0 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      

Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Why are Reps. Rothman & Andrews giving cover to Christie's attempt to weasel out of $271 million?

by: Rosi Efthim

Fri Dec 03, 2010 at 05:55:10 PM EST



Soft statements by two members of the NJ Democratic congressional delegation - Rep. Rob Andrews & Rep. Steve Rothman - have been picked up for use in a press release from Gov. Christie's front office trumpeting Bipartisan Support For Governor Chris Christie's Challenge To Federal Transit Administration. And in fact, the congressmen's presence in the release (2 among a dozen people quoted) is the only reason Christie can claim that bi-partisanship in his release. Yes, their statements were lifted (and attributed) from quotes they gave to newspapers. My question is: Why, if you're Andrews or Rothman, utter such neutralizing statements at all? Where's the outrage? Where's the rectitude? The proper response to Christie's attempt to weasel out of New Jersey paying back the $271 million we owe the federal government now is disgust at NJ trying to cheat the nation's taxpayers, is resentment and conflict of interest questions that he'll do it at $485/hour with politically connected out-of-state firm Patton Boggs that's also repping the Republicans in the coming redistricting, is at least some anger that this governor is making pound-foolish decisions that are costing more money while his team builds him a legacy crafted to make it look like he's saving us money.

Responsibility is an easy thing to recommend to others, but taking responsibility sometimes requires sacrifice and resolve. Personal responsibility is an easy thing to preach; taking personal responsibility for your actions and those you make for the people you govern is harder, and it's something Gov. Christie has not shown an inclination to do. Responsibility is more than smackdowns, legacy-building and dominating a room. It's the harder stuff of grownups.

Gov. Christie pulled the plug on a massive infrastructural project, ARC Tunnel, more than a decade in development, billions invested, an agreement meant to span over the arc of whoever was governor, between New Jersey, New York, the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, and the workers and people of the region.

Fine. It's done.
Governor had his reasons, which I don't agree with at all. But he's governor. He's the decider. But what goes along with a decision of this magnitude is consequences. The governor knew going into this decision what those consequences were, and chief among them was the responsibility to pay back the federal government for resources it laid out on our say-so, on our promise we were committed. We might get out of this - via skillful lawyering, and settlement of a bad debt - but the fact is, if we do it will be good but it won't be right. We owe the nation's taxpayers their outlay back. We owe. Congressmen Andrews and Rothman could have done better talking to the press, they unwittingly allowed the Governor's front office to pull quotes that legitimately give the press the impression key Democrats stand behind Christie, his tunnel bungle, and his efforts to slide away from the consequences.

Entire press release - with Rothman and Andrews quotes prominent placed near the top, of course by Christie's front office - after the jump.

Rosi Efthim :: Why are Reps. Rothman & Andrews giving cover to Christie's attempt to weasel out of $271 million?
U.S. Congressman Frank A. LoBiondo:

"Governor Christie was right to cancel the ARC project due to its excessive cost over-runs and financial burden on the state. Furthermore, he is right today to challenge the Federal Transit Administration's assertion that state taxpayers must repay the FTA for their poor planning and lack of cost controls. I stand with the Governor and New Jersey residents in support of this legal effort," said LoBiondo, a member of the House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee.  (Press Release, 12/2/2010)

U.S. Congressman Leonard Lance:

"I support fully Governor Christie efforts to protect New Jersey and its taxpayers and stand ready to work with our state's congressional delegation in a bipartisan manner to ensure that the Garden State is not being wrongly singled out by federal transportation officials."  (Press Release, 12/2/2010)


U.S. Congressman Steve Rothman:

"I too am interested in knowing the legal basis for the claim New Jersey needs to repay the federal government," Rothman said. "I want to make sure if there is a sound legal basis for it that New Jersey has not been singled out for repayment if in fact, some suggest, other states have been able to cancel projects and not have to pay back the federal government...I'd like to see if there's a way, now that the governor has made his decision to cancel the ARC tunnel project to be able to use the $3 billion ... and even the $3 billion that the Port Authority was going to kick in for the ARC tunnel for transportation projects within New Jersey and also crossing the Hudson River," Rothman said.  (Karen Rouse and Herb Jackson, "Christie expected to hire lawyers to fight fed's demand for $271M in tunnel costs," (The Record, 12/1/2010)

U.S. Congressman Robert Andrews

"New Jersey sends far more (money) to Washington than we take in,'' Andrews said. "Part of our job is to reverse this trend, and part of that would be to get this waiver.'' (Asbury Park Press, 11/30/10)

U.S. Congressman Rodney Frelinghuysen

U.S. Rep. Rodney P. Frelinghuysen, R-Morris, said in a statement he would fight with Christie in ""resisting arbitrary repayment demands'' over the tunnel. (Asbury Park Press, 11/30/10)

U.S. Congressman-elect Jon Runyan:

"New Jersey  taxpayers should not continue to be punished for a project that, from the beginning, required an inequitable share of the funding burden to be assumed by our taxpayers. I stand in full support of Governor Christie's continued efforts to put  the interests of New Jerseyans first on this critical issue. In the spirit of bipartisanship, our delegation must work together to ensure that New Jersey and our citizens are treated fairly in this process."  (Statement by U.S. Congressman-elect Jon Runyan, 12/3/2010)

New Jersey Assembly Republican Leader Alex DeCroce:

"Governor Christie is doing the right thing for the taxpayers of New Jersey by standing up to the federal government that is demanding the return of monies spent on the cancelled ARC tunnel project. By taking on the Washington bureaucrats, the governor is again showing his allegiance to protecting our taxpayers. Governor Corzine and Democrat leaders never should have signed onto a tri-state project that made New Jersey responsible for 70 percent of the costs. Putting New Jersey taxpayers on the hook for billions in cost overruns is irresponsible and not the way to govern. It is exactly that type of behavior that has gotten our state into a fiscal crisis. In such difficult economic times, it defies reason why the Obama administration is trying to recover millions from our state's long-suffering taxpayers when, in the past, New York State abandoned an FTA project without consequence. It is time for New Jersey's federal representatives to work with the governor in opposing this unreasonable FTA demand."  (Press Release, 12/2/2010)

New Jersey Assemblyman Scott T. Rumana:

"New Jersey taxpayers should not be stuck with this unreasonable bill and I applaud the governor for once again protecting their interests. Governor Christie took a proactive stand for taxpayers against an ill-conceived funding scheme when he cancelled the flawed ARC Tunnel project. Now, he is making another stand against the federal government's apparent ransom."  (Press Release, 12/2/2010)

New Jersey Assemblyman Scott Rudder:

"New Jersey taxpayers should not be responsible for the $271 million that was wasted in the haste to construct a tunnel that was clearly motivated only by political, not practical reasons. This whole episode reeks of political theater and I'm glad Governor Christie is not going to let taxpayers pay for the mistakes of the federal government and previous administrations in Trenton. Government is supposed to protect the people. Governor Christie understands that principle; the Obama administration does not."  (Press Release, 12/2/2010)

New Jersey Assemblyman John Amodeo:

"The Christie administration's decision to go forward in its quest to prevent the federal government from recouping monies the state spent on the cancelled ARC Tunnel is another victory for New Jersey taxpayers who would have been saddled with billions in cost overruns had the governor not put a stop to the ill-advised project. Governor Christie has again shown true leadership by not allowing the FTA to take advantage of our state and its taxpayers."  (Press Release, 12/2/2010)

New Jersey Senator Michael Doherty:

"I am deeply disturbed by the FTA's unreasonable, capricious and arbitrary demand that New Jersey taxpayers pay it for a project doomed to fail.  The FTA set in motion a chain of events that inevitably led to the correct decision by Governor Christie to stop throwing good money after bad. What is more disturbing than the FTA's unreasonable demands is the deafening silence from our two U.S. Senators. A bipartisan coalition of New Jersey Congressmen is working in Washington to pressure the FTA to drop its unreasonable claim; yet our two Senators have once again abandoned their obligation to represent the people of this state."  (Press Release, 12/2/2010)

New Jersey Senator Joe Pennacchio:

"This project came with an open ended commitment for cost overruns that our Governor and New Jersey taxpayers refuse to accept.  Even after the U.S. Inspector General criticized the project, the Federal government along with our two U.S. Senators continue to ask for $271 million which would be paid for with money we simply don't have," said Pennacchio...While N.J. Congressmen Andrews and Frelinghuysen fight for our taxpayers on this issue, Menendez and Lautenberg chose instead to politicize this matter by siding with the Federal government," said Pennacchio.  "Lautenberg told the Wall Street Journal, that we 'absolutely owe this money. I would hope at best this may just be a case of inept representation and not a case of Washington punishing a Republican New Jersey Governor while rewarding a Democrat New York Governor.  Minimally, New Jersey's taxpayers deserve an answer from our U.S. Senators," concluded Pennacchio."  (Press Release, 12/3/2010)

 

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

I agree (0.00 / 0)
that Christie's decision is irresponsible, and the money being spent on lawyers is most likely throwing good money after bad. But I don't think the statements offer any partisan cover. I think they reflect a hope that New Jerseyans might not have to pay back the money and further defund our state government in the process.  

Problem is, (0.00 / 0)
it's money we owe. Legitimately owe.

Sure, it's nice to hope New Jersey doesn't have to pay what it owes to pay back the federal taxpayers. I hope everybody in New Jersey gets a pony!

The problem is, people like Christie preach responsibility like it's a value only they, and fellow Republicans, understand. But if we don't pay this money back, it's not like the debt just vanishes. Somebody has to make up for that debt, and it will likely be the American taxpayers. Hope for it all you want, but it's wrong. And if Christie was watching another governor of another party trying to slide out of that much obligation he would never shut up, I assure you.

We all want out of debt. But this is unethical.  

It's not a particularly snappy signature, but here's what I think we need in the next NJ Democratic State Chair.  


[ Parent ]
Is this another "no-bid" contract? (0.00 / 0)
Assuming Christie is wrong about the tunnel, the fact remains he, and the rest of the NJ congressional delegation as well, have an ethical responsibility to their constituents to get the best possible deal they can.  If there is a loophole in the contract, or some other relevant clause, that would enable NJ to reclaim all, or at least part, of the money then it would be a dereliction of their official duties not to pursue this.  It is not up to us to decide whether NJ owes the money or not, that would be up to the courts and judges to decide if NJ has a valid case.  

I think the real story here is Patton Boggs.  How much do they donate to Democrats versus how much do they donate to Republicans.  If I was an investigative reporter, I would definitely be looking into how much the firm has given to Republicans.  We know that Chris tie has a history of rewarding no-bid contracts to politoically connected law firms, and there should be plenty of political ammo for Democrats to take advantage of if this is another one of those instances.

http://christiegonewild.blogsp...


We owe the Federal Gov't ? (0.00 / 1)
 New Jersey gets back the lowest return on our dollars sent to Washington  (.61)Democrat Frank Lautenberg has done nothing to help bringing back enough money during his 24 years in Washington ,I think he owes  New Jersey Taxpayers a n apology . Or do you believe it's OK to sent all our hard earned taxpayers dollars to DC ? ...271 million is just a downpayment on what DC owes US !  

Featured Stories

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 Deciminyan
 Hopeful
 Jeff Gardner
 Jersey Jazzman
 KendalJames
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 the_promised_land
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Baristanet
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Channel Surfing
» Deciminyan
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Garden State Grapevine
» ClearysNoteBook
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazzman
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search












Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.



Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
7965 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.
Powered by: SoapBlox