3 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      

Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

All You Have To Do To Be A Taxpayer Is Buy A Snickers

by: huntsu

Tue Jun 28, 2011 at 10:17:00 AM EDT



There was a time when the ultimate source of pride in this country was being an American Citizen.  It was an awesome thing, and we had free mandatory public education so everyone could be better citizens.  We had public meetings and parties so people could be better engaged as citizens.  Being an American meant being a CITIZEN in bold italic capital letters.  Nothing superseded it.

But things started changing around 1980 or so with the Reagan Revolution as the concept of citizen was discounted.  This reached its pinnacle during the roll up to the Iraq War as countless American citizens were demonized and attacked as traitors for not supporting a war of choice against a country that had not attacked and could not attack us.

Something had to take the place of being an American Citizen as the ultimate sign of patriotism and righteousness.  Some tried "real Americans" but that just smacked of moronic stupidity.  Others tried, "middle America" but that left out the majority of Americans living on the coast.

What took root was "Taxpayers" which came to symbolize everyone we were trying to serve.  Why do we have to cut the benefits of public workers?  The Taxpayers deserve it!  Why do we need to eliminate medical care for the elderly? The Taxpayers deserve it!  Why do we need to get Obama out of the White House? The Taxpayers deserve it!  Why do we spend $10 million investigating Clinton's use of his privates?  The Taxpayers deserve it!  Why should we deny marriage equality?  The Taxpayers deserve it!

And it goes for both sides of the aisle.  Seemingly rational Democratic legislators start saying we need to protect Social Security because the Taxpayers deserve it!  End the Iraq War why?  The Taxpayers deserve it!  Eliminate bargaining for public sector unions? The Taxpayers deserve it! (Yeah, I'm looking at you Sweeney.  And your well-funded 2013 primary from a union member who understands how important bargaining is.)  

But there is a massive flaw that makes the use of "Taxpayers" even more moronic than "real Americans."  At least "real Americans" implies there are "unreal Americans" out there to fight.

But anyone who buys a tire for a car, a gallon of gasoline, takes a paycheck from an honest employer, rides an airplane, buys a house, buys a book, goes to the movies, or engages in any other of a billion different actions and transactions is an American Taxpayer.

In fact, you don't even have to set foot in the United States to be a taxpayer.  A Saudi Arabian can own 100% of a company operating the United States, meaning they pay taxes here.  A French citizen who never left Paris could export wine, and is now an American Taxpayer.  That Mexican coyote sneaking illegal aliens into the United States and gets a hotel room for the people he pays to treat them like shit is an American Taxpayer.

And you know who else is an American Taxpayer?  The school teacher Chris Christie demonized the other day as screwing over American Taxpayers.  The state union worker who Steve Sweeney just demonized as sucking at the teat of American Taxpayers!  All of these people who the right and "left" have demonized as screwing over the American Taxpayers are American Taxpayers!

But I'll take it one more step, and the saddest thing about what I am about to lay out for you is that it is not taking my argument to the illogical extreme.  It is not reductio ad absurdum.  It is simply a plain hard fact -- something sorely missing in our public and political discourse today -- that the following people were not only American Taxpayers but also New Jersey Taxpayers:

  • Abd al-Aziz al-Umari
  • Ahmed al-Ghamdi  
  • Salim al-Hazmi  
  • Nawaf al-Hazmi  
  • Majid Muqid  
  • Khalid al-Mihdhar  
  • Hani Hanjur  

These seven men at one time or another paid New Jersey and United States sales and income taxes, gasoline taxes, excise taxes, property taxes, and any number or other fees or taxes.

And on September 11th these seven men boarded airplanes and flew them the fuck into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and thanks to some courageous passengers an empty field in Pennsylvania.

So the next time some moronic politician wants to tell you that we are doing something for the taxpayers, don't let them use that rhetoric to shut you down.  Just remind them that everyone is a taxpayer, even those who hate this country, and you don't want to justify political actions in a way that supports the terrorists of 9/11.

We need to go back to talking about American Citizens, about citizenship, about engaging in public life as an American.  These are things that Americans and immigrants can aspire to and desire.  It is hard to be a good citizen.  It takes work to be a citizen.  You have to sacrifice to be a citizen.  You have to give up evenings with your children to be a citizen.  You have to waste vacation days at work to be a citizen.

All you have to do to be a taxpayer is buy a Snickers bar.

huntsu :: All You Have To Do To Be A Taxpayer Is Buy A Snickers
Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Bravo!!! (0.00 / 0)
As the son of two immigrants who became American citizens and taught me to be proud to be an American Citizen, you have hit it right on the nail.  We have lost our way.  There is so much to be said about being a member of your community, giving to our society, and working for the common good.  Bless you!

Just great (0.00 / 0)
Going to be passing this one around.

http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com

That said... (0.00 / 0)
every poll ever taken pointed to the fact that the majority favored the actions of last week.

Isn't that democracy?


"Where ever you go, there you are." - Buckaroo Bonzai


democracy yes (0.00 / 0)
not to bring up the debate about what happened, but I just have to say this:

When a politician does something "popular," they cite various polls and claim they are doing the will of the people.  When a politician does something "unpopular," he or she claims not to make decisions based on polls because it takes a true leader to make a (supposed) good decision even if it's not popular.

What is it? You can't have your cake and eat it too.


[ Parent ]
Perhaps the mob has spoken (0.00 / 0)
And, years ago, what did the majority say about desegregation?  

What does it now say about same sex marriage (is there another term for this?)?

Sometimes polls are only good for measuring the effectiveness of propaganda.    

Besides, this ain't 5th century BC (or BCE for that matter) Athens--but no time for a civics lesson.

What did the brilliant, but irascible, Henrik Ibsen say about the majority?  


[ Parent ]
Umm, no. That's polling. (0.00 / 0)
Democracy would be if they voted on it.

[ Parent ]
Yes... (0.00 / 0)
but my point would be that if the choice were put on the ballot, the result would have been the same.

And I understand, it doesn't necessarily make it right. (segregation, marriage equality, death penalty)

"Where ever you go, there you are." - Buckaroo Bonzai


[ Parent ]
And if the playoffs were today ... (0.00 / 0)
the Yankees would be in it.

But they playoffs are three months from now, and lots of things are going to change even if the Yankees do stay in first place.

My point is that if this were on the ballot there would have been a lot more discussion and argument over it, and as a result public opinion on it would be quite different.  The strategy of the various sides was largely to convince legislators of how to vote -- even the public stuff was to get public opinion to pressure legislators -- and so we got one result.

But if this were on the ballot, there would be quit different strategies and many different players than you had now.  As a result, public opinion would have shifted one way or the other, making an appeal to that current opinion moot.


[ Parent ]
Citizenship (0.00 / 0)
Great diary.  I've been making the same point about citizens.  The social darwinist right-wing has turned people from citizens into mere consumers.  As Margaret Thatcher liked to say, there is no such thing as society, only individuals.  They have pushed a philosophy atomizing the culture at large by convincing people that all they should worry about is themselves, not the society as a whole.  As long they don't have to pay more taxes, they don't care how everyone else is doing.

It's the Randian virtue of selfishness.  And without those not on the right, particularly the Democratic party, don't challenge that philosophy at its roots, it will contain to prevail.


The cost of isolation (0.00 / 0)
I can't help thinking that the last refuge for people who still think of themselves as citizens who are part of a greater whole is in charitable non-profits where we are each asked to think of others and do for others expecting nothing in return but the satisfaction of being part of something bigger than ourselves. In fact, I suspect that many people enthusiastically join such causes (cancer is the cause in my case) precisely because, having been touched by something where they needed others' help, crave the opportunity to give back to others. We have an instinct for compassion and cooperation, after all, regardless of what the rugged individualists might have us believe.

Some of this may because of factors other than political messaging and strategy. In an age when parents are often reluctant to let their kids outside to play with others with no supervision or which we drive home in our cars to go watch TV or go through life communicating with others solely by texting shorts sentences, perhaps we're simply learning to isolate ourselves from others. By so doing, we're losing or at least deadening our social skills. In the process, we're losing the opportunity to interact with people different from ourselves. So much of how we live now (gated communities, suburban subdivisions, relying on cars rather than mass transit, moving from the cities to the suburbs, etc.) seems to promote this.

There might be public policies to reverse this trend and promote a greater public spirit in our culture. But we seem to be doing the opposite.


[ Parent ]
I usually agree with you (0.00 / 0)
but in this instance I have a slightly different opinion.  My theory is that if people simply did vote on their wallets and left their supposed moral compass out of the situation, republicans would never win another election.

Republicans win because they dominate backward, popular social issues.  If the republicans didn't have racism,  guns, and religion in their playbook they would have nothing.  For instance, why would some retired guy living in a trailer park on a fixed income care about increasing taxes on people making over $250k or more?  He wouldn't, but because he interprets his social values to be more aligned with the backward social agenda of the right, he votes that way.  Unfortunately for him, the party that attempts to make his (and everybody's) life more comfortable is left trying to explain complex social issues to people who would rather get simplistic messages on faux news rather than NJN    

"Only a fool would follow a bully"


[ Parent ]
The GOP economic rhetoric is designed to confuse (0.00 / 0)
What I mean by that is that Republicans haven't relied solely on the socially conservative arguments to win. While it's true that that strategy certainly has helped them in the past (eg the Bush '04 victory), the Republicans have also managed to convince many middle class people that the GOP is looking out for their economic interests as well, even when it obviously is not. The most recent example of this sort of Republican rhetoric came yesterday when Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell, pushing back on Democratic efforts to raise revenues (by closing some corporate tax loopholes, for example), said that "the American people didn't elect a Republican majority in the House to raise taxes" (I'm going from memory). Right there is an example of rhetoric designed to leave the impression that Republicans are the defenders of the middle class even though they (and many of their Democratic Party colleagues) are actually defenders of the corporate class.

[ Parent ]
Vote their wallets (0.00 / 0)
I don't disagree.  But it depends on how you frame the vote question.  The Republicans want it to simply be whether you, and individual, think you're going to be paying more taxes or not.  If the question were framed as your taxes as compared to the percentage of taxes to income paid by those at the top and big business, that would be a different vote.

No doubt that Republicans have been successful in the past at using cultural wedge issues.  But since the '08 campaign, and even during it, remember Joe the Plumber", they've been using the "taxpayer" as a "libertarian" wedge issue.


[ Parent ]
Right on (0.00 / 0)
I don't want any other  countries help in paying our bills .You have made one of the best argument s yet as to why we should do away with sales tax and property taxes (regressive).have income taxes pay for everything !excellent post !  

Featured Stories

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 Deciminyan
 Hopeful
 Jeff Gardner
 Jersey Jazzman
 KendalJames
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 the_promised_land
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Baristanet
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Channel Surfing
» Deciminyan
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Garden State Grapevine
» ClearysNoteBook
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazzman
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search












Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.



Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
7965 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.
Powered by: SoapBlox