1 user logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      

Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Sign or Veto! Don't Pass the Buck!

by: Bertin Lefkovic

Wed Jan 25, 2012 at 12:24:10 PM EST



promoted by Rosi

In our constitutional republic/representative democracy, the voters in our state elect a Governor and legislators to make hard decisions, not come up with excuses about why they cannot or gimmicks like passing the buck back to the voters.  New Jersey does not need to amend its constitution to provide gay men and women with equal rights under the law.  Our State Supreme Court has already ruled on this issue and ordered our legislature to do just that, which it has done insufficiently to date.

The legislation before the Assembly and Senate that will go to the Governor for his signature or veto addresses earlier failures.  Governor Chris Christie has spent his first two years in office priding himself on his boldness and the courage of his convictions.  Signing
or vetoing this legislation or would be consistent with that assessment of his performance.  Passing the buck back to the voters is not.

If Governor Christie signs the legislation, then this issue will be resolved once and for all.  If he vetoes it, we will do everything in our power to try to override his veto.  If we fail to do this, then we will ask the State Supreme Court, which may include Governor Christie's recent appointees, to determine once and for all whether or not existing legislation satisfies its earlier ruling.

We have three branches of government who are tasked with the responsibility of making hard decisions like this one, not come up with excuses why they cannot or gimmicks like passing the buck back to the voters.  If Governor Christie, our state legislators, and our State Supreme Court justices, including the Governor's appointees, are not afraid to make hard decisions, then there can only be one reason why Christie and the Republicans in Trenton are proposing to pass the buck back to the voters.

Bertin Lefkovic :: Sign or Veto! Don't Pass the Buck!
Like Republicans in so many other states, they want to use this issue to excite their base and drive turnout for this November's elections, possibly to the benefit of Mitt Romney, the Republican Presidential candidate whose state of Massachusetts to his credit was the first in the United States to achieve marriage equality while he was its Governor, one of many things that he has tried to run away from while running for President over the last year.

Considering the overheated rhetoric and hyperpartisanship that has made our federal government all but inoperative, neither Democrats, Republicans, nor independents in our state need a referendum on marriage equality to be inspired to vote in this year's elections.  Regardless of who the Republican Presidential nominee might be, there will be clear contrasts between him and President Barack Obama and between all of the Democrats, Republicans, and independents who will be running for elected office on this year's ballot.

That said, it is entirely possible that Governor Christie has lost confidence in Governor Romney after his recent loss in South Carolina, lagging position in the Florida polls, and sagging national poll numbers.  It is understandable that Governor Christie might be
concerned about how our state's and our country's most conservative voters might feel about his endorsed candidate, for whom he has spent more time campaigning recently than working to solve our state's economic problems, if he is able to survive his current electoral crisis and becomes the Republican Party's standard-bearer.

It is understandable that he might want to give him the chance to come to New Jersey and personally campaign against marriage equality since this issue is one of the many reasons that our state's and our country's most conservative voters don't trust him and may not be willing to come out and vote for him even against someone who they hate as much as President Obama.  Politics and political game-playing is the usual answer to any question about why our state's elected officials do not make hard decisions and instead make excuses or use gimmicks to avoid solving our state's problems and it is the reason why Governor Christie and the Republicans in Trenton do not want to make this hard decision.

We must demand more from our Governor and our state legislators.  We must demand that they make the hard decisions that our voters elected them to make and stop playing political games with important civil rights issues.  We must demand that they vote for or against the legislation that is going through the Assembly and the Senate and we must demand that our Governor sign it or veto it.  We may or may not agree with how they vote or what he does, but we must demand that they be bold and courageous enough to take a stand one way or another and not pass the buck back to the voters.

The buck stopped with President Truman and it must stop with Governor Christie.

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Sweeney said NO ,so it is NO (4.00 / 1)
Excellent Post.

My viewpoint is the short version.

We do not vote on civil rights!

Christie is just plain wrong and his idea of a referendum received a " stake in the Heart" from the Senate President.

The gutless GOP Legislators continue to amaze me. Some of them must have taken all the mirrors out of their homes. Have they no shame???    


It's pretty amusing... (0.00 / 0)
that Sweeney was quoted as saying the referendum was an 'abdication of duty'.... all while knowing he 'abstained' last time.

If 'abstaining' isn't a bigger abdication of duty than calling for a referendum, I don't know what is...

FYI, I'm for it, I think the governor should sign it. It's just the level of current hypocrisy I find amusing...



"Where ever you go, there you are." - Buckaroo Bonzai


[ Parent ]
I hope... (0.00 / 0)
...that Sweeney's opposition to a referendum is emboldened by his recognition that his original action exhibited a dismal lack of courage and leadership.  In fact, I think that it would be an excellent talking point for him to remind people about his earlier abstention on the issue, how embarrassed he now is about that decision, and how its memory fuels his commitment and dedication to this issue at this time.

On the surface, it would appear hypocritical, but if prefaced properly, I think that it makes an even more powerful statement.  It is also important to note that despite the burly, ironworker's exterior, Sweeney has never made his boldness or his courage his calling card to the degree that Christie has, so for Christie to run away from a fight the way that he has on this issue is still far more inconsistent with his facade, although completely consistent with how a bully behaves when stood up to.


[ Parent ]
I still kinda believe... (0.00 / 0)
that Christie doesn't really care either way about this one... it's only a national 'conservative' image that he's protecting by vetoing it...

I posted this WAY back (I'll have to find it), but I could see him vetoing it for the cameras and then whispering to his caucus to override it...

"Where ever you go, there you are." - Buckaroo Bonzai


[ Parent ]
you might be right (0.00 / 0)
I am sure that he would prefer to have his veto overriden than have his two Supreme Court nominees rule in favor of marriage equality, because if he wins re-election in 2013 and runs for President in 2016, the refrain that he will hear is that one of the most important responsibilities that the President has is to fill vacancies on the Supreme Court and no conservative will trust his judgment in this area again if his nominees rule for marriage equality.

[ Parent ]
Someone needs to ask Christie... (4.00 / 1)
...if he has such faith in the people of New Jersey, would he mind putting a question on the ballot regarding whether or not the "millionaire tax" should be reinstated in order to help balance our budget.  

Featured Stories

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 Deciminyan
 Hopeful
 Jeff Gardner
 Jersey Jazzman
 KendalJames
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 the_promised_land
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Baristanet
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Channel Surfing
» Deciminyan
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Garden State Grapevine
» ClearysNoteBook
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazzman
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search












Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.



Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
7968 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.
Powered by: SoapBlox