6 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      

Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

The Lie of the "Weak on Corruption" AG

by: huntsu

Sun Oct 14, 2007 at 09:07:15 AM EDT



( - promoted by huntsu)

US Attorney Chris Christie has made a name for himself as the only prosecutor in the state who has taken on public corruption, largely because he repeatedly made the claim and the media printed it without checking.

This has been an extremely helpful theme for him, portraying himself as the lone gunman out to get the bad guys against a corrupt and weak establishment.  It works even better for this Republican prosecutor as the establishment is Democratic, since anyone who complains about Christie's tactics is immediately beaten down with Lonely Knight on a White Horse illusions.  Even some Democrats out there, and some of our commenters on this site, treat Christie as if he is the one true king come to save us all from public corruption.

No one can deny that Christie's office is doing an excellent job of nailing corrupt pols.  It started before Christie with the FBI investigating Jim Treffinger and Monmouth County corruption, two major investigations into Republicans Christie inherited but has used to bolster his bi-partisan armor.  To his credit, Christie has directed his teams -- prosecutorial and investigative -- to continue the effort.

But Christie has taken a particular glee in the fight, and used his bully pulpit excessively to promote himself, support members of his own party, and attack others.  Some of us consider it unseemly and borderline misuse of office, others consider it his due to beat his chest after vanquishing opponents.

But one major piece of his puzzle -- that he has been alone from the start -- appears to be a myth.  Christie's favorite target was Peter Harvey, who by all accounts wasn't a terribly good AG, for never doing anything to take on corrupt public officials.

But is that true?  Our investigation suggests it is not, and in fact is a gross misstatement of fact. 

The fact is that there were 41 convictions [see all here] of public corruption under Peter Harvey, who started in February 2003 and left in June 2006.  Many of these were small fry, as many of Chris Christie's have been.  However, there were also:

  • Hainesport Mayor and CFO for embezzling $339,000;
  • NJ Division of Taxation official Michael Johnson for stealing $81,000 in public money;
  • Democratic Assemblyman Anthony Imreveduto for misuse of campaign funds was kicked out of office;
  • Democratic Atlantic City Councilman Marty Small for tampering with election ballots;
  • Commerce Commission Chief of Staff Lesly Devereau for corruption and criminal conspiracy;
  • NJ Transit general manager and vice president Maureen Milan for taking bribes;
  • Many, many, many motor vehicle commission officials for selling false licenses to illegal aliens.

That's 41 in just over three years for Harvey, while Christie boasts repeated -- and his media friends repeat -- that he now has 120 in six years.  We found a total of 62 public corruption convictions from the AG's office since 2003, and there are more before that but the AG's website doesn't list them.  So, it is true that Christie has a larger number and some higher profile corruption cases, but there is a good reason for that.

Chris Christie is the only United States Attorney in New Jersey.  If there is going to be a case of corruption brought under federal law in this state it is going to be brought by the US Attorney, who since 2002 was Chris Christie.

The New Jersey Attorney General is only one of many prosecuting agencies in the state, but in addition to the Attorney General each county has it's own prosecutor with his or her own investigative team.  Most cases of local and county officials violations of state law are brought to court under the county prosecutor's office. 

These have brought significantly more cases to the fore.  A short review of just a couple county prosecutor web sites -- which are really weak -- found another 9 cases in the past couple years.  Since there are 21 county prosecutors, that adds up to quite a few other prosecutions.

We can't say for sure, but are pretty willing to bet that there are far more than 120 public corruption convictions brought by state and county officials over the past seven years.  All the 21 county prosecutors would need is three and a half each over those six years to reach that number.  Seriously, does anyone doubt that there weren't that many?  In relatively quiet Somerset County there were two Mayors forced to resign after convictions, the son of the Freeholder's Chief Clerk caught stealing from county property, a police officer nailed for stealing airline miles, and the recent park scandal. 

So it's pretty much a foregone conclusion that prosecutors appointed by the Governor (AG and county prosecutors) have nailed more corrupt public officials and employees than the US Attorney's office.  Yet the myth of the Lone Anti-Corruption Knight Templar Chris Christie  continues.

A good bit of this comes from the fact that Peter Harvey was largely incompetent and screwed up some high-profile cases, and was himself caught in unethical though not illegal situations.  Further, Christie and Harvey had a massive personality conflict that caused the two to go after each other quite often.

But the "accepted wisdom" that came out of these facts is sorely mistaken, no matter how often reporters, editors and columnists repeat it.

There is a massive corruption issue in New Jersey, one that is being addressed at all levels.  Christie is not the sole fighter in the battle, but simply the loudest and most noticeable.

huntsu :: The Lie of the "Weak on Corruption" AG
Tags: , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Corruption is rampant; systemic woes need drastic remedies (0.00 / 0)
Not bad. I almost welcome this diary, Huntsu. You went through a lot of investigative trouble to prove a point. Good work.

Of course, it goes without saying that I disagree on the fundamentals of your approach against the U.S. Attorney. But the point you have proven here is that corruption is rampant and systemic. And that's a good thing to shine the light on.

I am very happy that you have illustrated that the war against corruption is being waged at multiple levels of government. And I am very happy that you paint a clear picture of the examples of ethical problems the state has been wrestling with in every nook and cranny.

I can assure you that I am cheering for every level of law enforcement in their efforts to root out the dark princes of corruption. And I am pleased that you see the value in their doing that.

I still think Peter Harvey was a disgrace in the AG's office. Zulima Farber was a big zero. But now I am more than willing to give General Milgram a chance to prove that her administration is on the corruption watch.

To tell you the truth, I like her and I have heard rumblings from inside the AG building that she is kicking butt, taking names and restructuring the office to do the job. Go, Anne, go!

But none of this need denigrate the exemplary work of Christopher Christie whose efforts serve as the gold standard in corruption busting. I do not see the value in attacking a great crime fighter who has thankfully used the bully pulpit to educate the public and motivate other officials to recognize the horrifying cancer of corruption in our midst. Mr. Christie understands the moral imperative to speak out.

I am pleased that his success and profile serves as a model for our children, instilling the values of integrity, honesty and decency in their lives.


I Resent Your Cloaking Yourself In The Language.... (4.00 / 1)
......of reform, while still, in effect, adopting a transparently pro-Christie, pro- Republican agenda.  The issue of corruption is too important to be muddied/clouded up in that manner.

I really don't know if you're a Democrat who just happens to have a crush on Christie or if you're a Republican playing head games with us.

Either way, you have never addressed  the legitimate critique/questions that Huntsu's numerous diaries have raises re Christie; while simultaneously repeated ad nauseum a series of mantras telling us what a "wonderful wizard" Christie is.  It doesn't wash. 

Whether you're a sincere "true believer" or a cynical PR flack on someones payroll; the functional/net result is the same; a stalking horse for Chris Christies political ambition.


[ Parent ]
You've missed a lot (0.00 / 0)
Not bad. I almost welcome this diary, Huntsu. You went through a lot of investigative trouble to prove a point. Good work.

You should go back to last February and see all the other research we've done.  There's a good reason why we feel the way we do about Christie, and it's not partisanship. 

There's plenty of research and compilation of Christie's record on this blog, things that disprove a lot of the popular narrative about the person you think sets the "gold standard."

We did a ton of research on this issue, and it is all linked and sourced.  You're welcome to review it and come to you own conclusions.

But after nine months of this we've come to ours, and that's why we write the way we write now.  We came to this as skeptics, and now believe Christie is misusing the public trust.


Media vs. Substance (0.00 / 0)
This article was much needed in isolating the differences between the duties and cases (many more) for the state Attorney General vs. that for a federal U.S. attorney such as Christie. Christie's posturing and public persona, which are seemingly unheard of in other states, makes him appear to be the lone savior of corruption in the state, despite evidence from the Harvey and Milgram administrations.

If Christie would use his office for less overtly-partisan purposes, he would have much more credibility, even though I also agree that he is doing a good job in nabbing corrupt pols. I'm still waiting on the press releast about Barbera's arrest.


Christie Isn't Going After Systemic/Organized Corruption (4.00 / 1)
In NJ it's almost easy to pursue the most blatant cases of sheer greed, stupidity, hubris and petty arrogance that manifest as corruption.  And, of course it's great that some of these jerks get busted now and then; but that leaves the interlocking networks of mutually reinforcing endemic corruption untouched.

There are hundreds of tips/calls that go into Christies office (and the FBI) re all manner of shenanigans in NJ governance that don't result in prosecution.

A really effective US Attorney would go after NJ corruption the way they go after a drug cartel.....you start with the small fish and work up.

In my humble opinion, there are probably thousands of office holders and/or public officials at all levels of NJ governance who (if the full truth ever was known) could be prosecuted for violations of law.

A place to start would be a massive public relations campaign/appeal to every citizen/employee to "drop a dime" on the creeps who screw all of us. 

As it is now, most of the public thinks really cleaning up NJ is a hopeless lost cause and most of the honest decent workers know enough to "go with the program" lest they become the victim of harassment, retaliation and dismissal.

There's an election coming up so Christie releases a flurry of activity to make political hay; that's all I see.  Meanwhile the entrenched systemic corruption goes on unabated.

Those who display a sycophantic "appreciation" of Chris Christie combined with a sharp focus on corruption in the Democratic ranks are, despite their superficially righteous rhetoric, merely enabling/supporting the status quo.  It's transparent.

The case Hunstu, and others, have made is strong; the fact that NJ's mainstream media haven't picked up the ball tells us that they care more about the needs of their owners/advertisers than they do about their own journalistic integrity.

The body politic has lost it's immune system; it's not really surprising that we suffer from the "opportunistic infection" of systemic corruption.

The people stealing us blind are not geniuses.  They're just greedy ruthless amoral bullies taking advantage of the fact that they can get away it.  We're in a place where the thieves actually sincerely feel entitled to continue their bloodsucking ways and have constructed interlocking infrastructures that whitewash the theft with numerous coats of ersatz legality.

The only chance for any real change/reform is if/when "we the people" actually take back our own government.  It's not going to come from the "top" "down".



They don't call it "systemic" for nothing (0.00 / 0)
I thought you were smarter than that, Nick. That's a shame.

Most of the type of corruption that you refer to and whine that Christie does not address, lies within the system itself. That's why they call it "systemic".

And the system is set up so that ethically challenged pols can engage in all sorts of unsavory practices that are LEGAL. Hence, "Legalized Bribery". I thought you understood this concept.

In order for the system that protects such LEGAL bribery to be changed to make what is currently legal into something that is ILLEGAL, you need the public officials in charge of the place to change the laws. Is this too complicated for you?

Christopher Christie does not have the power to change laws. Lawmakers can change laws. Stop me if I am going too fast for you.

So when you cry about Christie not busting the kind of systemic corruption that is rampant through New Jersey, you are really referring to the Legalized kind of bribery schemes that have yet to be addressed by the Governor and the legislature.

I don't give two hoots of an owl if you don't believe me, but I am a dyed in the wool Democrat who has voted in Democratic primaries for over 20 years. I was even a Deaniac long before it became fashionable.

Laying that out on the table, I also comprehend that the people who have the majority and the power to change laws in NJ happen to be Democrats at this time. So it must be Democrats who need to change the system to outlaw legalized bribery and a host of other ethically borderline practices. Not Chris Christie. Democrats, plain and simple.

All Christie can do is use his bully pulpit to stimulate public outrage which in turn would help to force the Democratic leadership and officials in charge to take the actions necessary to change these laws. Get it? I thought this was apparent. Apparently, you haven't figured it out.

To quench your partisan thirst, I will also say that when the Republicans were in charge during the Whitman years, they too failed to take action to change these laws and curb these practices. Happy that I said that? It's true. But I really just want to make you happy.

To me, corruption busting and the great work of Mr. Christie should be a non-partisan issue. His use of the bully pulpit should be considered a non-partisan mission for the greater good. He is speaking to the leadership with the power to make these changes. And they happen to be Democrats.

Get it?


[ Parent ]
Glad We Flushed You Out A Bit..... (0.00 / 0)
.......you sound more real now.  Thank you.

Yes I understand the distinctions between de jure and de facto corruption.

However, Christie does in fact have at least one weapon at his disposal to make cases against the corruption that consists of arguably "legal" activity.  That is, situations in which each discrete component of corruption presents, on its face, as legal; but when seen as part of a whole picture it's essentially organized crime.

That tool is called the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations  Act.  RICO statutes for short.  Behind the superficially legal activities lie all manner of "understandings" that amount to kick backs, sweetheart deals and illicit cronyism (as opposed to run of the mill patronage).

There exist established networks of vendors, contractors, law firms etc etc etc and officials who form daisy chains of mutually enriching relationships throughout the state, and the nation for that matter.  And it pervades of BOTH parties!!!

The recent press conference that the Weinberg Team gave just presented one grain on the beach worth of documentation for the kinds of patterns of corruption that could be prosecuted under RICO.

Yes, the cases would be hard to make; but all it takes is a few "cracks" in the form of underlings spilling some beans and the whole thing could be opened up wide.

Christie is part of the Republican/Bushian establishment. 

That's the same establishment that's giving us this insane "war" (read trillion dollar boondoggle) in Iraq.  You know; the place where 9 Billion dollars in cash simple disappeared? http://blog.foreignp...

Terry, the people behind Chris Christie make Joseph Ferierro and his ilk look like boy scouts stealing extra napkins from a diner.

Systemic corruption is a non partisan category.  Christie is a creature of partisanship.

The dozens of diaries that Huntsu and others have given us make that case overwhelming.  Now if you can go back and effectively deconstruct all the fact patterns and logic behind that material, be my guest.

When Bush/Gonzales fired all the US attorney's for, in effect, being too honest and diligent; that left a taint on all the remaining US Attorney's.

I would love to be proven wrong about Christie. 

I would love to wake up one day to see a RICO bust of a whole network of organized political criminality.  That would consist a hundreds of people being arrested, and brought to justice through a trial and a verdict; not just a few odd fools "investigated" here and there.

Ultimately, what's needed is 100% public financing of campaigns combined with truly draconian sentences for anyone found guilty of violating the public trust.

The highest tax we all pay is the corruption tax.  It's a tax paid in money, blood and, ultimately; with democracy itself.


[ Parent ]
Except for one thing (4.00 / 1)
All Christie can do is use his bully pulpit to stimulate public outrage which in turn would help to force the Democratic leadership and officials in charge to take the actions necessary to change these laws. Get it? I thought this was apparent. Apparently, you haven't figured it out.

Christie attacks Democratic legislators when they use Senatorial Courtesy on Stu Rabner, but not Republican legislators when they use it on county prosecutors.

Christie attacks Democratic leaders for not using the language Christie prefers when talking about indicted pols, but doesn't attack Republicans.

Christie sends out press releases on indictments of Democrats but the same day doesn't send on on the arrest of a Republican.

Christie was told he was not in the running for the US Attorney job, then he and his brother donated more than a half million to the Republican Party and the Republican President appointed him in an apparent quid pro quo.

Christie swears in Republican elected officials, goes on television shows with Republican legislators, donates hundreds of thousands of dollars to Republicans, etc.

You view it as a good thing that he is talking about corruption, and because of that are willing to ignore the fact that the manner in which he is doing it is partisan and benefits his party over his opponents' party.

To me, that is like supporting a cop who is taking on the mob but taking bribes on the side.

Just because the cop is doing good work against the mob doesn't mean he isn't engaged in corrupt acts himself.

That's what I and a lot of other people see here.  You can argue the ends justify the means, but I say if you are anti-corruption you should be anti-corruption.


[ Parent ]
Huntsu, Your Efforts In Bringing Light To Christie's... (0.00 / 0)
......record may turn out to be instrumental is sparing New Jersey from a Christie (i.e. Bushistic) governorship. 

Thank You!


[ Parent ]
Featured Stories

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 Deciminyan
 Hopeful
 Jay Lassiter
 Jeff Gardner
 Jersey Jazzman
 KendalJames
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 the_promised_land
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Baristanet
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Daily Newarker
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Garden State Grapevine
» ClearysNoteBook
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazzman
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search












Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.



Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
7752 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.
Powered by: SoapBlox