8 users logged onTips: BlueJerseyDotCom (AIM) |      

Log In
Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Contradictory polls on open space (Public Question 1)

by: Hopeful

Fri Oct 23, 2009 at 10:32:20 AM EDT



There's an interesting new release (PDF) from Eagleton-Rutgers. This is the same poll that had Corzine ahead by three.  Eagleton reports:

New Jersey's $400 million dollar open space bond issue is at risk of failing according to a Rutgers-Eagleton Poll released today. Among likely voters in the November 3 election, 43 percent oppose borrowing for open space while 41 percent support borrowing, a statistical dead heat. Another 16 percent are undecided.

The Rutgers-Eagleton poll results vary dramatically from another recent poll which found 55 percent of likely voters in favor, and only 32 percent opposed. The Rutgers-Eagleton Poll of 583 likely voters has a margin of error of +/- 4.1 percent.

"It is rare to see such significant differences in two polls taken at nearly the same time," said David Redlawsk, director of the Rutgers-Eagleton Poll and professor of political science at Rutgers. "In this case, however, the difference is in the way the question was asked. When voters are cued to the idea that a bond issue means borrowing money they are far less supportive than when simply told that bonds will be issued."

The Rutgers-Eagleton Poll asked the question: "Voters will decide whether New Jersey should borrow $400 million to preserve open space, farmland, and historic areas. Do you plan to vote for or against borrowing this money?" In comparison other polls have simply asked voters whether they support "bonding" for open space without specifying that bonding means borrowing money.

They're referring to the recent Monmouth-Gannett poll.  FDU also found the open space question way ahead (56-32) just a few weeks ago, but they also asked about "bonds" rather than "borrowing."

I was initially surprised that the question was doing so well, because I guessed voters were sick of borrowing, and I remember a Salem County measure actually failing recently. Lonegan has a chance to have an impact here, I think, but I don't pretend to know what will happen. If you're wondering, the Public Question and its interpretative statement have "bond" but not "borrowing."

Hopeful :: Contradictory polls on open space (Public Question 1)
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Fall of American Democracy (4.00 / 1)

It really makes you wonder about the future of our country when you have an increasing number of issues decided by the voters, yet the voters don't really understand what they're voting on.  The decision on the open space question shouldn't rest on whether voters know (or don't know) that bonding is the same as borrowing.


I think it might be human nature (0.00 / 0)
Perhaps, but it may just be the different phrasing triggers different reactions. Bonds are borrowing that invest in the future, "borrowing" is personal overspending.  

It wouldn't surprise me if people disapprove of "borrowing to buy expensive things" and approve of "taking out a mortgage to buy a house."

Humans are not completely rational.

 

Frank LoBiondo Record and Jon Runyan Watch


[ Parent ]
Featured Stories

Hate Ads? Make them disappear.
Subscribe:

Blue Jersey Essentials

 EDITORIAL DIRECTOR
 Rosi Efthim

 STAFF WRITERS
 Adam L a/k/a/ clammyc
 Bill Orr
 Deciminyan
 Hopeful
 Jeff Gardner
 Jersey Jazzman
 KendalJames
 Senator Loretta Weinberg
 the_promised_land
 Rosi Efthim

» About | FAQ | In the News
» 
» Tips:
» Front Page RSS Feed
» User Diaries RSS Feed
» Blue Jersey on Twitter » Blue Jersey on Facebook » Blue Jersey T-shirts
ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Roll

» Alicia Menendez
» Alive and Kickin
» Baristanet
» Blog the Fifth
» Capitol Quickies
» The Center of NJ Life
» Channel Surfing
» Channel Surfing
» Deciminyan
» The Englewood Report
» Frank Lobiondo Record
» Fred Snowflack
» Freedom to Tinker
» Garden State Grapevine
» ClearysNoteBook
» Herb Jackson
» Hoboken Journal
» Hoboken Now
» Jersey Blogs
» Jersey Jazzman
» Middletown Mike
» More Monmouth Musings
» NJ Domestic Partnership
» NJ Politics Unusual
» NJ Voices: Policy Watch
» On Our Radar
» The Opinion Mill
» Other Spaces
» Plainfield Plaintalker
» PolitickerNJ
» Retire Garrett
» Ruins of Trenton
» Senator Ray Lesniak
» Stovetop Diplomacy
» Sustainable Cherry Hill
» The Subversive Garden
» Teaneck Progress
» Trenton Kat
» We Don't Need Permission
» Xpatriated Texan

Cartoons

» M.e. Cohen
» Jimmy Margulies
» Drew Sheneman
» Rob Tornoe
Search




Advanced Search












Ads do not constitute
an endorsement
from Blue Jersey.



Blue Jersey Gear

Visit the Blue Jersey store. T-shirts, bumper stickers & more!


Shirts available in dozens of styles and colors.



Visit the Blue Jersey Store

Contact Us
» Editor: 
» Press releases: 
» Advertising inquiries: 
» Tips:
About Us
» About Blue Jersey
» Blue Jersey in the News
» FAQ/Usage
» 
» RSS Feed

Misc Stuff
» Blue Jersey Radio
» Blue Jersey on Twitter
» Facebook Group
» MySpace Page
» NJ Politics 101 Wiki
» Blue Jersey Podcast
» Screaming Carrot Award
» Contribute to Blue Jersey
7959 satisfied users, visits and 0 subpoenas served since Sept 28, 2005
© Blue Jersey, powered by the mighty SoapBlox.
Powered by: SoapBlox