5 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      

Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Podcast download time highlights evil of Verizon bill

by: jennypenny

Mon Jan 30, 2006 at 09:08:51 AM EST



I was just IMing with my friend who lives in the “hood” in Princeton (Maclean St.) and he was complaining because the BlueJersey podcast was taking so long to download.  He only has dial-up internet connection. How could this be??  It turns out that Verizon does not offer high-speed internet in his neighborhood.  They only offer high-speed internet where they think they can make a profit. 

Now Verizon wants to get a statewide franchise from our legislators.  They want to take over all of our communications with a legalized monopoly, putting all competition out of business with one easy bill.  They’re putting out press releases like this one claiming customers want this – while the competing cable companies, which on their website  Keep it Local produce another poll showing the opposite.

Verizon is fooling customers by promising them the moon and the stars in service, without mentioning the downsides. 

Wealthy customers and neighborhoods will continue to be favored while others will be neglected -- this might be ok when we're talking about some other market-driven service but not communication. 

Without competition, service will become even worse (as if Verizon service could become worse). 

With a statewide franchise, local public access channels will be dead.

But there are huge amounts of money involved and the legislation is backed by some Democrats. 
 

jennypenny :: Podcast download time highlights evil of Verizon bill
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Trying to be competitive with Cable (4.00 / 1)
I'm not sure why you think Verizon won't have competition - Cable TV companies would be their main competitor in this market.  We're talking mainly about Cablevision, Comcast, Adelphia and Patriot Media - all of whom offer digital cable TV, internet service, VOIP (internet telephony).

As for not offering high speed internet - it has a lot to do with your distance from the Central Office.  There are some places that are so far from the central office that unless Verizon were to upgrade the lines to digital they would NEVER get service.  I used to live in Robbinsville, which was served by the Hightstown CO.  Robbinsville is very affluent yet no one on the south side of Robbinsville could get high speed internet (DSL) from Verizon - and we're talking about an area that has recently been built up with houses that cost over 500K to buy.

People will be very slow to change from their cable service that works so well for the most part to Verizon's services.  Moreover- you could certainly choose to have digital cable TV services from your cable company and high speed internet from Verizon.  This is not a monopoly.  Cable franchises have had a relative monopoly on these services in each town as each town only gives franchise to one company - so why not let Verizon in the whole state at once.  It would certainly cause the cable companies to have to up their game.  Their only competition is Satellite - which does not offer very good high speed internet and VOIP telephony (though their TV is about the same).

So what's the problem?  If customers have more choice - doesn't everyone win?  If I understand this correctly, towns still have authority over right of way - so it's just basically saying Verizon can come in and offer the same services Cable TV can.

Am I missing something here?

--*Rob

PS - tell your friend in Princeton to investigate high speed internet through cable - Princeton is Patriot Media right?  They have high speed internet service as far as I know...
 


Lack of DSL is Not Based on "Hood" (0.00 / 0)
Wealthy customers and neighborhoods will continue to be favored while others will be neglected -- this might be ok when we're talking about some other market-driven service but not communication.

Princeton is one of the richest, most desireable communities in New Jersey.  DSL gets turned on at the switching station, so if one part of an area (more than just a town) gets DSL they all do.  It would be idiotic for Verizon to not offer it in one block and offer it in others.  The paperwork alone would be too much. 

And they are certainly not targetting wealthy areas and neighborhoods first, either.  Consider that Plainfield, North Plainfield, Dunnellen and Middlesex got DSL about 7 years ago when I first got it.  That is hardly the rich nexus of the state.

DSL is a business, and they want to make money.  They want to roll out DSL as fast as they can.  My bet is that the switching equipment that serves Princeton is very old and can't handle DSL.  They probably have to replace it all to offer it, and that's not in their capital plans right now.


Verizon's not in the Jackson-Witherspoon Neighborhood yet (0.00 / 0)
Verizon DSL is not yet offered in Princeton's Jackson-Witherspoon neighborhood.  Hmmm. In any event, there needs to be a balance here.  Yes, the cable industry's greed got us here.  But at the same time, Verizon has potential to monopolize the market (who wouldn't take advantage of paying their cell phone, home phone and cable bills all at one stop) and get us right back to square one.

Right, I know that Library Place and Moore St. have DSL (0.00 / 0)
but not the Jackson-Witherspoon Neighborhood, which is in between. 



[ Parent ]
Featured Stories

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 Deciminyan
 Hopeful
 Jeff Gardner
 Jersey Jazzman
 KendalJames
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 the_promised_land
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Baristanet
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Channel Surfing
» Deciminyan
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Garden State Grapevine
» ClearysNoteBook
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazzman
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search












Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.



Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
7968 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.
Powered by: SoapBlox