6 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      

Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

What to do with the Marlton Circle

by: Jason Springer

Mon Oct 22, 2007 at 07:27:15 AM EDT



njdotoverpass The Current Marlton Circle
There is currently a debate going on about what to do with the Marlton Circle.  The NJ Department of Transportation would like to move forward on their plans to install an overpass lifting Route 73 over Route 70, however concerned residents have been questioning whether an at grade intersection, similar to those that have replaced the circles in Medford, Berlin, Ellisburg and the Race Track in Cherry Hill would provide a better solution.

The residents have established a website, Marltoncircle.com, spoken with local elected officials, conducted a letter writing campaign, and have been collecting petition signatures to try and stop the planned overpass which they believe is being forced on the community by the NJ Department of Transportation. 

smartintersection Residents are Suggesting an at-Grade Intersection

They cite maintaining the character of the town, the impact the new design will have on local busineses, whether it will actually resolve traffic congestion and the potential savings of an at-grade project as reasons the current plan should not go forward.

This has been a decades long debate and discussion about planning along with funding for the project and if you follow me below the fold, I will try to explain how we got to this point today.

Jason Springer :: What to do with the Marlton Circle
On three separate occasions, December 16, 1997, December 21, 1999 and February 15, 2000 the Evesham Township Council passed resolutions supporting what was known as the original improvement Plan Alternate A which called for the DOT to move forward with the "design and construction" of an at-grade intersection to replace the Marlton Circle.

MarltonCircle2 NJDOT's proposed overpass lifting Route 73 over Route 70

Then, after these past resolutions affirming support for the plan for an at-grade resolution, the council suddenly passed a resolution on June 19, 2001 voicing support for what is known as Improvement Plan Alternate 3b which proposes an overpass.  This resolution however, unlike the previous only called for a study and to proceed with further design of the project, not voicing support for construction of the new plan.  That resolution was contingent on studying the potential impact the new plan would have on local businesses and to take into consideration 8 nearby intersections and traffic from "pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular circulation".  The 2001 resolution also directed NJDOT to study the 8 nearby intersections for the traffic impact, but they contend that they can't do anything about them until after they construct the overpass.  Isn't this a backwards plan?  Don't you check the impact before you do the work?  And when is the last time they did an updated traffic flow study or are they using the numbers from the original plan over 10 years ago? I would think such a study should include not just the Circle but, comprehensive studies that evaluate the full length of 70 and 73 running from one border of Evesham to the other in all 4 directions, not just a 1/2 mile stretch when you already know there are problems surrounding it.  There should be a  comprehensive look at the surrounding effects as well, not the piece mail effort that seems to be in place. 

From 2001-2006, there were no resolutions passed regarding the circle, so no support for the construction of an overpass had been given.  In 2006, the council passed another resolution amending the prior resolution regarding the Improvement plan for Design of the Marlton Circle as currently presented upon the condition that the main entrance to the BMW dealership that was there was improved for entry and exit.  Well the BMW dealership isn't there anymore, so problem solved right?  Well not if you want to have another business providing ratabales to the town utilize the location and there is still no resolution supporting the construction of the overpass, just one to study the design.  So how then was NJDOT authorized to do the construction is the question that the residents behind MarltonCircle.com are asking?  Thats not stopping the DOT because according to the Marlton Telegram,

NJDOT is scheduled to award a contract for this project in late June 2008 and construction is scheduled for completion in late 2010 said department spokeswoman Erin Phalon.

The residents preferring an intersection have some ideas of their own for the estimated $40-$50 million the overpass would cost - like using the savings to improve other intersections with major congestion problems like 73/Brick and 73/Evesham.  They say:

Our plan involves a much less expensive and much shorter construction period while calling attention to the fact that NJDOT's overpass plan will not reduce congestion within or beyond a one mile radius of the location where Routes 70 and 73 intersect.

Our quick, simple, inexpensive and logical plan has a few important key elements:

  ·  "Smart Lights" (Actuated Lights) to sense real-time traffic volume to maximize the flow of traffic in each direction so it may quickly go straight, turn left or make a U-Turn.

  ·  Right turn on red" that branch prior to the intersection allow 2 lanes to be used for traffic going straight, moving a greater volume of traffic thru with each green light.

  ·  U-Turns to be made from the far left lane (along with the traffic turning left) - that blend into the center lane of the adjacent 3 lanes to avoid extremely severe U-Turns.

  ·  Long vehicles (such as semi-trucks and buses) to be prohibited from making U-Turns at the "Intelligent Intersection".

The Current Evesham Council, which is comprised of members not involved in the original process are now seeking input from the residents and looking to make a decision going forward said Mayor Randy Brown...

"Every e-mail I've gotten, they've all been in favor of one thing, they've all agreed, the Marlton Circle has outlived its use," he said.

The next council meetings will go a long way in determining the future of a major traffic hub in South Jersey.  If you'd like to have your voice heard, apparently now is the time to speak up.  The Council and DOT say they are listening.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Man, I hate that circle (4.00 / 1)
When I lived in Manahawkin and commuted to Haddonfield and Philadelphia, there it was: the last and worst of three circles, beginning with Rts. 70 & 72 waaay back in the Pines, and Rts. 72 & 206 in the middle.

I watched the evolution of Rts. 1 & 130 in North Brunswick from its origin as a classic traffic circle in the early 1960s to its eventual complete redesign as a high speed expressway flyover - and if South Jersey wants to avoid the eternal pain of the Marlton circle being repaired and corrected every decade for the next 40 years, I would avise you all to bite the proverbial bullet and go for the big fix now. That circle has already been f***ed with multiple times to no great effect, as traffic always expands to outstrip the added capacity each minor revision creates. I have taken the verbal tour of its devolution, complete with aerial photographs, with the owner of Olga's Diner - and while the Diner will probably go the way of the late, much lamented Middlesex Diner if the full flyover is pursued,  so it goes.

Put Rt. 72 over the top, put Rt. 73 underneath, take the land needed to build the cloverleafs, and get it the hell over with.

At-grade crossing ... dear god ... good luck with that. You'll be doing it again by 2015 ...

 


Oops. Rt. 70/73, not 72/73 (0.00 / 0)
I always think of the whole highway from LBI to the BFB as Rt. 72, but that's my Ocean County bias showing. Of course, Rt. 72 ends at its intersection with 70 in Woodland Township.

NJDEM.... (0.00 / 0)
....if this scheme goes forward, you can turn your condo into a roadside taco and smoothie stand for commuters stranded in traffic.

but seriously, this intersection is a mess.  the only time it's not a mess is in the middle of the night.

a public works project of this magnitude would be a major messs.  perhaps a nescesary mess, but a mess nonethelesss.

activist for hire.Follow jay_lass on Twitter


don't have an opinion (0.00 / 0)
except to say that I've been there a few times, and that circle is awful.


Frank LoBiondo Record and Jon Runyan Watch

Convencies, Inconveniences (0.00 / 0)
This intersection is indeed a bit of a nightmare, but I didn't know the convoluted history behind the Marlton Circle until njdem's detailed post on the matter.

For Rt. 70, the overpass plan seems to be connected to Cherry Hill township's plan not to allow pass throughs on Rt. 70, which are basically u-turns that local residents need.  Rt. 70 need not become a mere highway, since just off its busy pavement so many great towns (Marlton, Cherry Hill, Haddonfield, etc.) are located.  In essence, I'm concerned about local control being superceded in these matters by state entities, whether it is NJDOT and the overpass idea or the lack of cut throughs.


Featured Stories

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 Deciminyan
 Hopeful
 Jay Lassiter
 Jeff Gardner
 Jersey Jazzman
 KendalJames
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 the_promised_land
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Baristanet
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Daily Newarker
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Garden State Grapevine
» ClearysNoteBook
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazzman
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search












Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.



Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
7752 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.
Powered by: SoapBlox