4 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      
Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Anti-Gay Groups Jump the Gun

by: Juan Melli

Thu Nov 29, 2007 at 12:05:42 PM EST



Stirring their homophobic sheep into a rabid and very premature frenzy, the National Organization for Marriage is urging their supporters to flood Corzine and the legislature with calls and emails opposing equal marriage rights for all. On the page they set up so out-of-state supporters can contact all 120 New Jersey legislators, the default state in the personal information section is Connecticut. The NJ Family Policy Council also asked supporters to flood legislators with phone calls.

Here's the deal. After November's election, the makeup of the legislature shifted to be considerably less reactionary and more pro-equality than it is now. An email from Garden State Equality chairman Steven Goldstein to some core supporters explained:

In the 2007 elections, we picked up four votes for marriage equality in the Senate, vital in a relatively small body.  By our count, in the incoming Senate, before we even start lobbying, we'll be 19 Senators who are solid "yes" votes or leans "yes" votes, with our needing 21 votes to win.  In the incoming Assembly -- where vote counts in a larger body can vary more -- we can project at least 39 solidly "yes" votes or leans "yes" votes, with our needing 41 votes to win.  We can also project clearing 41 votes in the incoming Assembly, but the worst thing in lobbying is rose-colored glasses.
It would be foolish to try to pass marriage equality legislation during the lame duck period, but these clearly overpaid and out of touch lobbyists somehow got the idea that that was the case. Probably because Senators Ray Lesniak and Loretta Weinberg recently introduced the complement to Assemblyman Reed Gusciora's marriage equality bill. They really believe it because they're even burning money on a 101.5 radio ad (almost identical to an ad run in Wisconsin in 2006) and annoying legislators with calls.
"At this point, they're just wasting their money with the phone calls. Somebody's giving them bad information," Codey said. "It's jamming our phone lines and we can't do our work here."

powered by ODEO
(click above for audio of the ad)

Goldstein explains why they're not responding in kind:
Quite frankly, it would be a snap for us to gin up three times the calls and emails to legislators that the right-wing is doing now.  We've done that time and again over the past couple of years, to the point where legislators have called us begging us to stop.

The difference, of course, is that our calls and emails are really from New Jerseyans, and not from professional right-wing activists from places like Utah.  The right-wing is in free-fall panic because the failure of New Jersey's civil union law to provide equality to same-sex couples -- as marriage would -- is moving new legislators to our side all the time. [...]

Friends, polls can gauge horse-race numbers, where we do well in New Jersey, but they cannot gauge intensity.  The fact is, opponents of marriage equality in New Jersey aren't anywhere near as intense as we supporters in our socially progressive state.  That's why our opponents have to bring in out-of-state ringers to do their calls and emails.

When your opponents are clueless and burning their resources, the best thing to do is stand back and watch:
We've made a conscious decision to rope-a-dope the right wing now.  Let the right-wing exhaust itself silly during this lame duck.  We'll turn the burners back on high after lame duck.
For now, Goldstein says his focus during the lame duck is passing a hate crimes bill:
The bill is as desperately needed, yet as noncontroversial as can be -- we haven't met anyone who opposes it.  The state's hate-crimes law hasn't been updated in years, and an FBI report just came out ranking New Jersey #2, tragically, in the number of hate crimes among all U.S. states.

  This isn't merely an LGBT bill, it's a bill to help all minorities affected by hate crimes.

Goldstein's full email is below.
Juan Melli :: Anti-Gay Groups Jump the Gun
Dear core supporters:

  I've gotten some calls about the article in this morning's Star-Ledger saying that the marriage equality bill isn't being posted this lame duck session of the outgoing legislature.  Not only is this of zero surprise to us at Garden State Equality, we're also thrilled, strategically.  You know our message over and over again:  2008.  2007 hasn't even been in our thinking.  We agree with the decision of Senate President Codey and Speaker Roberts not to post the bill this lame duck.

  The key here is the composition of the incoming legislature.  In the 2007 elections, we picked up four votes for marriage equality in the Senate, vital in a relatively small body.  By our count, in the incoming Senate, before we even start lobbying, we'll be 19 Senators who are solid "yes" votes or leans "yes" votes, with our needing 21 votes to win.  In the incoming Assembly -- where vote counts in a larger body can vary more -- we can project at least 39 solidly "yes" votes or leans "yes" votes, with our needing 41 votes to win.  We can also project clearing 41 votes in the incoming Assembly, but the worst thing in lobbying is rose-colored glasses.

  As advocates, we have to do our job, too -- putting the Senate and Assembly within reach so that when we approach legislative leaders to help us finish the task, the task is reasonable.  That's why we worked so hard in the 2007 election and did so amazingly, bucking the trend of a year where not all progressives and progressive causes did well, to say the least.  We put a ton of resources into the 2007 elections and it paid off.  There will be no excuses not to pass a marriage equality bill in 2008.

  Quite frankly, it would be a snap for us to gin up three times the calls and emails to legislators that the right-wing is doing now.  We've done that time and again over the past couple of years, to the point where legislators have called us begging us to stop.

  The difference, of course, is that our calls and emails are really from New Jerseyans, and not from professional right-wing activists from places like Utah.  The right-wing is in free-fall panic because the failure of New Jersey's civil union law to provide equality to same-sex couples -- as marriage would -- is moving new legislators to our side all the time.  As scores and scores of witnesses have testified over seven hours of testimony before the New Jersey Civil Union Review Commission, the civil union law is a disaster, and to say otherwise is a political fabrication.

  Friends, polls can gauge horse-race numbers, where we do well in New Jersey, but they cannot gauge intensity.  The fact is, opponents of marriage equality in New Jersey aren't anywhere near as intense as we supporters in our socially progressive state.  That's why our opponents have to bring in out-of-state ringers to do their calls and emails.

  We've made a conscious decision to rope-a-dope the right wing now.  Let the right-wing exhaust itself silly during this lame duck.  We'll turn the burners back on high after lame duck.

  Indeed, our focus this lame-duck is on a hate-crimes bill, introduced in the Assembly a couple of weeks ago and in the Senate today, that should be a piece of cake for legislative leaders to post and get passed.  We've worked on the bill with Attorney General Ann Milgram's office.  The bill is as desperately needed, yet as noncontroversial as can be -- we haven't met anyone who opposes it.  The state's hate-crimes law hasn't been updated in years, and an FBI report just came out ranking New Jersey #2, tragically, in the number of hate crimes among all U.S. states.

  This isn't merely an LGBT bill, it's a bill to help all minorities affected by hate crimes.

  The bill's primary sponsors in the Assembly are Fred Caraballo, Valerie Vainieri Huttle, Upendra Chivukula and John McKeon, with Gordon Johnson and Mila Jasey as cosponsors.  The bill's primary sponsors in the Senate are Barbara Buono and Loretta Weinberg, with Ray Lesniak and Joe Vitale as cosponsors.

  We wish you and yours a wonderful holiday season.  Merry Christmas, Happy Kwanzaa and Chag Urim Sameach!

  Yours,
  Steven Goldstein
  Chair, Garden State Equality
  Cell (917) 449-8918

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Foresight (4.00 / 1)
You really have to hand it to Steven. A year ago, he called it brilliantly.

I'd take whatever he says to the bank.


Refresh My Memory (0.00 / 0)
"Called it brilliantly", when?

If there were even a dozen current Senators in favor of marriage equality, then why aren't they co-sponsoring the bill???

A day of reckoning is coming where everyone else will be blamed rather than those who raised unrealistic expectations.

I would think that the death penalty and paid family leave should get a lot more attention, but what do I know?  I'm just a curmudgeon!  :-D


[ Parent ]
Freep the B*****DS! (4.00 / 1)
I went to the website, I edited my message to read:

It is my understanding that two bills are now raised in the New Jersey Legislature which would redefine marriage: Senate bill S2898 and the Assembly companion bill A3685. I COULD NOT BE MORE VIGOROUS IN MY SUPPORT FOR BOTH OF THESE BILLS! EXTEND MARRIAGE EQUALITY TO ALL!

I always love doing that ...


And Some Legislators Read Their E-mail (0.00 / 0)
or at least, have staffers to attached canned replies.

Unfortunately, it was Michael Patrick Carroll who wrote back. But it proves that at least some of the messages get through. So use the NOM's dime (click the link in the original post) and freep on!

FYI, MPC's predictable response is here, mostly for the record:

  RE: Support a Pro-Same Sex Marriage Amendment
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:58:15 -0500
From: "Carroll, Asm. D.O."  
To: "Dennis McGrath"

Thank you very much for favoring me with your recent note respecting marriage. I greatly appreciate your taking the time to
  write.

Marriage has long been defined as the union of one man  and one woman, not, primarily, for the benefit of the couple, but for
  the benefit of the children that marriage laws assume will result.
  Society benefits from the creation and maintenance of those
  relationships most conducive
to the welfare of children. I see no need to expand the definition to
include relationships which, self-evidently, serve no societal purpose.

Even were I inclined toward such indulgence, though, I would oppose such expansion of benefits as little more than a raid upon
  the Treasury. Marriage carries with it many benefits and subsidies, at taxpayer expense, because society expects children to benefit as a result. Whenever someone approaches government with their palm out, demanding
money, it behooves a fiscally responsible representative to inquire as to the rationale for the requested subsidy. I have yet
  to receive a good answer - indeed, any answer - as to why government should extend
subsidies to close friendships which provide society with no reciprocal benefits.

For these reasons, I will oppose any effort to broaden the definition of marriage beyond one man and one woman.

mpc


[ Parent ]
More Productive Strategy (0.00 / 0)
Send it to people like Baroni and Beck or Kean, Bateman, Allen, Connors (Jr.) and Ciesla and see what their response is.  I might have exhausted the list of "reasonable" GOP Senators.  :-)

You could even try it out on Sweeney, Madden, Rice, Sarlo, Gordon, Redd, Sacco, Cunningham (you get the idea).

But use a different name or a friend, since you are somewhat known.


[ Parent ]
My support (4.00 / 1)
for hate crime legislation is that it at least forces jurisdictions to face the facts about what is happening under their noses.

To hell with what she wants, let's make Rosi Efthim the next DSC chair.

Suggestion for Legislative Staff (4.00 / 2)
Make a mail filter that sends to the trash folder any message with the title "Support a Marriage Amendment" and without the string ", NJ" in the body.

Take the Loveable Guy Creed Pogue Challenge (4.00 / 4)
A few times over the past year, my friend Creed Pogue - who is a really nice guy in person - has asked, What's Garden State Equality's strategy to win marriage equality?

The constraint in our responding?  The right wing reads this website everyday (as we read all of their websites, everyday).  So it would be irresponsible for me to post a substantive response here.  Many times I've been tempted to do so, feeling baited.  Not worth it.

So I'll tell ya what:  I'll take Creed and two other doubters, ad seriatum, to lunch on my dime, not GSE's.  And I'll donate $100 to each of their favorite nonpolitical charities, too.  Again, my dime. 

This would give us the opportunity to explain what our strategy was in 2007 and how we achieved it.  We'll tell you about 2008, too, with some constraints, of course, because it's crazy to reveal future strategy in any forum.

We know where we're we've been, how we got there, where we're going and how we'll get there.  We have decision trees in our strategic thinking contingent on all sorts of possibilities. 

We're armed and ready to win marriage equality in 2008.  Creed, you game?  Anyone else? 


You invited me out before and I did accept, but we never made it happen. However, I am always happy to break bread. (0.00 / 0)
My email is csp066@aol.com

Just so everyone knows, Steven's very generous donation will go to help two kids in DYFS placements have a wonderful holiday season.

Seriously, thank you very much.  There are a lot more kids needing placements and the temporary homes don't sign up for "holiday" presents.

Not that he asked, but I promise to treat what I am told as "top secret."


[ Parent ]
Great, Creed, we'll break bread, I'll e-mail you off-line (0.00 / 0)
And I didn't ask about anything needing to be "top secret" because it would still be a careful Steven breaking bread, I confess.  Thrilled to make a donation to a good cause like this.  Happy holidays!

[ Parent ]
okay, Steven, I'm in (4.00 / 1)
Although as you are well aware I fully support marriage equality, I have doubts about our ability to get it in 2008 (or 2009 either).

My favorite non-political charity is Amnesty International.

And while my personal email address is DGutenkauf@aol.com, that mailbox fills up so quickly it drives me nuts--that's why I sent you another (my secure undisclosed location).  But I didn't get your "core supporters" email (sob)!

"Do what you can, with what you have, where you are."  (Teddy Roosevelt)


[ Parent ]
More the Merrier! (0.00 / 0)
If Dottie is fine with it, I'm fine with Dottie joining us for lunch.  I was wondering if there was a good kosher deli located midway between Plainfield and Estell Manor, but since there are two of you from Union, then maybe it should be closer to you.  Extra long trip again!  ;-)

I also agree with Dottie about the merits and the timing. 

By the way, it should not merit being called a homophobe to question the timing or the strategy.  Talk about civility on this blog doesn't mean much when silence is the response to a coarsening of the dialogue.

(drumroll)  Who is behind Door #3???


[ Parent ]
Interesting BTW/Aside.... (0.00 / 0)
I was tempted to comment along the lines you imply; but you forstalled that by preemptively framing any response as a communication from the "courtesy police". 

As it turned out, the silence/vacuum was filled wonderfully by a higher intelligence than my own!  :-)

For what it's worth Creed, never having met you or engaged you in any in direct conversation or interaction, I have zero reason to believe you're a "homophobe" and am more than content to take Steven's word that you are actually a nice guy in real life.

I hope that he is successful in his efforts to convince you that marriage equality makes sense as a practical political agenda/aim in 08; but even if he's not...that alone wouldn't mean you would have to be a "homophobe" to have a different view about the strategy/timing of implementing progressive agenda items.

It's a cliche; but it's an objective truth and bears repeating:  We are not a monolithic movement (thank God ;-); however, we (and, again, I explicitly include myself in this call) need to find ways to constructively disagree with each other without being disagreeable. 

Meanwhile, enjoy lunch!  :-)

 


[ Parent ]
ADVERTISEMENT
Featured Stories
Time for my next step
by: Jason Springer - Jul 27
14 Comments

Blue Jersey Radio

The Voice of NJ Politics
» Next show: Tues. @ 8:00p
» Hosts: Jeff Gardner & Jason Springer
» Call in: (646) 652-2773
» iTunes Subscribe | Archives



Connect with
Blue Jersey

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 TECHNICAL DIRECTOR
 Jason Springer

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 bytheshore73
 Hopeful
 Jeff Gardner
 Scott Weingart
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 Vincent Solomeno
 Jason Springer
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Barista of Bloomfield Ave
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Daily Newarker
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Fresh Jersey (Mike Kelly)
» Garden State Grapevine
» Gloucester City News
» Green Jersey
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» The Inside Clamdigger
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazz Man
» Lassiter Space
» Latinos NJ
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search











Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.






Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
6304 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.