2 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      

Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Op-Ed: New Jersey Marriage '08 - Start Your Engines

by: Evan Wolfson

Sat Jan 06, 2007 at 08:37:30 AM EST



( - promoted by jay lassiter)

When Governor Corzine signed New Jersey's civil union bill into law late last year, he kicked off the next and last stage of the work to secure the full measure of protection and dignity that is every family's due, and which civil union fails to deliver. And so we turn now to the months of persuasion and persistence needed to win all committed couples in New Jersey the freedom to marry, shimmering within our reach.

Fortunately, we have a lot on which to build. First, thanks to Lambda Legal's case, the unanimous ruling of the NJ Supreme Court, and the creative and constant public education and outreach by Garden State Equality and its amazing array of gay and non-gay organizations and partners - including BlueJersey.com, and its series of engaging ads - it's clear that the people of New Jersey are ready to accept an end to the exclusion of same-sex couples from marriage. Had the legislative leaders and the governor stepped forward following the Supreme Court ruling and said that the time is now for full equality, not place-holders, New Jersey would have embraced it (and rapidly come to see, as have the people of Massachusetts, that equality in marriage means families helped and no one hurt; gay couples don't use up all the marriage licenses and there is plenty of marriage to share).

Unfortunately, NJ's political leaders seized on the unsurprising polls that showed that in the immediate aftermath of the decision, a majority was also comfortable with the intermediate step of a parallel, lesser status, and they rushed to that place-holder. Happily, an intense blitz by Garden State Equality, Lambda Legal, and an unprecedented collaboration of movement organizations (the Task Force, HRC, ACLU, MassEquality, and New York's Pride Agenda) and funders made clear to the politicians that those of us committed to equal treatment and full inclusion will not rest until couples have the freedom to marry itself. As a result, Senate President Codey and Assembly Speaker Roberts, along with many other key legislators and leaders, have now acknowledged that marriage itself is the goal, that it is do-able, and that it must be done - soon.  Gov. Corzine has already promised to sign a marriage bill into law.

Garden State Equality has called on all who believe in fairness to hold these leaders to their word, and, with the help of all of us, has pledged a massive effort to win the freedom to marry in New Jersey within the next two years.

As the new year dawns, we begin building on the foundation of civil union already won and the increasing receptivity to marriage equality. We must coax people past complacency or false comfort in the idea that justice is "inevitable" and therefore can wait.  Like Chief Justice Poritz, in her dissent for the three justices who would have finished the job, we must now talk to the people around us about why marriage matters.

The right way to end discrimination in marriage is, of course, to end discrimination in marriage, not repackage it, whether as civil union or any other mandatory other status.

Under American law, marriage, of course, is a civil union (a legal status created by government license) - but civil union is not marriage, and pointedly so.  There are a million songs about love and marriage, but civil union is the words without the music.  We must explain why the separate and unequal status of civil union is insufficient and unnecessary, and ultimately demeaning when offered, as it was last year, in order to perpetuate couples' exclusion from marriage itself.

Person by person, month by month, let's describe how marriage - and only marriage, not civil union - offers a comprehensive array of protections and responsibilities under state, federal, and international law.  As I relate in my book, Why Marriage Matters: America, Equality, and Gay People's Right to Marry, this safety net affects every area of life from birth to death, with taxes in between. The rules relating to marriage (not civil union) have been worked out through courts and legislatures to cover a multitude of contingencies, and cannot be replicated by any other contract, statute, or new invention by the state. No separate status provides that security and economic justice, not to mention the dignity of full inclusion and cultural meaning, to same-sex couples and their kids. Around the world, everyone knows what marriage entails. No newly invented status brings what comes, tangibly and intangibly, with a legal marriage license and the two words, "I do."

To be denied the vocabulary of marriage and its meaningful, resonant, and readily understood statement of love and commitment - and instead, have to fumble for 10 documents, explain a new term that doesn't even have a verb, and, possibly, retain a lawyer just to protect your family in a time of crisis - is not fair and not equal. New Jersey can do better. And now is the time.

So here's a New Year's Resolution for all of us. Join with Garden State Equality and other New Jersey and national gay and non-gay groups dedicated to this just cause. Seize the opportunity to make a difference. Start now by inviting friends, family, and fellow citizens to ask themselves these questions:

Either marriage and civil union are the same, in which case why does NJ need two lines at the clerk's office, or they are not the same, in which case what are you withholding from these NJ families, and for what reason?

Would you be prepared to swap your marriage for a civil union?

Have you shared that news with your spouse?

We can win the freedom to marry in New Jersey within a matter of months, if we do our part. People are ready to rise to fairness. Will New Jersey beat California, Connecticut, Maryland, New York, Vermont, and the other states (and countries) moving forward to marriage equality? That is up to Corzine, Codey, Roberts - and you.

Evan Wolfson is Executive Director of Freedom to Marry and author of Why Marriage Matters: America, Equality, and Gay People's Right to Marry (Simon & Schuster 2004), now in paperback.

Evan Wolfson :: Op-Ed: New Jersey Marriage '08 - Start Your Engines
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Great Post (3.00 / 1)
Every legislator in New Jersey should be asked those questions.

I'm annoyed with those who say government should get out of the marriage business all together and just issue civil unions. Government in marriage has served straight couples just fine! Do you want to be the one to tell grandma and grandpa that their marriage is nullified and they now have a civil union? No, because that is ridiculous. Let all couples marry.


I totally agree with you, Jack (0.00 / 0)
By the way, if folks think the national poll numbers are tough on marriage equality - but getting better everyday and far better already in New Jersey - they're a walk in the park compared to the notion of having our government do civil unions only and getting out of the marriage business. 

[ Parent ]
I think the government should stay out of the religious part of marriage (0.00 / 0)
I think the distinction between the legal contractual agreement part of marriage and the religious part of marriage needs to be made.  The word "marriage" has with it both secular (contractual) and religious components (by implication- for most people).  The government should have nothing to do with the religios part of it.  If the two components weren't so entertwined the way they are in the current understanding of 'marriage' then the government could deal only with the contractual part like it is supposed to.  The greatest argument against marriage equality usually boils down to religious arguments.  There is absolutely no logical or lawful basis on which to deny gay couples the contractual rights of marriage.  However, individual religions may think of marriage however they wish.  And yes, this includes religions that recognize gay marriages. 

Agree, but still (0.00 / 0)
It's a lot easier to help people understand that government only deals in civil marriage than to abolish all current civil marriages for civil unions. So you can see why the government-out-of-marriage crowd is annoying.

[ Parent ]
Start by appropriating the word (0.00 / 0)
As someone who examines American social issues mostly through the  prism of religion, I reluctantly came to the conclusion that there is no such thing as "civil marriage." Marriage is a word so loaded with sentiment - religious & other, that Evan himself  defines it as a  "meaningful, resonant, and readily understood statement of love and commitment."  Try putting that in a law.  It's not what Laurel Hester was pleading for last year. The first thing Jersey's gay & lesbians must do is take advantage of the new law, for the sake of their legal rights.  The second thing they must do  is call it "marriage" - drape all the trappings of marriage on it, from the ceremony to rings to how you regard & refer to your relationship.  Be married. Take possession of the word & make everyone  understand that you intend to keep it & use it regardless of what's printed the legal contract. & go from there.

Civil Marriage (4.00 / 1)
Let's call it what it is! It is a civil marriage contract! That is why secular public officials can preside over such unions. Religion has no monopoly on it! No Roman Catholic priest will preside over a Baptist wedding or a Jewish wedding or Buddhist wedding or vice-versa.

Each state has their own "secular" and legal standards to qualify. Why is there this great blur of facts that makes this a religious issue? Where is the religious outcry over Elvis Presley look-alikes performing weddings, or places and people that bring marriage down to the level of picking up a meal at a fast food joint.

It all comes down to framing and then looking at the real facts!

I realized this almost 40 years ago when I got married on a Saturday night in June. In those days the protocol was to have a large buffet/cocktail hour and then the ceremony and then the formal wedding reception and banquet. Needless to say it was a long and hot day, I was so nervous that I took at least three showers. Just as the cocktail hour started, the Rabbi called me and some of the wedding party into a room to sign and witness some papers and then sent them on for my future spouse to sign. When the papers came back, he signed them put them in a stamped envelope and sent one of the ushers to drop the envelope in the mailbox.

When the usher came back, I realized that at that point, it was a "fait accompli", a "done deal", at least in the eyes of the State of NJ. With a great deal of nervousness and anxiety gone, I decided to enjoy the cocktail hour and when I finally did walk down the aisle to take the religious vows, I was quite "loose", since I was already "hooked". Legally it did not matter.

Today, as one who is widowed with children and grandchildren and assets to protect, if I were to remarry, it would be necessary to have a pre-nuptual agreement, and I'm sure my future mate would also have need for such to protect their assets and estate for their family. In other words, we'd most likely need special modifying contracts in addition to the basic marriage contract.

If protecting social security payments, perhaps an alternative since I'm well over 62 and most likely be with another senior, I might consider entering into a domestic partnership and then having a religious wedding to sanctify the relationship. That might make the most dollars and cents! I could say I was married, but not be penalized by it. I could have my cake and eat it so to speak.

I haven't even gotten to the point of defining who can enter into the civil marriage contract. National legal experts have assured me that if I cannot marry in New Jersey, there are several very socially conservative counties in Texas that would (perhaps reluctantly) allow me marry a person of my life-long sexual orientation.

It is time to separate religious marriage and each religion's standards and laws with civil marriage and each state's laws. It is time to take control of framing the issue!

Barbra Casbar

 

"Discrimination caused by ignorance and fear is a tax on human progress" - Barbra Casbar Siperstein


[ Parent ]
Love the questions (0.00 / 0)
I tried them out on some friends yesterday, and they found them to be very powerful.

The word "marriage" matters. (0.00 / 0)
The word "marriage," of course, is important.  With it comes the status of the term we commonly use for the life-long commitment to another, and society's undiluted recognition of that commitment.  To grant gay couples the rights of married people but to call it "civil unions" is to refuse to call it "marriage," thereby ensuring that it is in fact NOT equal. The legislature's choice of a different label for the unions of gay people was, inherently and on its face, an intentional act of discrimination, a governmental pronouncement:  "You are not fully the same."  To state the obvious, the government itself should never be the agent of denigrating discrimination.  When this happens, we are all-straight and gay-impoverished.

sometimes it's hard... (0.00 / 0)
...to focus on the positive when you have idiots like this [http://www.youtube.c...] singing about how detestable we are.  *sigh*  But thanks for the posting.

Featured Stories

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 Deciminyan
 Hopeful
 Jay Lassiter
 Jeff Gardner
 Jersey Jazzman
 KendalJames
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 the_promised_land
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Baristanet
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Daily Newarker
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Garden State Grapevine
» ClearysNoteBook
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazzman
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search












Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.



Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
7749 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.
Powered by: SoapBlox