posted on Daily Kos

Many of you have been following the recent controversy about the US Preventive Services Task Force's new breast cancer screening recommendations - in the news, at the watercooler and around the family dinner table. The implied suggestion that screening should start at age 50 rather than the previous recommendation of 40 is a legitimate cause for concern.

I hope that the yesterday's Health Subcommittee hearing will put some of these concerns to rest. Task Force vice-chair Dr. Diana Petitti put it best, explaining that "communication was poor" on the matter, and that their original statement has "been misconstrued." Most importantly, the hearing clarified that decisions on mammograms for patients between 40 and 50 should be made by women and their doctors, and no one else. Under no circumstances should mammograms be denied to women younger than 50.

However, many opponents of health care reform have stoked the fires of controversy on this issue and are continuing to do so. The most dishonest among them are working hard to mislead the public, implying that the task force recommendations were a product of recent efforts to enact health care reform. They were not. In fact, the task force developed its suggestion while George W. Bush was still in the White House.

My colleague and friend John Dingell of Michigan pointed out these tactics for what they are - scare tactics. Even though the Obama administration was extremely proactive when the task force recommendations were released, affirming that government-backed health programs would not stop covering mammograms for women between the ages of 40 to 49, opponents of health reform have claimed otherwise. In fact, health reform will require mammograms. Now, there are no requirements for mammograms for women at any age. So health reform will make more mammograms available and covered by insurance. And even yesterday, as task force members put our fears to rest, anti-reform Republicans made outlandish statements about reform harming women's health, when clearly the opposite is true. They are trying to exploit the fears of women about breast cancer in a dishonest attempt to score political points on health reform.

As the health reform debate comes to a close, it's more important than ever for those of us who believe in real health care reform and a strong public option to be vigilant against the lies and obfuscation of those who would seek to defend the broken status quo. The only way to do that is to ask questions and uncover the truth, just as we did in yesterday's hearings. The health and safety of American women - our mothers, our sisters, our wives and our daughters - is too important an issue to be turned into political fodder by the opponents of reform.

To learn more about what I'm doing to further the health care reform debate in Congress, visit my website at PalloneForAHealthyNJ.com.  

Discuss :: (2 Comments)
[Advertisement]


Rob Andrews backs Dingell

by: Hopeful

Tue Nov 11, 2008 at 02:28:41 AM EST

It's interesting to see that Rob Andrews is working as a whip to help Michigan Congressman John Dingell remain as chair of the powerful Energy and Commerce Committee.  He's being challenged by liberal Henry Waxman because Dingell is generally viewed as working to water down fuel economy standards and broader global warming legislation, though he publicly supports some legislation on global warming.

It's particularly odd to see Andrews with this position since he joined Henry Waxman and the other six New Jersey Democratic Representatives in signing statement of legislative principles for comprehensive global warming legislation. ThinkProgress has implied they think it is because Andrews has received a lot of oil money.

Does anyone know why Andrews is backing Dingell? Please don't tell me he thinks it is  "outrageous and unacceptable" to challenge a more senior member.  

Discuss :: (4 Comments)
Featured Stories

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 Deciminyan
 Hopeful
 Jay Lassiter
 Jeff Gardner
 Jersey Jazzman
 KendalJames
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 the_promised_land
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Baristanet
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Daily Newarker
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Garden State Grapevine
» ClearysNoteBook
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazzman
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search












Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.



Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
7754 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.
Powered by: SoapBlox