5 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      

Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Op-Ed: Young, Female, and Running for Office

by: Dana Wefer

Sat Aug 12, 2006 at 10:12:36 AM EDT



(Dana is a fantastic woman and candidate for office deserving of your support! - promoted by njdem)

I am a 24 year old woman making my second run for Morris County Freeholder.  I am fortunate to have this opportunity; my county chair took a real chance and threw the party support behind me.  I’m grateful he did because running for office has been an honor. 

  In the last two years I have attended countless street fairs, candidate forums, and fundraisers; I have knocked on thousands of doors.  No matter what the setting, however, at almost every event I heard at least one variation on “It’s so good to see a young person running for office” and “It’s so nice to see that women are involved.” 

  Politics and government have traditionally been a stomping ground solely for the seasoned white male.  Slowly, our government is becoming more inclusive of women and young people as well as racial, ethnic and religious minorities, but there are still steps that can be taken to speed along the process.

  Dana Wefer :: Op-Ed: Young, Female, and Running for Office

It is easy to criticize the status quo, but changing it is a different story.  The first question that must be asked is why New Jersey, especially as an overall progressive state, has such a poor record of putting women in office.  There are, of course, the usual factors that apply across the board: women have more difficulty raising money, women may be discouraged from running for office or encouraged to run for offices regarded as embodying female attributes, and some studies show that women are at a 10% disadvantage just because of their gender.  These factors apply equally in Kansas and New Jersey though, so why does New Jersey do so much worse than Kansas when it comes to electing women to office?

  One reason is New Jersey’s party boss system.  This system is exacerbated by two primary factors: control over money and control over the party line.  The latter is easily remedied; the former presents a greater challenge.

  The state legislature could mandate open primaries, which would decentralize the power that so called “party bosses” have.  This would mean that anyone interested in running in a primary may take out a petition, collect the requisite number of signatures and file to run, all without even consulting the county party.  Should more people file than there are seats available, the county clerk randomly draws names to decide what order the candidates will appear on the ballot.  Open primaries are highly competitive.  In a closed primary, by contrast, the county chair and his/her (usually his) executive committee determine which candidate they want to run on the party line.  This type of system readily lends itself to the exclusion of women, racial and ethnic minorities and young people, even if unintentional.  Mandating open primaries would put the choice of a general election candidate into the hands of the voters rather than the county chair.

  Due consideration should be given to the fact that closed primaries may benefit women.  In both contested primaries in which I ran, I was successful because I had the party line.  By contrast, the Republicans in Morris County had an open primary with 9 candidates, 2 of which were women.  Neither woman won, rendering me the sole female in a field of six candidates for the primary election.  Women can be excluded by either system, but when in doubt, it’s better to empower voters.

  Money is more difficult.  A county chair and his committee get to allocate money to races and candidates of their choosing.  This could mean streamlining money towards their favored candidates and possibly away from women and minorities, even if unintentional.  This is a stickier problem simply because somebody has to allocate the money and who better to do that than the county chair? 

  In the case of engaging young people, the exclusion is less insidious.  Aside from the same difficulties of fundraising (it’s difficult to compete with an opponent in fundraising when they have held elected office longer than you have been alive) and garnering county support, young people are explicitly excluded from holding many offices because of their age.

  Currently, you must be 21 to run for Assembly and 30 to run for Senate.  This is in the state Constitution.  Those ages should be lowered and the decision of whether to put a young person in office should be left to the voters.  Actions that the state legislature take have huge ramifications for young people.  How much funding higher education receives is a poignant example of how legislative decisions can have a lasting impact on a young person’s life.  Lack of health insurance is another issue that weighs more heavily on this demographic.  Because of the huge impact that the state legislature has on the lives of young adults, young adults should be able to serve in the legislative chambers.  It should be up to the voters whether or not they want to elect a young person. 

  On both fronts and in regard to other demographics, there are huge steps that individuals can take to ensure a truly representative democracy.

  1.  Run for office!  Or, if you prefer, support a woman or young person that is running for office.  If you want to support a female or young candidate, but do not know any, reach out to Democrats2000, an organization dedicated to supporting young candidates. 

  2. Run for a county committee seat. 50% of all seats on the county committee are reserved for women.  Many of these seats go unfilled.  Committee people control who gets elected to the county party executive committee and thus hold tremendous say over who gets support in closed primaries and who gets party money.  If a county chair does not support diverse candidates, the county committee representative can vote him/her out.  It is an undeniably powerful position to hold.

  3.  Put political pressure on your legislators and county to have an open primary.  It would be difficult for the  legislature to take the initiative considering their own seats may often depend on getting their county chair’s support and the county chair may not take kindly to their candidate trying to dilute their power. Still, the county chair may take the initiative on his own. 

  New Jersey is a very progressive state, but we have absolutely failed to ensure that our government, state and local, are representative of the population.  We can take some simple steps as individuals and as a community to achieve greater diversity and representation. 

Dana Wefer is running for Freeholder in Morris County.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
i would support women taking over the world.... (0.00 / 0)
...and frankly i am disguested with the lack of gender or racial diversity in government.  Take the senate for example, one black person in 100 (Obama) and he's 1/2 white.

As for female reresentation in NJ, well this is indefensible.  Additionally, i find it curious about all the age requirements.  So long as we have historical, cultural and structual elements which perpetuate the status quo it will remain difficult to crack the inner sanctum of elected politics.

I wonder how George Norcross feels about women in politics down here in Camden Co.  The mind reels.

activist for hire.Follow jay_lass on Twitter


Maybe I'm at the wrong site (0.00 / 0)
Democrats2000.com appears to be a year out of date. They've got a handy 2005 Recommended list up... :/

They just haven't announced the 2006 recommended list yet n/t (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Excellent Op-Ed! (0.00 / 0)
Go, Dana!  I hope you win your freeholder race.

An aside on the ranking of states and your comment about NJ being behind Kansas, there is a study by the Institute for Women's Policy Research in DC, that ranks NJ
48th out of the 50 states
after weighting higher offices:  governor, US Senate & House, not only comparing percent of women in state legislature. (That puts us ahead of only Mississippi and S. Carolina.) 

The late 2005/early 2006 ranking of NJ as 31st based only on state legislature is thought of as a general ranking of women in elected office.  You don't have to come up with a weighting system to compare states by state leg alone.  States like NJ are hard to compare since we only have one statewide elected office, governor (not counting the Senators, which are of course easy to compare since every state has two). 

I personally care at least as much, if not more, about whether women are being elected to statewide and federal office. The IWPR number, when their new study comes out later this year, is not going to change much from 48th, since we have made no progress in offices higher than state leg.

 


Eagleton Institute in New Brunswick NJ (0.00 / 0)
The Eagleton Institute in New Brunswick, NJ has a great organization they run called the "Center for Women in American Politics"  They encourage women to run for office and also have a great speaker series about women in politics.  They've featured speakers such as Eleanor Holmes Norton, delegate from DC, Maggie Moran, who ran Lautenberg's campaign at age 24, and former Governor Whitman.  Young Women across the state should be encouraged to get involved with their events and speaker series.

In terms of younger people in politics, as Dana said, Democrats2000 does a great job of getting young people involved.  They are doing a bowling event in East Brunswick with Senator Menendez in Mid September as well.

I agree that we need to make all efforts to get more women, minorities, younger people involved in politics in the state of New Jersey.  In the long run, its very beneficial to progressives and Democrats as well.

Chip


Yes, CAWP puts together the states ranking based on state legislatures (0.00 / 0)
Dana referred to CAWP's numbers.  They do a once a year one day 'Ready to Run' training in March, along with a second day (or half day) for latinas.  Also in the Eagleton or CAWP speaker series were Donna Brazile and Carol Moseley Braun, but as a non-partisan research institution, they can only go so far in helping us with the problems on the ground.  I think they're doing a great job within the bounds of their status as a research center and are a fantastic resource.

[ Parent ]
The future is now (0.00 / 0)
Right on Dana - thanks for leading the way for young people, women, and all those who feel shut out of government. Morris County will be lucky to have you as a freeholder!

You'll Win This Time Dana! (0.00 / 0)
If the folks in Morris County have any sense at all.

You're so right on all your points.

We need public campaign finance.  As it is now, we have a system of legalized bribery and de facto corruption.

It's no wonder that governments don't work efficiently when serving the people is secondary to servicing the "real" con$tituency of "contributor$".

Having said that, we have to deal with what is real at the moment and support reformers like you (of whatever age) with time and money.

Please keep those ideals when you run into the "realities" of governance.  A soul is a precious thing to lose.


[ Parent ]
Featured Stories

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 Deciminyan
 Hopeful
 Jay Lassiter
 Jeff Gardner
 Jersey Jazzman
 KendalJames
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 the_promised_land
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Baristanet
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Daily Newarker
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Garden State Grapevine
» ClearysNoteBook
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazzman
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search












Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.



Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
7752 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.
Powered by: SoapBlox