1 user logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      

Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Shulman Snubs Media

by: jonas

Tue May 13, 2008 at 10:09:23 PM EDT



In an effort to avoid debate with primary opponent Camille Abate, Dennis Shulman's campaign has refused to respond to repeated requests to appear on the television program New Jersey Now.  This move calls into question Shulman's viability in a general election matchup against Republican incumbent Scott Garret.

Refusal to communicate with members of the media will leave the Shulman campaign without precious relationships with the very media outlets covering the race through November.  If reporters seeking to cover the race fail to receive the courtesy of a reply, interest will fade and future coverage will not materialize in a general election competition.

Abate, who immediately accepted the request to appear on the program, is now better positioned to argue that Scott Garrett should participate in general election debate.  In refusing televised primary debate Shulman has lost the ability to argue for debate in a general election contest.

Any path to victory against incumbent Republican Scott Garret must include the ability to call him out on his extreme voting record.  As we have seen in past cycles, the opportunity to expose Scott Garret's radical policy positions is greatly diminished without debate.

Since Scott Garrett will refuse debate, as he has in past elections, it is essential that the Democratic nominee have the ability to argue for debate in the mass media.  In refusing the opportunity to appear in televised debate during the primary, Shulman has weakened his ability to make a principled argument for debate in a general election contest.

Further indication of vulnerability in a general election matchup against Scott Garrett can be found in Shulman's refusal to release head-to-head polling numbers.  This move is a stark contrast to Abate, who provided polling data indicating a potential victory over both Shulman and Garrett (Abate Polling Memo Attached).

Voters are fed up with Scott Garrett and will take viability seriously on June 3rd.  Democrats' thirsty for real change will vote Abate because only she has the courage to stand up to Bush style Republican Scott Garrett.  Abate has never backed down from a challenge and when Scott Garrett tries to avoid debate, Camille Abate won't take no for an answer.

jonas :: Shulman Snubs Media
Incumbent Republican Scott Garrett is in trouble

Scott Garrett is exceptionally vulnerable with his re-elect standing at a dismal 29 percent. Garrett, a conservative in a district that previously was represented by prochoice moderate Marge Roukema, is currently exhibiting some of the classic signs of a vulnerable incumbent: his job approval rating is below 50 percent (45 percent approve).

Given Garrett's poor performance numbers and the unpopularity of President Bush in the district, along with voters' extreme dissatisfaction with the way things are going both in the country (79 percent dissatisfied), and in this district of New Jersey (60 percent dissatisfied), and you have an electorate that is understandably looking for a change.  Indeed, the environment in this district of New Jersey is ripe for a well-organized Democratic challenger who can reflect the values of, and give authentic voice to, the middle class voters' angst over being squeezed.

While the two chief Democratic challengers start the race without strong bases of support, Camille Abate exhibits greater upside potential, as her profile resonates more strongly with primary voters, and a majority of general election voters move toward supporting her once they are informed of her biography. After hearing basic bio profiles of both Abate and her primary challenger, Abate moves into a strong lead: 39 percent to 27 percent. She has much stronger support among women voters, who make up close to 60 percent of the primary electorate, and has a significant lead among men.  

Abate's history and basic message of being a common sense fighter for the middle class resonates strongly in this district's primary and general election races.  After respondents hear Abate positives, she moves into an outstanding 15 point lead over incumbent Garrett: 47 percent to 32 percent. Abate's resume resonates especially strongly with Independents, 30 percent of whom shift support to her, including 33 percent of women Independents - showing significant weakness for Garrett.  

Abate's potential to strongly move the district's Independents, while appealing to the large number of women voters, gives Democrats an excellent opportunity to break the Republican hold on this seat in 2008. Abate is the Democratic candidate who can most authentically represent the ideals of the district's anxious middle class, but they just don't know it yet. However, with the proper resources and organization built around her, they will.

i Telephone interviews conducted March 24-27, 2008, with 400 randomly-selected likely Democratic primary voters, and 300 randomly-selected likely general election voters. Margin of error for primary election sample (400) is +/- 4.88 percent. Margin of error for general election sample (300) is +/- 5.65 percent.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
polling (4.00 / 1)
Further indication of vulnerability in a general election matchup against Scott Garrett can be found in Shulman's refusal to release head-to-head polling numbers.  This move is a stark contrast to Abate, who provided polling data indicating a potential victory over both Shulman and Garrett (Abate Polling Memo Attached).
This is silly. Head to head polling done after providing a candidate bio is not meaningful unless you expect to have the resources to actually have every voter with that bio in their minds as they're casting their vote in November.

Re: (4.00 / 2)
I think it's a big mistake for Shulman to turn down an opportunity to debate on tv. If this is true, they're turning down an opportunity to reach more voters in the district and build name recognition. Garrett will never agree to a televised debate.

Prediction Thread for the Primary? (4.00 / 1)
Shulman takes it by 15.

Shulman Can't Win The General If He's Afraid To Be On TV! n/t (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
I Wonder Why Shulman Would Refuse a Chance... (0.00 / 0)
...to be seen on TV engaged in a discussion with his opponent?

There is no good answer to that question.

I was looking forward to hearing these two excellent candidates "show us what they got".

We need a feisty candidate in the 5th that will energetically jab at Garrett until he comes begging for a debate....that's how vulnerable Garrett is.    But it's going to take an intelligently aggressive courageous risk taking opponent to win.

I would hate to to see 08 be a repeat of 06 in the 5th.

This is the year to fire Garrett!   Let's do it!!!


lol (4.00 / 3)
There is no good answer to that question.

And yet, you held/hold the position that Frank Lautenberg shouldn't have to debate Rob Andrews. Amazing!


[ Parent ]
Actually, My Position Is That.... (0.00 / 0)
Andrews is unworthy of being on the same platform as Loutenberg until and unless he answers all the unanswered questions about the unholy genesis of his campaign.

Those questions remain unanswered.

It's insulting to Dr Schulman to remotely compare him to Rob Andrews.

IF you actually read what I've said, I was for them having a debate, if only to demonstrate that Andrews still has hus "marbles".

As I've said, if Andrews' fantasy of Lautenberg crashing and burning by being exposed as less than competent at a debate were to come true; there's plenty of time to replace Lautenberg with a Pallone or a Holt or a Rothman......in other words someone worthy of respect.

I'm still waiting for someone to try to factually/truthfully answer all my questions as to precisely how and why Andrews got into this race and the precise timing thereof.

Remember folks, "a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds".   To take my positions in these two different cases and to try to spin them as something "amazing" in a derogatory sense; may work for you on a superficial level; but once you get past the surface....the fact remains that what Andrews did was sleazy and unethical and NO ONE so far has successfully been able to defend him.   Except by saying that it's "legal" to "change your mind".   Again, that kind of self serving evasion doesn't wash.

Andrews will lose big in June and he'll never be our governor.  Between his toadying up to the Bush administration in the run up to the war and his sneak attack on democracy (with the collaboration of the states most powerful political machines); he's toast....and deservedly so

Let's see who's "LOL" on election night!   :-)


[ Parent ]
Shulman/Abate to Debate May 20 (4.00 / 2)
No, it probably won't be carried on for a whole half-hour at noon on Sunday on Channel 9 - to be watched rapturously by what percentage of NJ-5 households, I wonder? - but I can hardly conclude by his unwillingness to appear on a fake NJ TV station's afterthought of a public service program that Dennis Shulman is engaged in a fatal avoidance of the press OR that he's unwilling to debate:

From the NJ Herald. Monday, May 12, 2008 By STEPHEN J. NOVAK snovak@njherald.com

Candidates for Congress will face off next week in a debate co-sponsored by the League of Women Voters of Sussex Highlands and The New Jersey Herald.

The debate on May 20 at 6:30 p.m. will showcase the U.S. House of Representatives candidates running for the Fifth and 11th Congressional Districts at Sussex County Community College's new Performing Arts Center in Newton.

Among the candidates confirmed to appear at the debate are Fifth District Democratic candidates Camille Abate, Roger Bacon and Dennis Shulman. In the 11th District, GOP candidate Kate Erber and Democratic candidates Ellen Greenberg and Tom Wyka have said they will attend.

I think the NJ Herald forum and subsequent articles will reach the western part of NJ-5 far more effectively than will a debate programmed for Sunday-at-noon-for-one-whole-half-hour-on-a-weekend-in-May ...


Be there! (4.00 / 1)
The NJLWV-Sussex Highlands Candidates Debate will be held on May 20, 2008 starting at 6:30 pm at the Sussex County Community College Performing Arts Center, Newton, NJ.

I will resist the temptation to quote Paul Simon ...

Do you suppose Channel 9 will send a remote team, or do you have to come to Secaucus to get coverage? I'm just asking ...


[ Parent ]
Featured Stories

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 Deciminyan
 Hopeful
 Jay Lassiter
 Jeff Gardner
 Jersey Jazzman
 KendalJames
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 the_promised_land
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Baristanet
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Daily Newarker
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Garden State Grapevine
» ClearysNoteBook
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazzman
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search












Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.



Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
7754 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.
Powered by: SoapBlox