3 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      

Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Family Planning, the 2% Cap, Privatiztion - Another Hot Week In New Jersey

by: Senator Loretta Weinberg

Mon Jul 12, 2010 at 09:04:00 AM EDT



Family Planning $s: We're still waiting (and the women of New Jersey are waiting) for the Governor's signature (or veto) on the revenue neutral bill to restore $7.5 million to family planning centers who provide health care to 135,000 uninsured or underinsured families. Funny how Mr Christie came right out of his office when Senator Sweeney delivered the more than Millionaires Tax to him.  Came right out with pen in hand, and cameras rolling to veto a bill which would have removed a tax break for 16,000 of the most wealthy in New Jersey, but would restore much needed dollars to lower and middle class families. So far with Assemblywoman Linda Stender, we have collectively made three trips to his office! We can only guess that in the Governor's world, women are not so welcome, nor is their health care a "priority".  I've asked at least twice for him to correct that impression if indeed he was misquoted.  Guess he wasn't!
Thanks to Jay Lassiter for bringing the video right to the Blue Jersey audience. His chronicles are great!

Today the Assembly will consider the 2% cap "compromise". I know there are those among you who thought some of us should have made more of an issue of this. But I actually think that the Senate President made a pretty good "deal". Truth is that the Governor could have vetoed the 2.9% cap which we passed, reduced it and sent it back with no exceptions, except for debt service and capital expenditures as he first requested. We did get two big cost drivers out of the cap (health and pension payments) and most important, made him back down on his constitutional amendment demand. Do I wish it had been done more in concert with Assembly Speaker Sheila Oliver - yes I do! I've expressed that directly to the Senate President. We need a little more cooperation between the democratic leadership of both houses and a little less ego! Time for a few more joint meetings between the two and more communication! The "term" leadership also includes our two Democratic Majority Leaders. Comon, Guys & Girls, we can't afford so much sniping. We all know who we need to be fighting- and it isn't each other!

Speaking of "who", the Assemblywomen will be taking their turn for a press conference (right outside the Governor's office) this morning on the family planning bill. It will be our fifth one, and each time one of our houses is in session, we will each take our turn until the Governor comes out and either signs or vetoes this important women's health care bill. Thanks to so many of the good democratic guys who came out in support at this past Thursday's press event.

Privatizing government: This is more of the same from the Christie administration. Undermine our public school system, our public employees, our public TV network, and then parcel out government to private industry. Is that like the private industry successes of the Parsons' Adventure or EnCap or Xanadu?  But the most appalling point I read about the report was that the government should get out of the pre-school business and maybe increase class size from an average of 15 to 22. I have not seen the whole report and will today, but if that note is correct, I guess Christie is planning to make one of his campaign comments into a self-fulfilling prophecy - "Pre-School is Baby Sitting!" Then of course, if we privatize government, we can really cut taxes and just charge "user fees" to everyone. You can bet these ideas will be fought by some of us (and I think the majority of us) with full battle gear.

Senate Health Committee meets on Monday, July 19.  We've invited Health Commissioner Dr. Alaigh to meet with us, and we'll have lots of questions on family planning centers and where these women will receive their health care. We'll also be doing a few bills including establishing a commission to oversee policy on the issues and treatment surrounding aphasia which is the speech difficulty resulting from a stroke or traumatic injury. This disability affects thousands of New Jerseyans and needs more spotlight on treatment and support.  

Keep your voices heard!

Senator Loretta Weinberg :: Family Planning, the 2% Cap, Privatiztion - Another Hot Week In New Jersey
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Medical Marijuana (0.00 / 0)
Hi Senator Weiberg,
With Health Commissioner Alaigh I hope you will also press her to move more rapidly on implementing the Medical Marijuana Law. If she needs an amendment that would permit Rutgers and other non Alternative Treatment Centers (ATC'S) to produce the cannabis, such is worth supporting.  It has also been rumored that the state would like hospitals to be the dispenser of marijuana, but few hospitals are likely to be well-equipped or interested so the state is better off sticking with the existing law which calls for the first six ATC's to be non-profit - ideally community-based organizations.  See my diary Medical Marijuana Mess. Dr. Alaigh refers to the law as highly complex and expresses her concern to do it right, but it's not rocket science, and it has already been implemented in 13 states. People with painful, debilitating illnesses have waited long enough.  

"The work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die." - Sen. Ted Kennedy

Thanks BillOrr - (0.00 / 0)
That's one of the reasons Sen. Weinberg hangs out here; she wants to hear what this community is thinking but also what people are willing to do to forward what they're supporting. So, keep that coming.

Ditto to everybody else. You have a state senator reading you who's willing to let you know she's reading you. And there are quite a few who drop in unannounced. What you have to say to them gets to most of them too.

It's not a particularly snappy signature, but here's what I think we need in the next NJ Democratic State Chair.  


[ Parent ]
How about a joint venture? (0.00 / 0)
New Jersey Policy Perspective is the best progressive policy shop in the state.  Blue Jersey is the strongest progressive voice in the state?  DFA-NJ is the best progressive grassroots organization in the state?

Why not bring the three together to develop a progressive policy agenda, advocate for that agenda, and organize progressives to elect legislators in 2011 who will pass that agenda into law?


[ Parent ]
I don't think it's a very bad deal either (0.00 / 0)
and I think it's MUCH better than a constitutional amendment, but let's face it: If Christie vetoed a 2.9% cap, he should have gotten the same 4% cap you guys already passed into law. He can't make you pass a law.  


Frank LoBiondo Record and Jon Runyan Watch

Privatizing Pre-School Will Hurt Our Children... (0.00 / 0)
Commercial day care centers are a business.  Their only reason for existing is to make a profit.    That means trying to hire the least costly "help" possible and it means having as few people working there as possible.   Anything that increases costs reduces profitability.  They only care about the kids to the extent that they don't want to lose the business.  Life is about more than money!!!

I have seen, first hand, the quality effects of the Cliffside park pre school program (on my little cousin).

It's not that the staff level people actually doing private day care are monsters trying to harm the kids....they are mostly very nice people (though woefully underpaid and overworked)........but the fact is that taking care of our pre schoolers and helping them to be prepared for regular school is a function best performed as part of the commonly owned and run and integrated public school framework.  

The Christie agenda is toxic across the board, but this one aspect of turning our little kids into a profit center for the advancement of the Republican ideological business agenda makes my blood boil.

Dear loretta, if we can do nothing else to stop Christie from raping the whole state for the benefit of "private sector" profits....let us PLEASE at least save the children!!!


Commercial Pre-Schools Can Be Good (0.00 / 0)

Nick,

I don't see the situation as being as being so dire.  There are plenty of excellent commercial pre-schools.  The question is how much money (resources) are they being given.  If the commercial pre-school is very inexpensive, they won't have the money to provide a good experience to the kids.   The same goes with non-profit pre-schools.   Personally, I think the debate would be better focused on ensuring that families in need are given the resources to send their kids to a quality preschool, regardless of whether it is commercial or nonprofit.



[ Parent ]
You Miss My Point.... (0.00 / 0)
....to quote your own comment...

" If the commercial pre-school is very inexpensive, they won't have the money to provide a good experience to the kids. "

If the only rationale for commercial pre schools is that they're cheaper than public pre k, then your quote will be borne out...but at what cost to the children?  How many years and "studies" will it take to prove that the Christie policy hurt children?     Why mess with it in the first place?

And if the commercial pre k industry actually spent lots of money to provide a great service (as they probably would in the first year or two. ....then there wouldn't be any significant cost savings.    

The current system "ain't broke and don't need fixin".  If there were stories of systemic waste, failure. incompetence and abuse in the existing system....then there would be a point to changing it.

Obviously, money is only part of the rationale.   The Republican/Christie/Bush agenda is to destroy/minimize unions in general and public sector unions in particular.    The children are pawns in Christie's game.

And yes, since the changes Christie wants have not yet been made......the situation is not dire......yet.  Privatizing pre-k but still making them political plums by awarding contracts in the conventional corrupt pay to play framework is the worst of both worlds...and it's little kids who will pay the price.


[ Parent ]
PS on Motivations.... (0.00 / 0)
Community owned and run pre k is answerable to PARENTS who are voters.   The chain of answer-ability by/to local officials is fairly short and easily yanked.

Once it becomes a contracted service run by a corporation with limited liability that can simply declare bankruptcy and go away....the immediate accountability is reduced.....and it takes a disaster of some kind to hold the hiring officials accountable....but even there, the hiring is the result of an inhuman "bidding process".

The "voucher" system you propose would give the poor (who couldn't afford to supplement the voucher to pay for premium/decent pre k) the cheapest low class "options".    

Sorry, I have seen what a high quality public program looks like and I want THAT level of pre k available to all of New Jersey's kids.

It really all comes down to a matter of ideology and motivations.   Republicans really believe that the highest possible motivation human beings are capable of acting from is personal profit.   Democrats believe that there is a common humanity that we all share and that people have the capacity to do their best when they feel connected to each other as part of a shared community.

Of course that's a gross simplification....but I'm already going on at more length than this forum generally accepts.  :-)


[ Parent ]
It depends on what type of commerical Pre-K it is. (0.00 / 0)

I completely agree that a privatization of existing schools where the government controls which company runs the schools will be a disaster with lots of political patronage.

But a separate system with vouchers and independent commercial schools could work fine.  

Regarding the status quo, where I live, there is no existing system of public pre-K schools, and the commercial preschools seem to work well.   It is not a privatization scheme however.

Lastly, there are lots of ways that a business inclined person can reduce costs in a pre-school without affecting the quality of child-care.   My limited experience with non-profit pre-schools has been they don't have much interest in reducing costs that can be reduced (without affecting care).  The free-market can be a good thing, when properly regulated.


[ Parent ]
Yes, There Are Some Private Operators... (0.00 / 0)
..who will do a great job at a fair cost.   You have had a good personal experience so your view is understandable.  

I can speak from my local experience that the move from private to public was a big improvement for my little cousin.

My concern is that folks with more disposable income will like the voucher system because it allows them to add more cash and hire a better provider.....leaving the rest to deal with the bargain basement operators.     Thereby giving the children of the poor the opposite of a "head start".

In the long run and on the average, I believe the incentives are better with a public program that is well administered.

Self serving greed and taking really good care of other people who aren't in a position to demand good care (children, the sick, the elderly and disabled etc) don't generally mix.  A well run private system is better than a poorly run public one.....that's undeniable.    But I submit that when both are well run that the public system will still be better and cost the same or less since no investors/corporations need to make a profit.


[ Parent ]
Date Correction (0.00 / 0)
The Senate Health Committee is meeting on Monday, July 19, not on the prior Thursday.
Keep the comments coming.

[ Parent ]
Featured Stories

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 Deciminyan
 Hopeful
 Jeff Gardner
 Jersey Jazzman
 KendalJames
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 the_promised_land
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Baristanet
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Channel Surfing
» Deciminyan
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Garden State Grapevine
» ClearysNoteBook
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazzman
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search












Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.



Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
7964 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.
Powered by: SoapBlox