Elections Matter

by: jeffpickens

Wed Apr 27, 2011 at 08:17:16 AM EDT

They certainly matter to NJ Governor Chris Christie, who took a special interest in the election for State Senate in the 8th Legislative District, in which Olympic Gold Medalist and Willingboro native Carl Lewis had plans to run as a Democrat.

Now, it is hardly breaking news that the Governor is a petty, vindictive bully. By the time Lewis formally announced his candidacy on April 11, calling Christie a "good friend", Christie's plan to derail Lewis' candidacy was well underway, and the fate of the campaign had been all but sealed.

According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, Christie sent one of his young thugs after Lewis, in a series of "increasingly tense phone calls", marked by attempted intimidation and implied threats:

(H)e received the first of increasingly tense phone calls from Frank Luna, a veteran political operative who performs constituent services for the governor.

Luna asked Walker, executive director of the Carl Lewis Foundation, whether Lewis was running for the Eighth District Senate seat. According to Walker, Luna told him: "The governor is concerned."

The two spoke daily the next two days, and on April 9, Walker said, Luna told him "the governor is very upset and disappointed, and Carl would be embarrassing himself by running."

Walker said that in that April 9 conversation, Luna told him, "How can you expect the governor to work hand-in-hand with Carl when Carl is working against him? You can forget about this program."

Christie and Lewis spoke April 10.

Christie knew that, should Lewis decide to declare anyway, the Republicans would challenge Lewis' NJ residency in court, and if the court punted, he could count on Lt Governor / Secretary of State Kim Guadagno to pull a Katherine Harris and rule against Lewis,

We get the government we deserve. For those Democrats who were disappointed with the Corzine campaign and decided to stay home in November 2009, or worse, voted for Christie thinking "how bad can he be?", consider this: It could have been Loretta Weinberg making the decision on Carl Lewis' eligibility to run in NJ.While we cannot know for sure how a Secretary of State Weinberg would have ruled, we can be reasonably sure that, stateswoman that she is, she would have given careful consideration to the facts of the case and ruled as Secretary of State, not as the Governor's sock puppet.

To paraphrase Bill Clinton: if you don't vote, you are, in fact, voting for the person you don't want. Let's not let that happen again.

Get out and vote today if your school district is holding elections today.

Get out and vote in November. We need a Democratic majority in the Legislature to hold this out-of-control Governor in check.

Remember, elections matter.

jeffpickens :: Elections Matter

Tags: NJ State Senate, Loretta Weinberg, Kim Guadagno, Chris Christie, Carl Lewis, (All Tags)

Print Friendly View

Send As Email

Elections Matter | 5 comments

Why... (0.00 / 0)

do you think Loretta would have ruled differently?

What in your mind constitutes residency? If you file taxes in another state, vote in another state, how can any reasonable person conclude you are not a resident there?

Honest, I think it's cruddy that the admin law judge 'punted', and I would have preferred someone else make the decision other than Lt. Gov., but that said, she presented a pretty descent case, didn't she?

"Where ever you go, there you are." - Buckaroo Bonzai

by: William Weber (WjcW) @ Wed Apr 27, 2011 at 12:44:27 PM UTC

WjcW - Go back and read it (0.00 / 0)

I did not say Weinberg would have ruled differently, I said she would have acted as a Secretary of State and not as the Governor's stooge. The case could go either way, as Lewis seems to have straddled NJ and CA over the past five years or so. Do I believe Guadagno made a fair and impartial decision? No, I don't.

Blog: Pick's Place

by: jeffpickens @ Wed Apr 27, 2011 at 13:26:53 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

Then... (0.00 / 0)

your position is... Had Loretta ruled the same as Guadagno it would have been based on the facts of the case, but Guadagno coming to the same conclusion is a decision of a 'stooge'.

Interesting...

"Where ever you go, there you are." - Buckaroo Bonzai

by: William Weber (WjcW) @ Wed Apr 27, 2011 at 13:53:43 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

A foregone conclusion (0.00 / 0)

Do you seriously believe that Guadagno made this decision independently, or that she would have gone against CC's wishes? Get real.

Now, Lewis is suing, and hopefully, a court will decide, as it should be.

Blog: Pick's Place

by: jeffpickens @ Wed Apr 27, 2011 at 15:00:31 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

I believe (0.00 / 0)

there is enough evidence in support of her decision to make the 'stooge' comment an unfair criticism.

"Where ever you go, there you are." - Buckaroo Bonzai

by: William Weber (WjcW) @ Wed Apr 27, 2011 at 15:24:59 PM UTC

[ Parent ]