Fri May 13, 2011 at 10:00:00 AM EDT
|
The New York Times is reporting that the NRC has new concerns after the Japanese nuclear disaster:
the staff of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission acknowledged that the agency's current regulations and disaster plans did not give enough consideration to two factors that had greatly contributed to the continuing Fukushima Daiichi crisis in Japan: simultaneous problems at more than one reactor at the same site and a natural disaster that disrupts roads, electricity and other infrastructure surrounding a plant.
I don't think there's anything to add to that except that it is now obvious that neglecting those factors is not only foolish but dangerous. Fukushima has certainly changed my opinions on the safety of nuclear power. We have three reactors at a single site, and as the NRC made clear in the public meeting I attended, it will issue a new site permit for a 4th reactor without considering the safety of the other three. I hope this policy changes soon. By the way, the NRC also revealed this week that emergency equipment at nearly a third of the nation's reactors had serious problems.
I am happy to note, however, that the Salem reactors got high grades in their regular annual NRC safety review. |
| Hopeful :: One, Two, Three, Four: NRC now concerned about multiple reactors at same site |
|
|
Featured Stories  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|