9 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      
Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Why New Jersey Needs Clean Elections

by: Matthew Jordan

Tue Jun 02, 2009 at 08:17:39 AM EDT



Promoted from the diaries - - Rosi

When you look at the configuration of New Jersey Congressional and Legislative districts the most apparent characteristic is fairly straightforward: the district either heavily favors a Democrat or Republican, and the latter usually has little chance of winning.  Most elections are uneventful, unwinnable, and inherently bad for a representative democracy.  

As a Democrat I look at the legislative map and think, this is great, there is probably not one feasible electoral scenario that will give Assembly Republicans the opportunity to control a majority.  They have to run the electoral board, holding every potentially vulnerable seat and performing well in LD1, LD14, LD36, and one of LD4 & LD38 in order to take back a majority.  All on limited resources with a broken party infrastructure.  

Out of 40 Legislative Districts in New Jersey any politically savvy person will tell you that there is probably only 2 battleground elections.  In LD1 Assemblymen Nelson Albano and Matthew Milam will fight to be reelected with Senator Jeff Van Drew not at the top of the ticket.  In LD36 Gary Schaer and Frederick Scalera are facing 2 candidates who came very close to unseating them in 2007 due to a series of local issues, mainly the Encap fiasco.  I would put Assemblyman Wayne DeAngelo higher on the list of potentially vulnerable Democrats, but the Republican recruiting effort there was just embarrassing, especially in what could be a very competitive. election in LD14 where alienated State workers are a large portion of the electorate.  

Matthew Jordan :: Why New Jersey Needs Clean Elections
The biggest problem in 'uncompetitive' districts is simple: it is nearly impossible for a Democratic or Republican challenger to raise a credible amount of money to mount a serious campaign.  Campaigns are expensive, and if a candidate is not independently wealthy or has a network of wealthy friends, it is impossible for any candidates to raise the money for people to take you seriously.    

If New Jersey expanded its clean elections program to all 40 Districts, our democracy would become healthier, our elected officials would become more responsive, and interest groups & lobbyists would not be the only constituency our Senators and Assembly Members were trying to keep happy.  Legislators would be freed from the grip of special interest money and truly be able to legislate in the best interest of their constituents interest.  

Elected officials in New Jersey are often too entrenched for their own good.There is no accountability because the process is essentially controlled by a small group of politically connected people that creates and promotes all of the symptoms for an ineffective and potentially corrupt State government.  The elections are a rubber stamp on what a small group of people decide in a backroom.    

We need to expand our clean elections program and force our legislators to collect small dollar donations from their constituents.  Challengers need to have the access to the resources necessary to run a credible campaign without having a small fortune to their names.  This will attract more qualified candidates, more diverse candidates, and in the long run, a more wellrounded group of legislators in Trenton.  

Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tip Jar...... (4.00 / 3)
any races out there you think should be considered a battleground?

I know I am drinking the kool-aid in LD40.  


Question... (0.00 / 0)
It is, at least in theory, possible for assemblymen of different parties to be elected from the same legislative district, correct?

If so, then I submit LD21.  If Nancy Munoz wins the Republican primary today and joins Jon Bramnick on the ticket, then I suspect there could be some voter backlash over her appointment to her late husband's seat.  I've talked to a few Republican primary voters who are disgusted with the party bosses for appointing her and voted for either Vitureira or Meringolo (along with Bramnick) instead.


What Democrats are running? (0.00 / 0)
I'd like to hear their story, their issues, and why they could unseat them.  Can you shed some light?  

[ Parent ]
LD21 (0.00 / 0)
The Democratic ticket is the same as it was in 2007, actually...Norman Albert, former mayor of Cranford, and Bruce Bergen, longtime township attorney of Springfield, are the nominees (they ran unopposed in today's primary).  

Although this is a solidly Republican district, I feel like there could be backlash over the selection of Nancy Munoz for this seat, as mentioned above.  On the off chance that Munoz loses the primary and Bramnick's running mate is Vitureira or Meringolo, things could get interesting.  Vitureira, the mayor of Long Hill, is a mainstream Republican who would be suited to run with Bramnick, but Meringolo is a hardcore wingnut Lonegan Republican with little political experience (not to say that Munoz has any, of course).  

I feel as though Albert would be the more likely Dem to take a seat, if indeed the district's representation can be split.  He is fiscally conservative (but socially liberal), and an ethics reformer who supports banning dual office holding and opposes raiding the pension fund, as Corzine has done.  In fact, Albert is just the kind of Democrat that a Christie Republican could get behind.  

The more liberal/progressive candidate of the two is Bergen.  Now, while I do not doubt that Bergen is a good lawyer (he has to be to keep getting re-appointed to his position), his liberalism and support for Corzine run counter to the sentiments in this Republican district.  

I'd still like to know the answer to my first question, though...anyone know?


[ Parent ]
Yes, it is absolutely possible (0.00 / 0)
for one LD to have a mix of R and D representatives. Legally, at least. But it is very rare. The 14th has had mixed representation since the 1999 elections. That's the only one that I know of off-hand, though.  

[ Parent ]
I agree wholeheartedly, but... (0.00 / 0)
The reality, unfortunately, is that too many people benefit too much from the way the system works currently. My feeling about the current Clean Elections program is that it was sabotaged from the beginning by Codey, Roberts, et al. By limiting it so strictly, it never had a chance of working properly. To be truly effective, participation must be mandatory. However, SCOTUS has ruled that campaign donations are speech and any limitations must be narrow and targeted to a specific, compelling government interest. (Donation caps are permissible due to the interest in preventing corruption.)

I hate to be a downer, but the reality is that, unless there is a significant public groundswell in favor of truly clean elections, the legislature will never go for this proposal because more competition would mean that their jobs are at risk. And ultimately, the foremost concern of any politician is getting re-elected. Public policy and doing things for their constituencies comes in a distant second.  


I realize this is very cynical (0.00 / 0)
But I used to work for a member of the Legislature and I know how they think. I was shocked the first time I encountered the "guard-down" discussion in the caucus room. THere are very, very few "good guys" out there.  

[ Parent ]
ADVERTISEMENT
Featured Stories
Time for my next step
by: Jason Springer - Jul 27
14 Comments

Blue Jersey Radio

The Voice of NJ Politics
» Next show: Tues. @ 8:00p
» Hosts: Jeff Gardner & Jason Springer
» Call in: (646) 652-2773
» iTunes Subscribe | Archives



Connect with
Blue Jersey

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 TECHNICAL DIRECTOR
 Jason Springer

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 bytheshore73
 Hopeful
 Jeff Gardner
 Scott Weingart
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 Vincent Solomeno
 Jason Springer
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Barista of Bloomfield Ave
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Daily Newarker
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Fresh Jersey (Mike Kelly)
» Garden State Grapevine
» Gloucester City News
» Green Jersey
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» The Inside Clamdigger
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazz Man
» Lassiter Space
» Latinos NJ
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search











Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.






Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
6304 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.