0 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      

Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Op-Ed: Menendez Tilts Toward Net Neutrality

by: Timothy Karr

Sat Sep 09, 2006 at 09:22:55 AM EDT



Congress is now back in session and the Senate has yet to schedule a vote on major reforms to telecommunications law.

The pending legislation does not include any meaningful provision to protect the principle of Network Neutrality online even though more than a million people have signed a petition sponsored by the SavetheInternet.com coalition asking Congress to preserve Internet freedom.

The grassroots movement for Net Neutrality drove home that point the week before Congress reconvened by holding petition drops at senators' offices in 26 cities around the country.

Net Neutrality advocates worry that Internet providers will fast-track content from favored Web sites or companies, while slowing down transmissions from everybody else. To stop companies like AT&T, Verizon, Time Warner and Comcast from abusing our online freedoms, we need to restore the federal law that ensures that we are free to navigate the Web to the sites and service of our choice, and not be pushed to companies favored by these Internet giants.

In Newark, New Jersey activists delivered tens of thousands of petitions to the Senate offices of Robert Menendez calling on the senator to "preserve a free and open Internet by stopping the phone company plan to erect new tollbooths and discriminate against content on the Web." 

August's nationwide petition delivery convinced at least four senators to go on record in support of net Neutrality, bringing the number of senators in favor of Internet freedom up to 26 as of September 7. Fourteen senators are on the record as backing major phone and cable companies' plans to create a tiered and discriminatory Internet. The rest are either waffling or undeclared on the issue.

These numbers are important, especially for New Jersey.

Timothy Karr :: Op-Ed: Menendez Tilts Toward Net Neutrality
The Senate has become deadlocked on Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) telecommunications bill (HR5252) as members are in a quandary over the political impact of a vote against powerful phone and cable interests -- that over the last year have spent more than $100 million on campaign contributions, print, radio and television advertising and lobbyists in their bid to gut Net Neutrality.

Pre-election jitters have stalled this issue even further with incumbents not wanting to turn voters away should they be portrayed in the media as foes of Internet freedom.

Making matters more complex is Sen. Ron Wyden's (D-Oregon) move to put a hold on Stevens bill -- a maneuver that effectively requires 60 Senate votes to lift.

It now stands to reason that Senate leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) isn't going to let the legislation go to the floor unless he's confident that he has the votes in the bag.

The magic number for Net Neutrality supporters is 41 -- enough supporting senators to discourage Senator Frist, and put Stevens' bill on layaway until better language is added to ensure Internet freedom.

Senator Menendez remains in the "waffling" camp although he recently hinted at support for Net Neutrality during an on August 15 campaign stop. But hinting isn't good enough to stop phone companies from ramming Stevens' bad legislation to the floor.

Still, Menendez, in a letter to SavetheInternet.com activists, indicates that he's hedging bets.  "The Internet is a vehicle of information and opportunity not only in the United States but around the globe," the senator wrote on August 30. "I appreciate and share your dedication to maintaining unfettered access to the Internet."

This noncommittal commitment is typical of senators who are holding back a public decision on Stevens' telecommunications bill. The political power of the largest phone and cable companies – expressed in the form of campaign contributions to incumbents – have compelled many who are up for re-election this season to stay on the fence.

But this issue is far too important for political gamesmanship.

Net neutrality is not cumbersome government interference into the dynamic and democratic world of the Internet. It is sound public policy that protects all users from Internet companies that seek to exploit their control of connections for financial gain. For this reason, every major consumer advocacy and public interest group – from the Consumers Union to the New Jersey Public Interest Research Group, from Common Cause to Free Press – supports meaningful Net Neutrality legislation.

This is bolstered by the more than a million Americans who have taken action to contact Congress in support of Internet freedom.

It's time Congress got ahead of the public and protected Net Neutrality before phone and cable companies take over.

Senator Menendez would do well to stand with New Jersey and fully announce his support for Net Neutrality.

-- Timothy Karr is the campaign director of Free Press, the media reform and public policy organization. He also manages the SavetheInternet.com coalition, a grassroots alliance of more than 750 organizations, businesses and bloggers that have banded together to protect Internet freedom. Karr lives in Hoboken.

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Being Against Net Neutrality is Either a Sign of Ignorance Or of Legalized Corruption (0.00 / 0)
Ted Stevens has to be one of the most corrupt (morally if not legally) members of the Senate.  See http://www.washingto...

Clearly Menendez has the intelligence to understand that the facts and the arguments for net neutrality are substantially irrefutable in any fair debate; and he certainly has been given ample access to those facts and arguments...so he can not claim ignorance.

Obviously the telco industry wants to buy policies/laws that give it a monopolistic lock on future power/profits. It gives lots of money to politicians.  But that alone is no good reason to support them.  On the contrary, just because they pay; our guy doesn't have to play.

When we take the whole picture into account, in the truly loooooong run; keeping a free internet may be critical to the survival of human life on Earth.  This isn't the space to make that case at length; but I don't think it's any kind of stretch to make the assertion.

Ideally, we shouldn't really have to, but let's please keep the pressure on Senator Menendez to do the right thing and become a proud ACTIVIST for net neutrality!

I am confisent that our support, as net-roots progressives, would redouble if Menendez came out for net neutrality before the election.

I don't have much money these days; but I'll make this righteous "pay to play" pledge in public:

Senator Menendez, if you come out in favor of net neutrality within the next 30 days, I promise to spend at least 30 hours working for your campaign in October/November.

Perhaps if enough of us take this kind of pledge, the value of our time and effort will exceed the dollar value of telco contributions?

(Putting all else aside, net neutrality is a great populist issue and the more most folk know, and understand, about it the less they want the telcos in full authority over the means of global web communications.  Any pol worth his/her salt should see that it's a winner on EVERY level!)


If Menendez doesn't come around.... (0.00 / 0)
...he won't get my vote.  Period.  End of discussion.  I will NOT be a good soldier any more for Democrats who sell us down the river.  If he's too much of a moron to see how important this is, or if he's too much in the pocket of Big Telecom, then I don't give a rat's butt where he is on anything else.  At that point, we might as well let the Republicans rule.  At least they TELL us they're going to screw us over.  Sellout Democrats tell us they really love us and they're on our side, THEN they screw us over.

WTF (0.00 / 0)
As I've said before|: What the fuck? I'm reaching the point of no return. Help keep me from jumping off a cliff. Are we keepin NJ blue or what?

Featured Stories

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 Deciminyan
 Hopeful
 Jay Lassiter
 Jeff Gardner
 Jersey Jazzman
 KendalJames
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 the_promised_land
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Baristanet
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Daily Newarker
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Garden State Grapevine
» ClearysNoteBook
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazzman
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search












Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.



Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
7754 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.
Powered by: SoapBlox