2 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      

Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Party of No goes after its own Research and Development act

by: Hopeful

Fri May 14, 2010 at 09:33:01 AM EDT



One of the late bipartisan achievements of the Bush Administration was the America COMPETES act which aimed to increase research and development funding in certain engineering and science areas, and support science education. The 10-year process of doubling this R&D funding (7% per year) requires a new authorization this year.  (The same kind of increase was done successfully with National Institute of Health funding over the previous decade.)

The 2007 bill so was so bipartisan that every New Jersey Representative voted for it. Frank LoBiondo supported it. Yes, even Scott Garrett supported it.  This is "mom and apple pie" stuff because we know that such government funding is paid back in economic growth. The nations we are competing with are investing heavily even as our private sector abandons basic research.

But that was before the Party of No. Now, the Republicans voted to kill the bill:

House Democrats had to scrap their only substantive bill of the week Thursday after Republicans won a procedural vote that substantively altered the legislation with an anti-porn clause....

But the Republican motion to recommit the bill -- a parliamentary tactic that gives the minority one final chance to amend legislation -- contained language prohibiting federal funds from going "to salaries to those officially disciplined for violations regarding the viewing, downloading, or exchanging of pornography, including child pornography, on a federal computer or while performing official government duties."

That provision scared dozens of Democrats into voting with Republicans to approve the motion to recommit. After it became clear the GOP motion was going to pass, dozens of additional Democrats changed their votes from "no" to "yes." In the end, 121 Democrats voted with Republicans -- only four fewer than the number of Democrats who voted with their party.

Of course the porn thing is just an attempt to sink the very bill these Republicans supported. (Why Democrats worry about this nonsense is beyond me, though to be fair many say Rahm popularized the tactic when Democrats were in the minority.) The Roll Call vote is here. The Republicans don't have an ounce of integrity and are trying to paralyze the government in a time of crisis by even destroying things they support.

ps. If you saw "scared Democrat" and thought John Adler you're right. That's what I predicted we'll see again and again. No other New Jersey Democrat voted for the Republican sham. Remember that this tactic would not work without cowardly Democrats. (Runyan, of course, would be even worse.)  

Hopeful :: Party of No goes after its own Research and Development act
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Shameful (0.00 / 0)
It is shameful that cowardly NJ Democrats, including my Representative Rothman, succumbed to these Republican tactics. It is even more shameful that Republicans would deliberately torpedo a generally bipartisan bill. It is no wonder that congress is held in such low esteem by the public.    

"The work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die." - Sen. Ted Kennedy

If I read the vote right (0.00 / 0)
Rothman, Holt, and the other non-Adler Democrats voted NO which in this context supports the bill.  

Frank LoBiondo Record and Jon Runyan Watch

[ Parent ]
Whoops! (0.00 / 0)
Thanks for pointing that out.  Redemption for the NJ Democrats who voted NO to recommit but a sad performance for many other Democrats and the Republicans who supported this maneuver.  

I assume there is general agreement that normally the government should not support funded individuals using their computers for porn, but this is unnecessary micromanagement for a problem best handled by those who issue the grants and managers of those who receive them. Are future bills to be highjacked by this provision? How about legislators caught using their government computers for porn?

Incidentally, there are occasions when viewing material that some would consider as porn is legitimate, and indeed the definition of porn is vague, which leads to unintended consequences.  HIV prevention, for example, can include explicit art and photos which some would view as porn, but which research has shown to be effective as  a prevention tool. In fact one of the best places to introduce HIV/STD prevention is in porn and men-who-have-sex-with-men chat rooms. Can research and prevention efforts in sex addiction, prostitution, and human trafficking be conducted without reference to porn?    

"The work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die." - Sen. Ted Kennedy


[ Parent ]
yes (0.00 / 0)
There was a porn scandal at NSF -- rather like the SEC one -- but it doesn't have anything to do with the COMPETES act or scientists getting grants, and for that matter probably doesn't require any action by Congress.  

Frank LoBiondo Record and Jon Runyan Watch

[ Parent ]
But: Wait! Wait! (0.00 / 0)
Aren't the NJ TeaBags who post here ON RECORD as being against "Party Of No" as a political mindset?

I'm pretty sure I saw that recently.

As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand.


Are Republicans unpatriotic? (0.00 / 0)
So let me understand this.  The Republicans voted to kill the bill because there are a few bad apples out there downloading porn on government computers.  The GOP is micromanaging an internal agency discipline problem.  And the entire country is being punished for the misdeeds of a few.  What a bunch of [fill in your own word here].

Blog: http://www.deciminyan.org

Featured Stories
Caption Contest: "Numbnuts"
by: Rosi Efthim - Feb 01
9 Comments

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 Deciminyan
 Hopeful
 Jay Lassiter
 Jeff Gardner
 Jersey Jazzman
 KendalJames
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 the_promised_land
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Baristanet
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Daily Newarker
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Garden State Grapevine
» ClearysNoteBook
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazzman
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search












Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.



Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
7743 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.
Powered by: SoapBlox