1 user logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      

Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

The Shame of Hackensack

by: Thurman Hart

Sun Apr 13, 2008 at 07:47:38 PM EDT



Update  The Star-Ledger has a short video that's worth seeing:

As far as I'm aware, nothing has changed.  Hackensack truly is the "city with no pity".  The Record asks the same thing I have:

Can the FAITH Foundation be saved?

Why not grant the storefront a variance? Or is the city's business community so opposed to its existence that such a request would be denied?


The conclusion is heart-rending as it is shocking: "Hackensack, it seems, no longer has room in its heart for [Robin Reilly]."
/update
Thurman Hart :: The Shame of Hackensack
For those who pay attention to such things, today is the Fourth Sunday of Easter.  Tradition has it that during this period between Easter and Pentacost, Jesus appeared to his faithful followers and shored up their faith, promising the Gifts of the Spirit to those who remained true, and charging them to continue his ministry to bring hope to the oppressed, food to the hungry, clothes to the naked, and peace and forgiveness to all who would accept it.

It also happens to be the week immediately preceding Passover - which in some Jewish households is a time of purification in which chametz is removed from the house (chametz is any product made with grain and yeast - and it can be burned, sold, or donated to the hungry).  Passover and Easter often coincide and are always somewhat near each other in our calendar, but it is somewhat moving to me to note that this purification for Passover is beginning on what Christians sometimes refer to as "The Sunday of the Sheep".

Big fat hairy deal.  This is a site about progressive politics, not faith.  And what does all this have to do with Hackensack.  Indulge me for a circuitous route.  

The Lectionary reading for the day says, in part:

2:19 For it is a credit to you if, being aware of God, you endure pain while suffering unjustly.

2:20 If you endure when you are beaten for doing wrong, what credit is that? But if you endure when you do right and suffer for it, you have God's approval.

2:21 For to this you have been called, because Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example, so that you should follow in his steps.

2:22 "He committed no sin, and no deceit was found in his mouth."

2:23 When he was abused, he did not return abuse; when he suffered, he did not threaten; but he entrusted himself to the one who judges justly.

Well, I'm about to fall well short of the standard set by Jesus.  I get more than a little upset when I find someone who is trying to take care of what Christians often refer to as "the least of these" - and gets a big wooden shaft planted up their keester by some dolt of a public official.  "Those to whom much is given, much is required" - and I was given this small little platform in Jersey's blogosphere.  And I'm swinging for the fence here.

That brings us to Robin Reilly.  Mike Kelly has the full story, but the short version is that Robin wanted to help the homeless people she saw on the streets of Hackensack - so she did something about it.  She did what the overwhelmed governmental services cannot do and what the private sector sees no profit in doing.  She took in homeless people right off the street, just as they were, and she gave them a place to call home - even if it was only for a few hours.  In the process, she broke a few laws - health codes, business codes, codes, codes, codes.

Yes, she broke several laws.  Yes, I'm generally a stickler for people paying the price for breaking laws, even if they do so for religious reasons.  But here is a case when enforcing the rules only spreads needless pain.  Here is a case where someone with a few extra brain cells orbiting their pre-frontal cortex should lean over to the mayor and say, "Look, exactly what THE FUCK is the problem here?  Could you please pull your head out of whoever's ass it is jammed in this week and get an waver passed?"

The person who needs to be saying that is YOU - every single person who reads this.  The Mayor of Hackensack is Jorge Meneses.  You can call the City of Hackensack at 201-646-3980 and ask that the mayor personally address this issue.  I don't care if you live in Atlantic City.  Call.  Tell Hackensack that you are ashamed that anyone in New Jersey would stand in the way of helping the people on which everyone else has turned their back.  Tell the mayor if he doesn't do something - and quick - you'll donate money to anyone who challenges him (even if it's Tom Kean, Jr.).

That's all it takes.  A simple waiver that says for this one case, we are going to look the other way.  Good God, if she had donated enough money to the county party, she never would have been in this position.  Instead, she has spent her money on taking care of the people the rest of us just don't want to see.  Credit in heaven is fine, but there's still a lot of work left to do on this side of the grave.

Yes, this story has taken on more than a little special meaning because of the timing, and I know that government is supposed to be blind to religion.  Fine.  What time is the right time for the government to step in and tell someone, "Look, you can't help the people we throw out on the street because you aren't actually selling furniture"?

If you don't have an answer, call 201-646-3980 and ask the Mayor to waive code enforcement on Robin Reilly's furniture boutique.  It's going to take a few minutes, but you'll feel better about the world - and your spot in it - if you do.

Just call.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Thurman, way to go, as always! (4.00 / 3)
I can't even begin to express how refreshing and often times deeply moving your posts are.

You show that progressives can be people of faith, and yes, even believe in God just like conservatives.  

By the way, I don't think people of faith or people who believe in God have any monopoly on ethical behavior whatsoever.  I say that as a person of faith who believes in God deeply, though my concept of God is a whole 'nother story.

I who knows many God-fearing or God-believing people who fall short ethically, and many athiests and agnostics who are titans of morality.

All I mean is that from your posts, we see that we progressives are a diverse bunch, ranging from the athiest to the agnostic to the religious.  The range is wonderful.  Thank you for being who you are and for being a vital voice in our progressive community.


You've done it again! (4.00 / 1)
I think it's one of Murphy's Laws: No good deed goes unpunished.


"Do what you can, with what you have, where you are."  (Teddy Roosevelt)

A Method To This Madness? (4.00 / 2)
I can't go into too many details here lest I violate someones privacy.  Suffice it to say that I've been making some efforts to assist someone who has been homeless in Bergen County over the last year.

They used this facility and were very grateful for its existence.   They always spoke highly of Robin and of the "vibe" of the place.

The reports I received of the quality of "care" and management at the official homeless shelter in Hackensack were abysmal.  

Some people actually chose the streets and the parks rather than to stay there.

As I understand it there is a fairly large new shelter being built in Hackensack.   I suspect there's a lot of money going into it.

What a contrast between the miniscule amounts of money this tiny little operation used and the high quality of actual caring that was/is received by the people needing the services provided.

Yet, here we have a county shelter, whose budget is orders of magnitude beyond what Robin has to work with...and has a facility so that some folks can stay and sleep overnight......yet the homeless would gravitate to the place where they actually felt more human.

I wonder if perhaps the "powers that be" somehow resented the fact that, here's this one older woman, who practically all by herself and for no pay and a tiny budget is doing a better job of serving this "population" than our expensive "program"?

In a sane world; the people now running the Bergen County Homeless Shelter would be replaced by Robin Reilly (if she wanted the job); or at the very least, her facility would be properly "licensed" and funded so that she could continue to operate on a larger and more secure scale.

There is no substitute for individual people who actually care about helping others becoming directly involved in providing services.   You really can't buy love.

But when you find a labor of love in progress; even a government should have the common human decency to nurture it as much as possible as opposed to destroying it out of a perverted application of laws intended to create order in the community not to wreak havoc on the lives of the "least among us".

The act of shutting down Robin Reilly's operation is cruel and unusual.  Shame on Hackensack.

The Mayor of Hackensack is Jorge Meneses.  You can call the City of Hackensack at 201-646-3980 and ask that the mayor personally address this issue.  I don't care if you live in Atlantic City.  Call.  Tell Hackensack that you are ashamed that anyone in New Jersey would stand in the way of helping the people on which everyone else has turned their back.  Tell the mayor if he doesn't do something - and quick - you'll donate money to anyone who challenges him (even if it's Tom Kean, Jr.).



Nick nails it (4.00 / 3)
Long comment, sorry.

I work for a social services agency that runs the largest homeless shelter in Philadelphia. I'm not going to go into the underfunded status of this facility or the delicate dance between meeting the needs of its users and the rules imposed by bureaucracy. I will repeat something Nick said:

Yet, here we have a county shelter, whose budget is orders of magnitude beyond what Robin has to work with...and has a facility so that some folks can stay and sleep overnight......yet the homeless would gravitate to the place where they actually felt more human.

What's happening in Hackensack is playing out all over the country - there is a new paradigm for caring for the homeless, the mentally ill, and the addicted, which could be inadequately summarized as 'People First.'

Unlike the traditional model, where you can't be drunk in the shelter, or you must take your meds to get into a supported living arrangement, or you've gotta hear the sermon before you get the soup,  "People First' says, you house 'em, feed 'em and respect them BEFORE you impose any rules or restrictions; they are not less worthy of dignity or assistance because they refuse (or are unable, which is more likely) to abide by bureaucrats' rules.  

The net outcome is remarkable - People First programs are typically more successful in helping to stabilizing people's lives, and the net benefit to society is immediate as people are cared for in whatever state they may be (and so aren't screaming, urinating, panhandling or cottaging where we would prefer they wouldn't).

But it's a new model. My agency is running a test program associated with the needle exchanges recently implemented in NJ; we're housing some IVDUs (intravenous drug users in English) in small apartments with absolutely no requirements that they be in treatment or otherwise clean up; and others in a similar environment where participation in treatment is a prerequisite to keeping the apartment (this is a simplification for the sake of space).

We expect the retention rate to be higher in the 'no treatment' program and that the eventual success rate in the 'no treatment' program to exceed that of the other (because people treated with dignity will come to their own truth about their addictions without coercion).

The lady in Hackensack is intuitively providing a need that is at the crux of the current debate in social services. She's totally right - and I hope the city fathers figure out a way to keep her open.


[ Parent ]
The Shame of Hackensack is Actually.... (0.00 / 0)
....the shame of the nation.   This situation is actually just another symptom of a systemic/cultural failure.  

Thank you for your understanding and your own good work.

People First.   What a concept!!!  


[ Parent ]
Thank you (4.00 / 2)
for writing about this topic and shedding some light on why these facilities do or don't work.  

My dad helps at the food pantry in Bergenfield and cooks often for the homeless but these are typically folks who are temporarily in a situation and need help - but they usually work and have the capacity to get themselves back on their feet.  

Thank you for shedding some light on those folks who have larger difficulties to face and even more to overcome.  It is hard to ask for help from a big beauracracy when there are strings attached and demands.  

The issues of mental illness and addiction complicate things, but the thing to remember is that these are people deserving of basic human dignity.  Recognizing that goes a long way toward helping them.

I often think that so many times Republicans think folks should pull themselves up by their bootstraps and they insist that nobody helped THEM get where they are.  I must remind them that no body comes into this world able to walk and talk and even feed themselves.  And rarely do many leave this world not confined to a sickbed and basically in the same condition.  We need help at several times in our lives.  All of us.  Try being in a hospital bed for 10 days and you know what it is like to surrender your dignity at the the door, when you need help just getting to the bathroom.  At several times in all of our lives we are helpless.

So I argue that no one makes it through this world completely on their own.  We all need help from time to time.  It's the human condition.  Let's try to make our assistance more human as well no matter what caused that need in the first place.

One Vote.  Yours.  It really does matter.


Something else to keep in mind (4.00 / 2)
Homeless shelters are only open during the evening and overnight. When the morning comes, out you go until the next night. Which is why a storefront 'boutique' drop-in center is so valuable - it's somewhere to be that's warm, welcoming and focused on accommodating you - which the park bench, the public library or the sidewalk in front of the liquor store may not be. That the Hackensack lady lets people keep stuff at the 'boutique' told me volumes about her - she knows what she's doing. Having a place to keep what little you own without having to watchdog it 24/7 is  one of those 'little' things most of us never even realize is a major blessing in our lives, one that the homeless don't have and deal with every day.

[ Parent ]
I'm going to play Devil's advocate here. (4.00 / 1)
I don't know if anything I'm about to say is true, but it's something to think about.

Clearly, the issue here is whether the laws on the books should be enforced in this particular case. However, given that there are laws regulating what can be done in what types of establishments, could the government be liable for failing to enforce them? In this case, it seems that the city is well aware that a storefront is being used for an alternative purpose. If it does fail to act and some type of accident happens, could the city be held liable in some way for failing to act pre-emptively by enforcing its own regulations?


I don't think so (4.00 / 1)
I've never heard of a city being sued for failure to enforce bld codes - which are a mixture of local and state laws.  I think there could be come concern that it would set a precedent for someone else to argue that it is being selectively enforced.  

In my experience, code enforcement is usually called in by a neighbor, or by an insurance company that doesn't want to renew a policy (or both).  I have no idea if that is the case or not.


[ Parent ]
OK I Called The Mayor (4.00 / 2)
He wasn't available to speak with me but a very nice lady named "Luz" (hope I spelled that right) took my "complaint".

She was aware of the situation.   I asked her go to this website and to print out the diary and the comments so that Mayor Meneses could read it all for himeself.

Who knows?  Maybe he'll respond with a comment!  Better yet, maybe he'll respond with some action to allow Robin Reilly's good work to continue uninterrupted.

We may not be able to make big change, fast here.....but I bet that a few hundred phone calls from progressives all over NJ would have some impact.   We can do that.  Yes we can.

If y'all haven't called, please do it....just be nice to Luz, it's not her fault.  :-)



From the news story (3.00 / 1)
Thanks for the link to the Record, Thurman.

Here's a quote from the article:

What has changed since the time the Hackensack City Council saluted Reilly for her work with the homeless? That was Mother's Day, 2005. Did anyone check her certificate of occupancy then?

What a bunch of hypocrites rule Hackensack!

"Do what you can, with what you have, where you are."  (Teddy Roosevelt)


Those poor people...just keep them out of my town, please (0.00 / 0)
I wonder how many BlueJersey readers would want their local municipal code enforcement people to hold the FAITH Foundation to the same standard if it was located in their community?

Does anyone think that local politicians - even those of a Democratic stripe - from one of the "Drinking Liberally" communities would welcome this sort of establishment?


Please explain (0.00 / 0)
what "same standard" you are talking about.  


[ Parent ]
Yes, I do think they would (4.00 / 1)
I live in Trenton (which has many homeless, addicted and mentally ill people and programs) so I cannot speak directly to what people in "those Drinking Liberally" towns might tolerate. I do think I can state with quite a bit of certainty - it's the business I'm in, after all - that there are mentally ill, addicted and homeless people, EVEN IN PRINCETON. Yes, there are. You betcha. And I have no idea if every outreach effort in those communities - and there are outreach efforts in every one of those "Drinking Liberally" communities, I assure you - can you prove otherwise? - is properly licensed and coded.

What I do know for sure is, is if Hackensack awards an out-of-code service provider "good citizenship" Mother's Day kudos one year and yanks her variance two years later, then something stinks in Hackensack.

On the topic of local politicians, anyone with any direct knowledge of the impacts of homelessness, addiction, mental illness, domestic violence, and so on - in short, any local politician with his or her freakin' eyes open - DO welcome these types of establishments. They support them and they fund them. Read your local and county budgets, they're in there. Look at who gets your Community Development Block Grant money, who gets  McKinney-Vento funding, who gets HUD and VA and Ryan White and SAHMSA and Section 8 money in your community. Look at your churches and community centers - that's where these programs are happening.  These programs typically keep low profiles because they are both NIMBY magnets and because they desire to treat their consumers with respect, but they're there. Smart local politicians both value and support them. And the competition to receive fundings for these programs is fierce, because THEY WORK. Even in Princeton, contra ... even in Princeton.


[ Parent ]
In Tenafly (0.00 / 0)
we have a Mayor and a former Chair of the Board of Adjustment who doesn't even want apartment dwellers or folks in 2 family homes here.   I doubt they'd let this woman even LIVE in town.

One Vote.  Yours.  It really does matter.

[ Parent ]
In A Perfect World... (0.00 / 0)
There would be zero need for any governmental "programs" to help people with broken lives.

As it is, Bergen County allocates millions of dollars to provide "services"...millions of dollars to build a new shelter for the homeless.

Here's a single "little old lady" who puts them all to shame by doing, on a shoestring, and for NO PAY a better job of providing critical help that the government can't/won't provide.

I'm sure that most of the people who are professional "social workers" started out as idealistic and from a genuine desire to help their fellow human beings....but what ends up happening (in too cases) is that the bureaucracy kills their souls and it becomes "just a job".  

Also, where ever there is a pool of millions of dollars to be spent, there will be graft, sweetheart deals, pay to play, cronyism etc, etc, etc.    

Money attracts corrupt politicians like shit attracts flies.    

The very existence of Robin's successful operation must have been an irritant and an embarrassment to all the "pros" who don't do as good a job as she does and get paid millions of dollars to fail where she succeeds.

Meanwhile, if she's shut down, what will these people do?   Where will they go?

How do you measure the value of a genuinely loving hug in the life of someone who is living on the street?

How many will turn to street crime out of sheer frustration and desperation?   Or drugs?   Or suicide?  

It always amazes me when I think about how we're willing to spend  thirty or forty thousand dollars a year to keep someone in prison who has committed a non violent property crime/theft of materials that may have a value of a few hundred dollars.....such is the prison industrial complex.  

The guards and the administrators and the suppliers and the builders/contractors don't consciously  see them selves as vampires feeding off of the unnecessary suffering of others; but, in some sense...that's what they are.    

This seemingly small story touches on a hundred other related threads/issues......and I don't have the time (or the capacity ;-)to provide "all the answers" in this kind of venue......but we really do need to take a close look at all the connections between human suffering and the ways government is corrupted by outright obvious means and by the cumulative effects of petty self serving inhumane bureaucracies simply protecting their own turf.

Meanwhile, have y'all called up the mayors office yet?  


Church on the Green reaches out (4.00 / 1)
to Robin Reilly and her homeless clients, yet the city is blocking that, too.  This is not about Robin Reilly serving food in a store front/drop-in center.  Her "competition" is an agency who called in that complaint.  She spoke out and helped someone who was being hurt by somebody who should have known better.  That is what her dilemma is about.  Hopefully, an agency that is investigating that situation will have public comments soon.  

Welcome To Blue Jersey, Karmak!!! Thanks... (0.00 / 0)
.....for re-minding us, on this Thanksgiving weekend, about this "old" story.

I would hope that you please write a new diary that will go into all manner of detail as to what's been going on with this situation since last April.   It seems you knw more than you said in your comment above.

Any "agency" that sees the Work of Robin Reilly as being some kind threat to them to the extent that they would "call in a complaint" is seriously messed up....and that's putting it politely.

This is what gives Democratic governance a bad name.  

Bureaucracies that are tasked to serve the people that are more concerned with preserving/expanding their own "turf" than they are with the best interests of human beings need to be held accountable.

This is like some good Samaritan taking the time and trouble to sweep up broken glass in the street being given a summons (on some trumped up charge) because the Department of Sanitation objected to having someone help them with their work.

Thank you, Karmac, for an opportunity to revisit this situation.


[ Parent ]
Some details (0.00 / 0)
Former Assemblyman Gordon Johnson held a series of meetings last summer, the topic of which was Police Brutality.  These were held in Hackensack and were sort of a word-of-mouth.  Robin attended with one of her clients, who had been placed in a safe house due to problems she experienced on the street.  The NAACP has taken over the case, but they are saying little at this point.  This client gave her story to The Record, and they have printed nothing on it.  

The Record did print a press release by a Hackensack realtor, who as part of the Upper Main Alliance, praised the "very difficult decision" to close FAITH in which he went on about how Reilly caused more problems for her clients than she helped them with.  The letter was identical to one written by BCCAP over a year ago.  The realtor described how Reilly's programs failed, yet he had never set foot in her door nor had he ever talked to her on the phone.

So - there is a big wall of blue and an agency that has a problem with Reilly, because reilly  knows of abuses in both systems.  And there are a lot of abuses in both systems.  Just ask any of the many homeless clients who were turned away from BCCAP, yet were able to turn their lives around with Robin, one who is planning on writing a book about his experience with the Bergen County social services programs, which he says, and this has been echoed repeatedly, keeps clients dependent on an abusive welfare system.  Your tax dollars at work.


[ Parent ]
Important Stuff! Nice Catch, Thanks!!! (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Featured Stories

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 Deciminyan
 Hopeful
 Jay Lassiter
 Jeff Gardner
 Jersey Jazzman
 KendalJames
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 the_promised_land
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Baristanet
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Daily Newarker
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Garden State Grapevine
» ClearysNoteBook
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazzman
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search












Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.



Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
7754 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.
Powered by: SoapBlox