Redistricting: How Progressives are Saving NJ Democrats from Themselves

It’s official. We’ve reached the point in time when not only was the New Jersey Blue Wave a success, but the bickering has started about who deserves credit. Take this editorial about Norcross’ influence on mail-in ballots, and the response from Action Together NJ that says not so fast. But  the Blue Wave wasn’t just about electing Democrats. For progressives, it was important to elect Democrats and hold those Democrats to progressive values. As New Jersey turns its attention to redistricting, progressives are holding Democrats accountable. And it’s starting to show.

If you want to understand the gerrymandering controversy, check this out. Here’s my take: it would be a mistake to replace our current system — which is one of the best models in the country — with a more political system solely as a power grab.

I’m not the only one saying it. Progressive organizations are loud and clear that this is bad policy, and Democrats risk undermining their position as the party of good governance if they play politics with redistricting.

And now, elected officials are starting to echo that message. Yesterday, newly elected Democratic Congressman Tom Malinowksi wrote:

This is how it should work, whether it’s redistricting, or making sure the minimum wage bill does what it’s supposed to. Progressives work hard to get good candidates elected (often Democrats). Then progressives keep the wave going by shining a light on what can be done better. Too many times in the past, bad policy such as the redistricting effort has happened behind closed doors. It leads to cynicism. It’s bad strategy. And when progressives shine a light on it, they save a party from its own worse inclinations.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *