Housing Investments Create Opportunities for All: Rethink the 2016 NJ Budget

This is the 4th in our 7-week series Rethink the 2016 NJ Budget with Anti-Poverty Network. Arnold is Senior Policy Coordinator for the Housing and Community Development Network (HCDNNJ). Look for posts every Mon & Wed around Noon. Promoted by Rosi.

Rethink the 2016 NJ BudgetThe most densely populated state in the nation is also the most economically diverse. New Jersey is home to some of the wealthiest places as well as some of the poorest. The problem we’re experiencing is that due to our slow economic recovery, the foreclosure crisis, and Superstorm Sandy, a growing number of our residents are finding themselves among the working poor. Sadly, the State isn’t making the crucial investments needed to create more affordable home opportunities.

unnamedNew Jersey has an imbalanced housing market. Luxury rentals and McMansions are plentiful but more modest affordable rentals and starter homes are few and far between. As housing costs outpace wages, demand for affordable homes is soaring, but we are faced with a housing crisis because housing production dollars are being diverted and we are underinvesting in assistance for those who need it.  

The State Rental Assistance Program (SRAP) assists very low-income families, the elderly, and the disabled to afford decent, safe housing. In recent years however, the number of SRAP vouchers have declined due to under-investment despite the increased need. In order to address the housing needs of extremely low-income individuals and individuals with disabilities, SRAP must be funded at a level that will provide the full 5,000 vouchers funded in fiscal year 2011. In addition, Governor Christie has used dollars from the Affordable Housing Trust Fund – which is intended for housing production – to fund SRAP. This has left no money from the State’s fund, which is dedicated for affordable housing to rehabilitate or build new homes low income people can afford. We need to free up money for housing production by funding at least half of SRAP from either the General Fund or a dedicated funding stream to meet a demand that has surpassed supply.

Investments into the SRAP program and affordable home production is an economic driver. When a person is spending more than 30 percent of their income on housing costs, they are unable to spend on activities that spur our economy like going out to dinner, buying clothing, or traveling for example. If less people are going out and spending, patronizing local businesses, it puts jobs in jeopardy. Job cuts result in the need for financial assistance, eventually bringing the problem back full circle.  

According to a study from the National Association of Home Builders, an investment of $25 million dollars means:

  • 1,100 one-time jobs would be created, including both construction jobs and related secondary jobs created as a result.

  • These workers will earn $72 million in total income, and pay $1.6 million in state income taxes.

  • Once the homes are built, they and their residents will generate 200 ongoing jobs, and $220,000 per year in state income taxes.

  • Over 5 years, the state and its localities will realize over $11 million in total sales, income and property tax revenues.

    Funding SRAP and allowing the Affordable Housing Trust Fund to be used for housing production is essential for helping our economy prosper. Every NJ resident should have a quality home they can afford. The State budget should be used for long term planning and it should be a vehicle for making NJ a better place to live and work in; put the money where it should be!

    For additional evidence of the positive economic impact of investment in the production of homes that people can afford, see here, and here.

  • Comments (2)

    1. josef

      We’ve been having this conversation since the Mount Laurel decision 40 years ago. It’s not just that there’s no money in one fund that makes affordable housing hard to find, it’s that up until recently, towns successfully fought to keep affordable housing out of their municipalities. Or rich towns paid poorer towns to take their affordable housing requirement (for instance, Camden has 3,000 more affordable housing units than is required of it by law). Thankfully, this isn’t allowed anymore, so we at least have a chance of desegregating the poor away from the wealthy, as has been the custom in New Jersey since the middle of the 20th century. That’s the only real chance we have at building equitable communities.

      Reply
    2. Serena Rice

      I agree with Joseph that the implementation of Mount Laurel is crucial to addressing affordable housing in NJ (and its location in areas of opportunity), but so is funding. One of the many reasons that housing is not being built and rented at affordable prices, despite the clear evidence of a growing market for this housing, is because it is not economically viable without subsidies. Real money, available to meet this real need, is a vital part of the equation.

      Reply

    Leave a Comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *