0 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      

Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Op-Ed: Taxes Kill? Not Necessarily

by: Jon Shure

Sat Jun 24, 2006 at 08:00:00 AM EDT



(bump - promoted by jmelli)

If death and taxes are certain, what about the political death that comes from voting for taxes?

The fear of losing one’s job because of voter backlash runs deep among New Jersey politicians. Just say “1991” and they freak. The battle of the budget this season is colored by legislators acting as though supporting Governor Corzine’s proposed sales tax increase was like jumping into a pit of poisonous snakes.

But, if you look at election results over the 40 years that New Jersey has been imposing broad-based state taxes, the heebie-jeebies are unwarranted. Yes, 1991 was a disastrous year for Democrats who did the right thing and voted for the Florio tax increases that—had they not been repealed—would have left this state in far better shape than it is today. The income tax cuts of 1994-96 alone cost New Jersey over $15 billion in lost revenue.

But 1991 turns out to be closer to the exception to the rule than the rule itself.

New Jersey’s sales tax came to be in 1966, under Gov. Richard J. Hughes, a Democrat. Actually it was the Republicans’ idea. Hughes wanted an income tax, couldn’t get it and settled for what was then a 3% sales tax. In the legislative elections the following year it wasn’t even an issue.

New Jersey finally got an income tax in 1976. People thought that would be the end of Gov. Brendan Byrne, another Democrat. They started to refer to him as OTB, for “one-term Byrne.” But the guy got reelected in a landslide the next year.

In 1981, Tom Kean gets elected Governor, echoing the Republican supply-side mantra that helped Ronald Reagan become president the year before. Kean promised to cut the income and sales taxes. Instead he raised both, with a lot of help from Democratic legislators. Kean was reelected with an ungodly 70% of the vote. The late Alan Karcher, who was Assembly Speaker and did a lot of heavy lifting for the tax hikes, loved to tell about how Kean was begging behind closed doors to get enough Dem votes to pass the tax hikes, only to go before the press and say he’s holding his nose while signing them. Smart.

Then there was the millionaires’ tax of 2004. When we at New Jersey Policy Perspective first called for an upper-bracket tax increase to help balance the state budget and recapture some of the windfall from federal tax mostly for the rich, conventional wisdom said no way. Legislators felt they couldn’t vote for a tax increase and survive. A year and a half later, with groups like ACORN, Citizen Action and the NJEA mobilized in the Fairness Alliance and canvassing like crazy, the equation was reversed. They couldn’t vote against this tax increase and survive.

In last fall’s Assembly elections, not only did no one lose their seat because of voting for the income tax hike, no one even got attacked by an opponent for doing so.

So, here we are, staring down another budget crisis. We’re paying the price for a decade or so of bad decisions that almost always were made because the people we elected—from both parties—thought we couldn’t handle the truth. They forgot how to pay the bills; thought the party could last forever.

There are ways out of this. And they don’t have to involve hurtful spending cuts or meanspirited attacks on state workers’ benefits. We can raise the money this state needs. Take the sales tax, for example, which Corzine wants to raise. NJPP put out a report the other day showing how the tax—which turns 40 on July 1—needs a giant overhaul. It taxes the transactions of a generation ago, but today people spend more on services than goods, and many of those services didn’t exist 40 years ago. And it is riddled with inconsistencies, many of which hurt lower income people. Laundry detergent is taxed but taking clothes to the cleaners isn’t. Renting a car is taxed but hiring a limo and chauffer isn’t—that sort of thing.

Facing those problems would bring in billions of dollars a year in new revenue, and we wouldn’t even have to raise the rate above the current 6%. You could use some of that new money to raise the state income tax threshold, expand the Earned Income Tax Credit and do other things so low-income people would still come out ahead—and the state would be on the road to fiscal health.

All it would take is a little courage. And a better reading of history than what we get from people who think 1991 is the whole story.

Jon Shure is president of the liberal think tank New Jersey Policy Perspective.

Jon Shure :: Op-Ed: Taxes Kill? Not Necessarily
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

let me be the first to comment (4.00 / 1)
Thanks for dispelling the notion that raising a sales tax is political suicide for politicians.  Sure, we hate to pay more taxes, but equally appalling in my view is the budget deficit. 

Isn't a sales tax the fairest option? It's a tax on big screen tv's or tennis balls and the like. and presumably it's a tax where you can choose (based on consumption patterns) how much you pay. 

This piece calls political courage.  I'll say a few hail Mary's and wait and see.  In the meantime next time i am at the statehouse i am gonna go up to legislators and say "1991" to see the spooked look on their faces.

activist for hire.Follow jay_lass on Twitter


Not So Fast... (4.00 / 1)
I'm no scholar; but I am old enough to recall the way Jim Florio was ripped up when he increased some taxes. 

I remember the way right wing hate radio on WABC AM lambasted Florio for weeks, months, and it seems...years.  Bob Grant (a particularly vicious critic) took to calling him "Flim Flam Florio" for four hours a day. 

There is no doubt in my mind that Jim Florio would have enjoyed a second term and that NJ would have been better off if he had been more careful about which taxes he raised and how he communicated/sold/defended the need.

As it was we got a borrow and spend Republican for eight years that put us into a deep hole of debt from which we are still reeling. (I'm sure the folks clipping the tax free coupons on that debt are quite pleased with their returns.)

Frankly, I am glad the legislature is balking at the Corzine proposals; just as I am glad that Jon Corzine is being true to his word and is trying to put NJ on a sound fiscal footing.

From reports I've heard it seems that the legislature may have some foolish intent to try to get away with some small changes and large accounting gimmicks to avoid "rasing taxes"  That just kicks the can down the road.

I looked at the report that Juan posted here a few days ago and I don't like the idea of simplistic "across the board" sales taxes.  I recently spent time with friends in West Virginia and I can tell you it really struck me as out-bleeping-rageous that the people there pay sales tax on FOOD!  If Corzine and the legislature ever pass that here in New Jersey the repercussions will make what was done to Florio look like a pleasant back rub in comparison.

The details need to be worked out by experts; but the broad outline of what is needed is as follows.

1)  Yes increase sales tax to 7% but ONLY on goods and services that can be objectively/politically categorized as luxury items (not across the board).....and if needed, raise it to 8% on the highest tier of luxury items/services  (Especially low mileage high end SUV's like Hummers et al.)  The NJPP report  reccomendations should be gone over line by line by real consumer advocates/progressives who will insure that the principle of fairness is respected.

2) Increase the income tax on higher earning individuals AND corporations.  This might even be accompanied by a tax CUT for the smallest of mom & pop businesses.

3)  Pass draconian legislation(i.e. real sharp teeth/criminal sanctions) totally outlawing the practice of "pay to play". In other words, totally eliminate the legalized bribery that has corrupted (morally if not legally) our state and local governance.  I dare say the cost of government would decrease appreciably if everything it purchased were truly shopped for in the same way we consumers carefully shop for the best deals on our own major purchases and there were no kickbacks or sweetheart deals for anyone.

4)  Look for fat and waste and mismangement to cut...let the citizenry and people who actually WORK for the state make some extra money buy PAYING them for practical implementable suggestions and where savings are actually achieved, reward the source.  A 2% "commission" would be well worth it, eh?

I believe the people of NJ would indeed be willing to tolerate (if not celebrate) tax increases IF they were seen to be fair and smart AND part of a general reform of government.

As it is, there is a horrid cynicism regarding politics and politicians that permeates the public's mindset.  We feel (and with good reason) that the system is ripping us off and that it is protecting the interests of the rich and the powerful over those of ordinary working people. (One would hope that that was something good Democrats could repair.)

Bottom lines:  The kind of across the board sales tax hikes discussed in parts of that report would be a disaster.  The Governor must be more progressive/intelligent in his proposals and the legislature must be more willing/committed to making fundamental changes in the way they themselves "do their business".

Let's set an example for the nation of of how to get this right.  We can do it!
 


Nick... (0.00 / 0)
Seems like Mr. Shure has done a fine job of explaining the sales tax and how it is neither political suicide, nor is it currently fair to the economy we live in today.

I think his proposals for updating the tax to include more things that richer folks use is fair.

So lay off the guy.

If political suicide to you means Bob Grant pissing off the base, I assure you, that isn't enough to kill a candidate.

The right wing talking heads will talk about anything, taxes, abortion, whatever. Don't expect them to cozy up to Corzine just because he fails to raise taxes.

To them we are always the enemy and as such we shouldn't not fix something for fear of retaliation from right wing talk radio hosts.

Media In Trouble


[ Parent ]
Thank You (0.00 / 0)
I appreciate your concern that anything that could be interpreted as the slightest bit critical of anyone "on our side" might be taken by the Republicans as weakness.

You are clearly a good Democrat, and I respect your concerns and even share them.

However, a careful reading of what I wrote will reveal that my comments and suggestions were quite positive, constructive, and (if  do say so myself) well within the spirit of the ideas that drive our party.

In fact I would even go further and add that we need to modify the way we tax property in NJ to take into account the income/assets of the owner.

A just tax system can not be "simple" or "flat"; as a progressive, you know that.

I advise you to read up a bit on Professor Sure.  He is a professional veteran of Journalism, Politics, and Academe.  I can assure you with 100& confidence that he, in no way needs to be defended by you against anyone...let alone someone who is not, and was not, attacking him.

Again, I take your warning to "lay off" in a positive spirit...but I dare say you were being over protective and off base.

Now if you care to discuss the actual substance of the tax questions in re the looming budget deficit, I would be happy to engage you in a courteous thoughtful exchange of ideas and opinion.

BTW  The first few paragraphs of this Salon article address your Florio comments well.  http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/09/11/florio/print.html


[ Parent ]
Thank you Mr. Shure (0.00 / 0)
For your column. In my opinion it-- and the NJPP report- ought to be read by all the folks in Trenton.

As to Nick's Nostradamus predictions about the sales tax consider the following: with the penny-on-the-dollar proposed revenue increase, the $100 worth of groceries you buy will (after taxes) move from costing $106 to $107. Unless of course, you're buying food. Or clothing. Which are exempt. In which case, $100 it is.


Nostradamus Not (0.00 / 0)
The actual ratio would be from $6 to $7 that amounts to a 17% tax increase.  I agree that for many it would be a pittance...but we Democrats are, in principle, concerned with "the least among us".

In any event, I was referring to this line in the report, 

>>>"The only way to rectify the inconsistencies of taxing pumpkins and candy bars is to consider a sales tax on food.  This should be considered only in combination with a credit system to offset the most regressive impact of such an expansion."<<<<<<<<

I have no problem with "inconsistencies" that aren't "foolish".  It is precisely the job of government to make intelligent judgement calls...and to be willing and able to modify things in time as circumstances warrant.  Flat simple taxes are generally problemmatic.

I don't agree with the idea that a Democratic governor and legislature should go any further along the path of imposing regressive taxation on one hand and then coming up with a progressive way to somehow "credit" the poor and working class people (at some future point) upon whom the first tax impacts. 

The problem with that is that many, if not most, poor folk don't have the cash on hand to wait for the end of the year to be somehow compensated...I put it to you that increasing the cost of food would actually result in hardship for people already living at the edge. 

It's extremely unlikely that this will happen...taxing food would likely be political suicide in NJ...but even the idea of such an abomination is abhorrent.  I would have no problem with some kind of targeted tax on super luxury foods like caviar etc...but that's another story.

BTW Here's a nice report from Professor Shure's institute that addresses the question of income tax progressivity in NJ nicely. Well worth a look.

http://www.njpp.org/rpt_zerillo.html


[ Parent ]
What do we do next year? (4.00 / 1)
Regardless of your position on the sales tax this year, my concern is the necessary corrections that our Gov. appears to be making still provide for a billion dollar plus deficit next year.
Are we are going to have this same debate next year about going from 7 to 8 cents? I for one would be more inclined to support the tax if it was coupled with structural changes that will provide for a balanced budget next year without additional 'revenue raisers'.

"Where ever you go, there you are." - Buckaroo Bonzai

Featured Stories

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 Deciminyan
 Hopeful
 Jeff Gardner
 Jersey Jazzman
 KendalJames
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 the_promised_land
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Baristanet
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Channel Surfing
» Deciminyan
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Garden State Grapevine
» ClearysNoteBook
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazzman
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search












Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.



Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
7965 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.
Powered by: SoapBlox