3 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      

Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Rob Andrews: "When you have a problem within a family, you better address it."

by: Juan Melli

Fri Jun 06, 2008 at 03:02:01 PM EDT



Congressman Rob Andrews made news today with some comments he made about the Clinton campaign. "There have been signals coming out of the Clinton campaign that have racial overtones that indeed disturb me," he told the Star Ledger.

Several people I've talked to have asked why he's speaking up now while the Democratic party is trying to unify after a bitter primary. So I asked him.

Andrews answered with a rhetorical question. When a family has a problem, "is it better to hide it or talk about it?" I told him many might prefer that the issue die quietly, but he said that's how dysfunctional families deal with their problems.

Andrews said that the Democratic party needs to address this real issue or face defeat to John McCain. "If we go into November and these tensions still exist, we're going to lose," he said. "We have to deal with it. We have to get it behind us so we can win in November."

He noted that Congressman James Clyburn's outrage at Bill Clinton for minimizing Obama's South Carolina victory by comparing him to Jesse Jackson was a healthy thing for the party.

Andrews was careful to point out that these comments didn't come from Hillary Clinton herself, but from campaign staff. "That's not the Hillary Clinton I know." He added that her recent remarks at AIPAC were a healthy step forward towards addressing the divide.

Asked about the political repercussions he might suffer for airing the dirty laundry, he said that "losing the election in November is bigger than any one person's career."

Juan Melli :: Rob Andrews: "When you have a problem within a family, you better address it."
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I had wondered about this (4.00 / 2)
a ray of sunshine is revealing a bit of infection.  It's time to get the antiseptic, no matter how much it stings.

(nursing memories of Bactine)


I call Shenanigans! (2.00 / 1)
Hmmmm, Rob heard this months ago but didn't say anything while Clinton was still in the race.

Rob heard this months ago but didn't say anything while it would still impact his own race.

I sort of doubt that this is all about healing divides.


Going for party elder? (0.00 / 0)
Kind of ironic for a guy who just ran on being full of youth and vigor.

Then again, maybe now that he's leaving office, he figures he might as well speak his mind.

Or he's looking for a post in an Obama administration.


[ Parent ]
it's coming clean, but should have been earlier (0.00 / 0)
Like I have said before, it may well have totally changed the race for Rob too.  It would have opened up a whole group of people who weren't looking at him before.  The publicity would have been priceless.  This would have been the type of "Hail Mary pass" that would have actually won.

[ Parent ]
Would require a name (4.00 / 2)
It would require a name to really come clean.  Andrews kept this to himself for six weeks when it could have made a difference in the primary, allowing the Clinton campaign to keep doing what he now says was wrong.

Rob was in a bad place, and I can understand keeping it to yourself.  But by talking about it now he has created an obligation for himself: he has to tell the name and get that person out of Democratic campaigns.

Otherwise all he has accomplished is exacerbating the problems in the family he says he is trying to heal, because without a name there is no solution to the problem he raised.


[ Parent ]
I'm sorry (3.67 / 6)
but, if I had been a Clinton endorsee, and I had (quoting from the earlier diary on this):
received a phone call shortly before the April 22 Pennsylvania primary from a top member of Clinton's organization and ... the caller explicitly discussed a strategy of winning over Jewish voters by exploiting tensions between Jews and African-Americans,
I would have immediately contacted someone still higher in the Clinton organization, and demanded that the caller be removed immediately. And, if the response was insufficient, I would have gone public immediately and withdrawn my endorsement.

And, if by some absurd logic, I waited until now to come clean about it, then I would realize that I needed to name the person who I'm accusing of this.

This isn't addressing a problem within a family. This is rumormongering.


Re: I'm sorry (4.00 / 2)
If that had been the case and he had done all those things, wouldn't the reaction have been that it was a desperate ploy to win votes?

Anyone think Pallone wouldn't have called him a Republican again if he had done that?

From the time this happened, I don't think he had any good opportunity to say this without having his motives or credibility questioned.


[ Parent ]
Motives (4.00 / 4)
From the time this happened, I don't think he had any good opportunity to say this without having his motives or credibility questioned

Evidently, he still doesn't.  


[ Parent ]
Too bad (2.00 / 1)
Andrews' claims have no credibility, barring a revelation of the Clinton caller, given his own despicable attacks during his own primary.

If he was so concerned with party unity, his campaign against Senator Lautenberg would have been about issues, not personal attacks.

He's looking for a job with Obama; let's hope the good Senator from Illinois runs away from this shameless opportunist.


[ Parent ]
thank you (0.00 / 0)
for illustrating my point. Even if he had said this during the campaign, his motives and credibility would have been questioned, as you have just done.

[ Parent ]
So, Rob would have lost by 40 points? (4.00 / 2)
It really couldn't have gotten any worse could it?  Making the run, allowing Camille to be a placeholder and running the age ad pretty well guarantees that Rob is at the back of the line for any future statewide bid.  Exposing filthy tactics from the Clinton campaign would have dramatically changed that dynamic.

[ Parent ]
Instead of rating this a "1" :-) (4.00 / 1)
I'll say that you are ABSOLUTELY wrong.

I doubt if Pallone would have gotten involved.  Pallone knows what people are capable of.

I think that whomever would have been outed would have then squealed up the ladder.  So, it would have all come out and Andrews would have had positive publicity that he couldn't have paid for.


[ Parent ]
I am just wondering if (4.00 / 1)
Clinton pledged delegate Joe Ferriero gave them the idea of exploiting religion and race this year or if Joe GOT the idea from them to use in Teaneck.  Either way, I am disgusted with all of them.

One Vote.  Yours.  It really does matter.

[ Parent ]
Jay: since you gave Jeff a "2", (4.00 / 1)
what would you suggest?  Should the matter be left with "unnamed Clinton staffer suggests inciting racial hatred to stop Obama" and just file the story away under "politics ain't beanbag?"  Or, shouldn't the person be outed and the issue discussed?

Let us remember that Hillary was happy enough to make hay out of a distorted conversation between Obama's economic adviser and the Canadian embassy.  This would seem to be much worse, especially since it seems to fit into the apparent real strategy of the campaign.


[ Parent ]
Somewhat related (0.00 / 0)
Is McCain really going to be able to exploit this divide when he thinks the best way to attract Clinton supporters is through Joe Lieberman, who has, since winning in 2006, done his best at antagonizing Hillary as well?

If he were serious, he would have swung a major Hillary backer (and Jersey City boy) like Lanny Davis or someone else. Though Lanny, despite his occasional faults, is too good of a guy to abandon the party.


Featured Stories

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 Deciminyan
 Hopeful
 Jay Lassiter
 Jeff Gardner
 Jersey Jazzman
 KendalJames
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 the_promised_land
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Baristanet
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Daily Newarker
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Garden State Grapevine
» ClearysNoteBook
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazzman
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search












Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.



Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
7752 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.
Powered by: SoapBlox