0 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      

Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Fun with Redistricting Redux: Keeping Hawthorne in LD35

by: Bertin Lefkovic

Sat Jan 22, 2011 at 05:07:37 PM EST



The Blue Jersey community was very excited to read this week that our very own, Jeff Gardner, has made his electoral intentions official and opened up a legislative campaign account.  Ever since John Girgenti voted against marriage equality and set in motion a process that was kicked into high gear when Jeff's slate of County Committee candidates defeated Girgenti's last June, enabling Jeff to become Hawthorne's Municipal Chair, I have thought about how redistricting might impact Jeff's chances of running for and winning a State Assembly or State Senate seat in 2011.

There has been a lot of talk about John Girgenti's future with regards to redistricting, primarily because he was a loyalist of Governor/Senator Richard Codey's when the Steve Adubato/George Norcross axis of corruption staged their takeover of the Democratic leadership in Trenton.  As a result, neither Jeff nor Girgenti have any advocates for keeping their otherwise Republican-leaning town of Hawthorne in the very Democratic (thanks to Paterson) 35th LD on the legislative redistricting commission.  I could be wrong, but I think that if there is anything that Jeff and Girgenti agree on, is that it is in their best electoral interest for Hawthorne to stay in LD35.

But without any advocates on the LRC, the only thing that might help them keep Hawthorne in LD35 is a compelling argument that serves the agendas of some of the commission's members.  There are two members of the LRC in particular whose agendas have become quite clear over the last year.

Bertin Lefkovic :: Fun with Redistricting Redux: Keeping Hawthorne in LD35
Senator Kevin O'Toole, who represents the very Republican 40th legislative district has been an enemy of Dick Codey for as long as they have served together in the State Senate and has found an ally in our state's DINO Senate President, Steve Sweeney. Together, they intend to redistrict Codey and his Republican-leaning town of Roseland (and probably some of the other Republican-leaning towns in NW Essex County) out of his very safe LD27 and into O'Toole's LD40 or Joe Pennachio's LD26.

Senator Paul Sarlo was at the center of controversy recently when his Assemblymate, Fred Scalera, resigned his seat to take a lucrative private sector job.  In an effort to curry favor with Bossman Adubato's and Governor Chris Christie's #1 flunkie, Joe DiVincenzo, Sarlo sided with Joe D on the issue of keeping the Assembly seat in Nutley for the remainder of this year even though he has been working feverishly to redistrict both Nutley and Passaic out of the district, creating an all-Bergen LD36, enraging many Bergen County leaders who wanted to see the seat go to someone in Bergen County. Joe D and Sarlo won this battle and Essex County Undersheriff, Kevin Ryan, was given the Assembly seat.

So what does any of this have to do with Hawthorne?

Assuming for a moment that Senator O'Toole is not a complete and total coward, I believe that given his history with Codey, he would like to be the one to personally end his political career.  I also think that by adding the Republican-leaning NW Essex towns to his base in Cedar Grove and Verona, he would be able to better insulate himself against primary challengers from Bergen and Passaic County, where factionalism within the GOP is an ongoing issue.  This will require a significant amount of remolding of LD27, LD28, LD29 and LD34.

Meanwhile, Sarlo is going to have to find a new home for Passaic if he wants to remove it from LD36 along with Nutley, which will most likely be added to Belleville, Bloomfield, East Orange, and the North Ward of Newark to create a safe haven in LD28 for Adubato/Joe D acolytes, Assembly Speaker Sheila Oliver, the aforementioned Assemblyman Ryan, and a handpicked North Ward toadie to be the State Senator.

The problem with Passaic is that it is almost entirely encircled by Clifton, requiring the two cities to be linked and combined with other Passaic County towns like West Paterson, Totowa, Haledon, North Haledon, creating a new LD34.  Separating Clifton, West Paterson, and East Orange from Montclair and Glen Ridge and adding these latter municipalities to West Orange, Livingston, Millburn, and Maplewood would create a new LD27.  Orange and South Orange would be added to the other four wards of Newark, creating a new LD29.  

Once again, what does all of this have to do with Hawthorne and LD35?

Paterson is not big enough to be its own legislative district and it is too big to be combined with both Clifton and Passaic, the latter of which Paul Sarlo would like to remove from LD36 to prevent Assemblyman Gary Schaer from challenging him in either the Democratic primary or the general election.

The only way that Sarlo can do this is to create the aforementioned new and Passaic County-centric LD34, which takes advantage of a narrow corridor between Paterson and Wayne where Haledon and Totowa border each other, connecting the towns north of Paterson with the towns south of Paterson.  However, this leaves one town and one town only (aside from LD38 towns like Elmwood Park and Fair Lawn and we are not going to bother Bob Gordon, who is going to have his share of fights going forward as Sarlo tries to take away his towns to make up for giving up Nutley and Passaic) to connect Paterson with other towns that will make up a full LD.  What is the name of that town?

HAWTHORNE!!!!!

Once Hawthorne and Paterson are connected, the LRC has options at its disposal with regards to filling out the rest of LD35 and which options they choose will probably depend to varying degrees on what O'Toole wants LD40 to look like and whether or not he wants to keep Assemblyman David Russo on his team or ship him off to LD38 for a player to be named later.

Guessing that O'Toole might choose the latter both to give Russo a chance to run for the State Senate in a new LD38 that includes Ridgewood, making it even more purple than it already was, and keep Russo from being able to take him on in the future, I kept Glen Rock in LD35 and added Midland Park and Wyckoff.

So where does that leave Jeff and Girgenti?  More or less the same as now, except that Nellie Pou is no longer a factor.  Her town (Haledon or North Haledon - I forget which one) is now in the new LD34 where she may finally have the organizational support to run for State Senate.  The wildcard, as he was when Passaic was in LD36, is Gary Schaer.  

Obviously, like Pou, he will want to move up to the State Senate, but unlike Pou, he may choose to switch parties and run against Pou as a Republican.  His Orthodox Jewish base will go with him no matter what party he runs with and he can also count on significant alliances in the Hispanic Republican community both in Passaic and in other parts of the district.  There are also Democrats in Clifton and West Paterson who may have a claim to the State Senate seat or one of the two State Assembly seats in the district.

Now that Pou is no longer a factor in LD35, what remains to be seen is where the support of the Passaic County and Paterson powerbrokers lie.  Obviously, Bill Pascrell Jr. is going to want to see his good friend John Girgenti get organizational support for his re-election.  Recently elected Mayor Jeffrey Jones may have someone in his circle who he would want in that seat.  County Chairman John Currie probably has an opinion as well.  Both the incumbent Assemblyperson from Paterson, Elease Evans, and former Mayor Joey Torres probably has some interest in the seat, but I have no idea whose backing they have or would need to get.

If I had to guess, I would guess that Currie and Jones are going to be on the same page and will be supporting someone from Paterson, not Girgenti, giving that person organizational support.  If that person is not Elease Evans, she will most likely run with that person for one of the two Assembly seats.  

If Girgenti chooses to run for re-election off the party line, he will probably recruit his former staffer, Paterson Councilman Andre Sayegh, to run for State Assembly with him. The remaining Assembly vacancies on these slates make for an extremely interesting game of political chess that will determine one way or another whether our good friend, Jeff, will be running for State Senate or State Assembly this year.

In an attempt to bring a former adversary into his fold and unify Paterson's African-American and Hispanic-American communities, I predict that Jones (and Currie) will offer organizational support for the State Senate seat to Torres, which I predict that Torres would accept.  However, if I am wrong, and Jones offers it to someone closer to him and offers Torres the other Assembly seat on his candidate's line, Torres will have a very interesting choice.  He could accept the offer from Jones, accept a similar offer from Girgenti and Sayegh to run with them, or he could build a third slate with himself as the State Senate candidate.

What Torres decides will probably determine to some degree the choices and decisions that Jeff will have to make.  If Torres agrees to run with Jones' person and Elease Evans, Jeff will have no choice but to try to create his own slate of candidates, most likely with himself as the State Senate candidate.  However, I think that it is more likely that Torres would choose to run his own slate or to run with Girgenti than take a secondary slot on a Jones slate, leaving Jeff the choice of running for State Assembly on the Jones slate or the Torres slate if there is one.  Either of these options is probably a safer route to Trenton for Jeff than running as an insurgent for State Senate in a three-way race against Girgenti and an organization-backed, Paterson-based candidate with two insurgent Assembly candidates.

There is also the possibility that Jones and Currie could join with Pascrell, Jr. in support of an organizational slate consisting of Girgenti, Evans, and Sayegh, which would all but guarantee an insurgent State Senate run by Torres and an Assembly opening for Jeff. Obviously, I would prefer to see Jeff in a slate with organizational support, but in lieu of that, running for Assembly on an insurgent slate with a former Mayor of Paterson is probably not a bad place to be.

But before any of these contingencies can even be considered, Hawthorne has to remain in LD35 with Paterson.  The alternatives, the simplest and most likely being that Hawthorne gets moved into LD40, create a much more difficult path to Trenton for Jeff.  If Hawthorne is placed into LD40, Jeff will most likely have the opportunity to run for State Senate whenever he wants it, but the odds of him or any Democrat winning in that district would be extremely remote.

Another possibility is that Hawthorne gets moved into LD38, setting up a contested primary between Girgenti and Gordon.  However, the only way that Jeff would have the chance to run for Assembly with Gordon is if Fort Lee (Joan Voss) or Paramus (Connie Wagner) are removed from the district.  He could run his own slate of candidates, but against Girgenti and Gordon, the latter of the two being a pretty good progressive during his time in Trenton, that would be an extremely tough road to hoe for Jeff.

So if we agree that Hawthorne remaining in LD35 with Paterson is an essential component of Jeff Gardner having the best chance of being elected to either the Assembly or the Senate, the next step is to do something about it.  What can we do? We can share this diary (or write your own) with as many people as possible, making it clear to the powers that be in both the Democratic and Republican Parties that we recognize the fact that they are going to play their inside baseball games and do what is best for their agendas and interests, but that if there is one thing that they can do that would please the progressive community as a whole, it would be to leave Hawthorne in LD35 with Paterson.  I don't think that this is a lot to ask.  Do you?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

So (0.00 / 0)
many scenarios it hurts my head lol

I think there's a good chance Hawthorne remains in the same district as Paterson (more wishful thinking than anything) and if it does then there will be one hell of a primary between Girgenti and Gardner.  


maybe and maybe not (0.00 / 0)
I hope that Hawthorne stays in LD35 with Paterson and that Jeff gets his chance to run for the State Senate against Girgenti, but I also know that Jeff is smart enough to know that there may be other, possibly better ways to take him down and that could involve him running for State Assembly or some other office as part of a slate of opposing candidates with a more established candidate running for State Senate against Girgenti at the top of the slate.  Who knows?

But the most important thing right now is getting the word out that progressives want Hawthorne to stay in LD35 with Paterson.  It isn't a no-brainer and if progressives play their usual wait-and-see game, we should be neither disappointed nor surprised when Hawthorne finds itself in LD40 and a great guy like Jeff has to wait a decade or more to have a real shot at serving in Trenton.

Elections have consequences, but so does our community's ongoing failure to engage critical aspects of the political process like redistricting.


[ Parent ]
What (0.00 / 0)
exactly can be done in order to spread out the word that Hawthorne should remain in the 35th? Redistricting is an insiders game with only 10 people being giving a voice and 1 person deciding between the two.

And the way I see Jeff winning against Girgenti is by getting out the progressive suburban vote in the district while keeping conservative and urban turnout down.  


[ Parent ]
How... (0.00 / 0)
...do you propose to keep conservative and urban turnout down?  Hire Ed Rollins to bribe the local clergy?

I am not saying that Jeff couldn't beat Girgenti in a head-to-head.  All I am saying is that there are a lot of moving parts and that when they have all clicked into place, it is possible that there will be opposition to Girgenti and that Jeff could still play a major role in taking him down even if his name is not directly opposite his on the ballot.

If you had to choose between Jeff running for State Senate on an insurgent slate against a PCDO-backed Girgenti slate or Jeff running for State Assembly on a PCDO-backed slate against a Girgenti slate that is running off the line, which would you choose?  The former is clearly the more exciting and fun option, but the latter is the one more likely to succeed, which should count for something.  Right?

As far as getting the word out goes, there are lots of progressives who visit Blue Jersey who have friends who are progressives and are members of progressive organizations who can pass this along to their friends and so on and so forth.  There is a thing called Facebook that people far more netroots savvy than myself utilize to make things go viral all of the time.

To the best of my knowledge, there is not another progressive legislative candidate poised to challenge one of the 9 Democrats who abstained or voted against marriage equality at the moment so it is not like there is a lot of activity on the progressive frontier at the moment. It is also not like we are asking the powers that be to draw the ideal legislative district map so that we will elect a progressive Democratic majority in 2011, overthrowing all of the corrupt S.O.B.s on both sides of the aisle.

This is a very simple and straightforward idea that progressives could and should be able to rally around and it even offers benefits for the powers that be and their agenda.  It also has a very short shelf-life. These decisions are going to be made in the coming weeks/months, so it is not like it could or should consume a significant amount of time or other resources.

The most important thing is to not cede "insiders games" to the insiders.  If nothing else, it is important to let them know that we are paying attention and if the Democratic leadership in particular want progressives to be engaged, there is something that they can do right now that will either make us very happy or very angry.

Our choice is to take our usual "wait and see" approach about these kinds of inside baseball games and then bitch and moan about them after the fact when things don't go our way or we can make it clear how we feel about them right now and with large numbers so that there can be no doubt about what our position was and how we'll respond if we're denied.

I think that the choice is an easy one, but right now, I am the only person talking about this.  It remains to be seen if others decide to start talking about this as well.


[ Parent ]
It (0.00 / 0)
will be a primary for as low turnout off year election, turnout in urban Paterson will be as low as it can get (next to a BOE election). The highest turnout in the district will take place in the suburbans areas of the district where liberal Dems will be more likely to support a pro-equality candidate running against a well-connected incumbent.

I would rather prefer Gardner running against Girgenti without any slate of his own. Jeff's main reason for running is the Senator's vote on marriage equality and since both Pou and Evans voted for equal rights then there would be no reason to run candidates against them.

Gardner is going to have to rely on support among the yuppies in the district, outsider support (garden State Equality and DFA come to mind), and a clean cut grassroots campaign in order to win.  


[ Parent ]
It... (0.00 / 0)
...is very hard to win a contested primary as an insurgent.  It is even harder to do it by yourself.

The Assembly never had a marriage equality vote, but I will take your word for it that both Evans and Pou would have voted for marriage equality if they had the chance.

That said, if there is a contested primary, anyone who runs on Girgenti's line is endorsing his no vote on marriage equality and deserves to have candidates run against them.


[ Parent ]
sorry (0.00 / 0)
I misremembered the Assembly civil unions vote for a marriage vote.

By running a complete slate against Girgenti/Pou/Evans you would not only lose the  votes of Girgenti loyalists but also that of Evans' and Pous'. The best way for Gardner to win, in my opinion is to simply run against Girgenti and make it a referendum on Girgenti, not on Girgenti, Evans, and Pou.  


[ Parent ]
Understandable, but... (4.00 / 1)
...short-sighted.  Most voters, particularly urban voters, are line voters and will vote for an entire slate of candidates.  Anyone savvy enough to vote for candidates rather than slates understands why an insurgent needs to build a slate and would not necessarily hold it against Jeff if he did this.

Also, this conversation is based on a scenario where Nellie Pou's town has been redistricted out of LD35.  As far as Assemblywoman Evans is concerned, my guess is that she will run on the PCDO line regardless of who is on the top of it.  It could be Girgenti or it could be Jeff or it could be someone from Paterson (possibly Assemblywoman Evans).

I know that it seems like Jeff's best route is that of a lone wolf, but it is very hard for insurgents to win that way.  It will only be a referendum on Girgentii for pro-marriage equality voters who are angry at him for his no vote.  Other voters will have to be sold on the fact that Jeff and others represent a new and better vision for the district.


[ Parent ]
Featured Stories

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 Deciminyan
 Hopeful
 Jeff Gardner
 Jersey Jazzman
 KendalJames
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 the_promised_land
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Baristanet
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Channel Surfing
» Deciminyan
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Garden State Grapevine
» ClearysNoteBook
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazzman
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search












Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.



Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
7965 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.
Powered by: SoapBlox