7 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      
Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Chris Christie Still Has a Job

by: huntsu

Thu Mar 01, 2007 at 05:02:46 PM EST



UPDATE: Ooooh!  Congressional subpoenas of the Bush admin on firing US Attorneys.  What fun!

Over the past few months a major scandal has been brewing between the Bush administration and US Attorneys around the country.  Apparently the Bush folks have been pressuring a number of the most qualified folks out of their jobs as US Attorneys, replacing eight of them with party hacks and friends of Bush.  Early indications were that this was a patronage purge to reward friends, but it soon started to expand.

It turned out they could pull this stunt off because of a little-known - actually, almost unknown - provision slipped into the new USA PATRIOT Act by Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) at the behest of the Bush administration that made it possible for the White House to install anyone they wanted in the post.  Previously, if the US Senate didn't confirm the replacement in 120 days the court would appoint a replacement.  The new provision removed the court and allows the Bush folks to stick anyone they want in the spot indefinitely. 

All the Bush folks have to do is appoint someone as interim US Attorney and not submit them to the US Senate and suddenly there are no checks or balances on who can get one of those jobs.

Some of the US Attorneys who were, essentially, fired were the ones who prosecuted such Republicans as Brent Wilkes, former CIA Executive Director Dusty Foggo and former Congressman Duke Cunningham.  The strong suspicion is that these prosecutors were canned for partisan political protection and not for cause.

Then this week the US Attorney who was forced out in New Mexico, David Iglesias, maintains that he was let go because he refused to issue indictments for two Democratic politicians prior to November's elections.  He suggested that the pressure came from Rep. Heather Wilson (R-NM) and Senator Peter Domenici (R-NM) refuses to say that he did not do the same.

So what does this have to do with New Jersey?  We've got a US Attorney, Chris Christie, and he has not been fired.

huntsu :: Chris Christie Still Has a Job

A warning at this point.  All the conclusions that follow from here are supposition and there is no evidence that these conclusions are true.  It is just that there are a number of points that coincide between what the New Mexico's Iglesias refused to do and what Chris Christie did do.

Chris Christie is a former Republican Freeholder from Morris County who had the honor to be a Bush "Pioneer" in the 2000 election.  Pioneers are people who raised $100,000 or more for Bush Cheney 2000.  After Bush took office in 2000, Christie was appointed US Attorney for New Jersey.  Christie was also widely rumored to be a leading Republican candidate for Frank Lautenberg's Senate seat, and is the leading Republican to take on Jon Corzine for Governor in 2009.  In short, he has been a powerful and long-time partisan Republican, and has aspirations to enter politics again as a Republican some day in the future.

He has also prosecuted Republican and Democratic politicians in his time as a US Attorney. He had a high-profile prosecution of almost a dozen Republicans and a couple Democrats in local Monmouth County politics, and nailed Jim Treffinger (the leading 2002 Republican candidate for US Senate before he was indicted).  This has, largely, insulated Christie from complaints of playing politics with his office.

But Christie is not the only US Attorney to go after Republicans as well as Democrats.  Carol Lam of California brought down Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham in 2005, an early blow to the hopes of the Republican party to shed the corruption label.  She was forced to resign as US Attorney last fall. 

According to the reports on Iglesias he was forced out after getting pressure to start playing politics with his allegedly non-partisan office.  There have been other suggestions that these replacements are political retribution, as well, such as the replacement of Little Rock US Attorney Bud Cummins by former Karl Rove aide Tim Griffin, and of course the Lam debacle.

The US Attorney who was forced out in Seattle, also is rumored to have lost his job for failing to help Republicans win an election in 2004:

One of the most persistent rumors in Seattle legal circles is that the Justice Department forced McKay, a Republican, to resign to appease Washington state Republicans angry over the 2004 governor's race. Some believe McKay's dismissal was retribution for his failure to convene a federal grand jury to investigate allegations of voter fraud in the race.
It appears that US Attorneys who prosecute or get in the way of Republicans are getting fired.  Christie still has a job.

Christie's prosecutions of Republicans were all before the passage of the amended USA Patriot Act that gave the Bush administration new powers to replace at will.  In fact, they were fairly early in his tenure.

This brings up the question: how many US Attorneys were leaned on to use their office for political gain?  And how many of those gave in to the pressure in order to keep their jobs?

Again, this is all conjecture, and the fact that Christie was not forced out in no way suggests that he got or acceded to political pressure. 

But over the past seven months his office has been leaking more information against Democrats than in the past.

In September, Christie issued a subpoena on a non-profit regarding their rental of a building from Democratic Senator Bob Menendez as he was in a rough campaign with Tom Kean Jr.  The subpoena came in what appeared concert with the Kean Jr. campaign's post-Labor Day putsch on corruption issues, and knocked Menendez off message for weeks.

The subpoena was not issues quietly, either. 

"The big issue of the subpoena is that, while ordinarily they are kept confidential, it was quickly known by everybody that this was issued," said Rick Thigpen, a Democratic strategist. "You would certainly wonder was there anything so significantly pressing that it couldn't wait till after the election."

In fact, there was a lot of press regarding the subpoena - including comments from Christie - before the election and then a seeming silence since then.  This could be simply a loss of interest after an election, but there has also been no move on Menendez.  There was a very public subpoena and then it quieted down.

Recently Christie has been ratcheting up the pressure.  He issued subpoenas on the NJ Legislature, including the Office of Legislative Services, leaders of both houses (controlled by Democrats), and the Majority and Minority offices for each house.  This is in an effort to identify if there were corrupt deals made to issue "Christmas Tree" grants in recent budgets.  The targets will, most likely, be Democrats as they have controlled the legislature for the past few years.

This week we hear that Christie has sent subpoenas to Governor Jon Corzine's office covering Jim McGreevey (D), Dick Codey (D) and Corzine.  Not Whitman or when the Republicans controlled the entire government and produced their own Christmas Tree items.

The subpoenas for the legislature came right while the Democrats were making noises about passing major tax reform and corruption reform legislation, blunting the political gain to be made and bolstering the Republican press release machine.

The subpoena for the Governor's office came just after he released a budget proposal that included no new taxes for the first time in years, and increased aid to schools along with a new tax relief program.  But the positive political benefit from that was again blunted by the subpoenas and the related taint of corruption.

There is surely no fire here, and maybe only a scent of smoke from far away.  But the actions and subpoenas of the past seven months are exactly what a US Attorney who was told to put pressure on the Democrats would start doing.  Every time a Democrat starts gaining points, hit them with a subpoena.  Every time a Republican needs to score points, make an announcement.

Chris Christie may be the most honest US Attorney in history, but he is also a powerful Republican partisan who is beholden to a powerfully partisan Bush White House for his job while others in the same position are losing theirs.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Unqualified US Attorneys (0.00 / 0)
Holy goodness, DUBYA strikes again.  Do the names Mike Brown and Christie Whitman ring any bells.  "Heck of a job Brownie" and "The air in Manhattan is safe to breathe"
(or somethings to that effect)are statements that still send chills up my spine.

Maybe that police dog that got a diploma from an online school is being considered as a candidate.  He'll be good at sniffing out crime.


It's a very interesting theory (0.00 / 0)


I have to think of a witty signature about Frank LoBiondo

Another day, another Bush scandal (0.00 / 0)
Huntsu's original post poses some incredibly interesting questions about the role of subpoenas being issued by U.S. attorneys for purely political gain. First, is anyone truly surprised that Pres. Bush and his corrupt administration would fire U.S. attorneys based upon political concerns and then hire from their own ilk?

Secondly, we have no hard evidence that Christie has done anything wrong, but the circumstantial evidence that Huntsu cites does create a string of concerning moments (Menendez gets subpoenad two months before the election, news of the subpoena is leaked) that could be construed as partisan.

At the very least, we should get Madrid's New Mexico congressional seat in '08 from this scandal, especially if she is implicated; she won by the skin of her teeth in November, and this could sink her.


huntsu (4.00 / 1)
It seems to me that Christie has definitely been doing the bidding of the RNC, espsecially after the Patriot Act, when the federal investigations against Democrats made for huge headlines, including last week, when the Star-Ledger had it over the fold on the front page.

But how clean is Christie, anyway? A couple of years ago, the New York Times ran an editorial piece when U.S. Atty. Christopher Christie's brother, Todd Christie, who was subject to an investigation by the Security and Exchange Commission for some kind of shady dealings, suddenly was no longer under investigation. It appears that the Republican fundraiser was able to bring some influence to bear via his brother, who happens to be a U.S. Federal Atty. The New York Times seemed to think so, and I don't think that's too far-fetched myself. With the S.E.C. under the authority of a Bush appointee, it hardly surprises me that a brother of a Bush appointee, who is also a Pioneer, would not have to endure a federal investigation.

What is clear to me is that Christie had more obviously been a partisan tool of the Republicans, and that is why he still has a job. That is how his job is being used, and he's been going along with it for the sake of the Republican Party. If he is directed to investigate any Democrat, he most likely will. If he is directed to investigate a Republican, he will do so only if that Republican is considered expendible. Obviously, he would not have been in authority to investigate his own brother for insider trading, but to the S.E.C., Todd Christie was not an expendible NJ Republican. The NYT editorial questioned the whole friends in high places aspect of how the investigation was made to *poof!* disappear.

Perhaps Chris Christie is a magician! Voila!


On The Other Hand... (0.00 / 0)
Christie's brother was convicted of civil crimes, but not criminal ones.

[ Parent ]
Well done...I've long believed that Mr. Christie is J. Edgar Hoover-eqsue (0.00 / 0)
I remember when GWB appointed Chris Christie a few years back.  He was a Morris County Freeholder with a lackluster record who made a name for himself raising money for the President. 

The corruption investigations that C.C. gets all the credit for began with his predecessor and are generally conducted by career U.S. Attorneys, not political appointees.

But to quote a dearly departed friend, "never piss off the U.S. Attorney."  I've always believed that no one in either party wants to question C.C.'s murky ethical fog because they fear he will hold a press conference announcing an "investigation" into the accuser before clamming up and keeping everyone guessing (except for the Gannett hack Bob Ingle, who will automatically judge said person guilty as heck).

So if you see the FBI raiding my office and seizing my laptop, now you'll know why ;-)


In A Sane World A Party Hack Could Not Be Appointed or... (0.00 / 0)
...confirmed for such a position.  It's just stinks.

No wonder there are so few really widespread investigations of corruption in NJ. 

The same interests that buy off the Republicans buy off the Democrats and obviously; what we can see of it is by definition legalized pay to play/influence peddling.

I bet a truly independent/aggressive US Attorney with the right level of funding would be able to use the RICO statutes to do a really clean bipartisan sweep of the miscreants in NJ governance.

As I've said elsewhere, there must be at least 500 crooked pols for every one that ever gets convicted of anything.


I think you guys are missing the cliche... (0.00 / 0)
Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. The reason Christie seems to nail mainly democrats is because currently, they are in power in the state. The republicans don't have many opportunities to be corrupt because they are not controlling things.
Having said that, I know we have no control case to test what Mr. Christie's actions would have been if Republicans were in power.
But I'd like to give him the benefit of the doubt here, he seems to be doing a lot of good for the state.
Other than Menendez, I don't think anyone could argue that he has targeted anyone who didn't deserve it. The question remains is he deliberately avoiding investigation of Republicans, and I'm saying those opportunites are limited because they don't control much of anything.

"Where ever you go, there you are." - Buckaroo Bonzai

Yes, The Ratio of Investigations/Enforcement... (0.00 / 0)
should "favor" Democrats, as you suggest.

Me real beef is that the numbers of investigations and prosecutions is wayyyyyyyy too low.

The state AG isn't doing much, and the US Attorney isn't picking up any slack.

There's so much dirt that those of us who follow NJ politics can ALL smell; it's inconceivable to me that the only corruption that exists is the legalized kind that is built into the campaign finance system.

If enough investigative light/heat was focused on all levels of NJ governance across the board, I bet it would yield HUNDREDS/THOUSANDS of cases.

We need a zero tolerance policy on official misconduct!  If  it cost a billion bucks to root it all out it would be well worth it on all levels.  Is there anyone here who really believes that the status quo is acceptable???


[ Parent ]
But ... (0.00 / 0)
If this were a different White House and there weren't more than a half dozen US Attorneys fired recently and replaced thanks to a piece of law snuck into an unrelated bill at the last moment and Christie weren't a partisan former elected official who raised more than $100,000 for President Bush, you might be right.

I would expect more investigations of Democrats than Republicans in NJ, and am not talking about that.

I am talking about dropping subpoenas right as good news comes out, or seemingly in concert with a Republican campaign.  That's a different story.


[ Parent ]
Agreed. (0.00 / 0)
You made good points. And with the history of what's been going on, it's not too much of a stretch.
But I still hope its a genuine passion for law enforcement rather than politics.

"Where ever you go, there you are." - Buckaroo Bonzai

[ Parent ]
Writing and Enforcing Good Law IS... (0.00 / 0)
...the highest manifestation of politics.

Unfortunately "politics" has become a dirty word, the same way "fuck" has become a dirty word.

Ideally, politics can be a manifestation of love; not of screwing people over.


[ Parent ]
ADVERTISEMENT
Featured Stories
Welcome, New Blue Jerseyans
by: Rosi Efthim - Aug 31
2 Comments

Blue Jersey Radio

The Voice of NJ Politics
» Next show: Tues. @ 8:00p
» Hosts: Jeff Gardner & Jay Lassiter
» Call in: (646) 652-2773
» iTunes Subscribe | Archives



Connect with
Blue Jersey

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 bytheshore73
 Hopeful
 Jay Lassiter
 Jeff Gardner
 Scott Weingart
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 Vincent Solomeno
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Barista of Bloomfield Ave
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Daily Newarker
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Fresh Jersey (Mike Kelly)
» Garden State Grapevine
» Gloucester City News
» Green Jersey
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» The Inside Clamdigger
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazz Man
» Lassiter Space
» Latinos NJ
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search










Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.






Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
6407 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.