An Air-brushed State of the City Address in Camden

Cross-posted from the Local Knowledge Blog.

“Air-brushing” Camden – DAMN – that’s the perfect phrase. Thanks, Stephen, for this post about what the Christie administration and official and corporate Camden refuse to give a damn about. THIS POST is what they should be reading. – Rosi

No matter how skeptical I am walking into the building, the shark room in the Camden Aquarium always takes my breath away. It’s majestic. It gives any event a little gravity. Not that the Cooper’s Ferry Annual Meeting, featuring the mayor’s State of the City Address, needed more pomp and circumstance. It had every Camden dignitary, politician, potential developer or cheerleader possible (and they were all thanked more than once). But the meeting made me sad. It made me sad because it was a dishonest conversation about Camden. The Narrative (with a capital N) was that everything is fixed, everything is getting better, everything is hopeful. But to make that case, the speakers had to hide the real Camden, the one I know and love. I long for the day that we can stand in front of developers and tell them about Camden as we know it, not about a 5 block radius of downtown, and talk about Camden’s diversity and history as assets, not something to sweep under the rug. I walked into the aquarium wanting to hear a pitch for Camden that asked people to be a part of what was already here, not pine about a mythical shining city that fails to resemble the city we live in.

A friend joked that the first speaker, Lt. Gov. Kim Guadagno, brought the speech for another city, and accidentally got it mixed up with Camden’s. Her speech didn’t change much from last year, still using the gimmick of giving away her phone number. But this year the speech took on a particular mission accomplished tone that even George W. Bush would blush at.

Here were a few of the most dubious claims (all paraphrased):

  • She claimed she went to her community in Monmouth County to say if Camden could turn around, so could they.
  • She claimed the Camden revival was complete, but if we there was anything she’d missed, we should just give her a call.
  • She told developers they should have bought property five years ago, because now all the prices were going up.
  • She said there was no more housing in the city because so many folks were moving here.

    I call this Manhattan Syndrome, an affliction causing folks to refer to the downtown as the entire city, saying New York City instead of Manhattan, Philadelphia instead of Center City, and talking about Camden as if it was only the downtown and waterfront.

    If the Lt. Gov. had taken literally a step out of downtown, she would have seen a different Camden, one that struggles with blight, abandoned homes, and serious poverty. To discuss a mission accomplished while ignoring this reality was shocking and revealing.

    Mayor Dana Redd’s State of the City took a different tack. The speech emphasized all the key points of the Narrative. Education is being solved by new Renaissance schools. Jobs are being created by new companies receiving tax credits. Safety is addressed by the new Metro Police.

    I’ve expressed concerns about these policies plenty of times on this blog. But I want to express my concern now about the Narrative. And that’s because the Camden being spoken about at this meeting is different then the Camden I experience when I go to church in Cramer Hill, or stop by a friend’s house in Waterfront South, or talk to a teacher at Camden High.

    The Narrative has an incessant need to airbrush Camden.

    A walk down Broadway shows that the city is still on her knees; the street is a remnant of a once-thriving corridor, now crowned by a library that has a tree growing through its roof. Even the Waterfront, with all of its aquariums and baseball stadiums and performing venues, is empty most days, and is littered with parking lots once promised to be high rises.

    Ignoring that Camden is dishonest. Pretending that there is a housing shortage, or a property shortage, while thousands of properties remain blighted, and hundreds of properties are slated for demolition adding to the plethora of empty lots already in the city, is also a mistake.

    It’s a mistake because it promises people a city that isn’t here, and keeps people from appreciating the one that actually exists.



    Corporations that come to Camden build campuses. They do not want to engage with their neighborhoods, so they build a fence, build a cafeteria, provide vans from Patco to the office, anything to set themselves apart from the city. And part of the reason for that is because they do not come here to be a part of the real Camden. The Cooper Annual Meeting could be an opportunity to introduce people to that Camden. Instead, it’s a dog and pony show that hides diversity and poverty behind a sterile waterfront.

    Imagine if we sold this city based on the potential of its old main streets. If we told corporations they could move in, and have Dominican or Puerto Rican food for lunch, and soul food for dinner. Buy their Valentine’s Day flowers from a locally-owned flower shop, and their whiskey from a locally-owned distillery. Imagine if the companies that came here wanted to be a part of the Camden we know and love, not a sterile waterfront set apart from the rest of the city.

    Imagine the type of people that would attract.

    Tonight, after the State of the City, I drove with a dozen or so friends to East Camden. We met for dinner at Freddy’s, ate Mufongo, goat stew, beans and rice, and talked about the city we all are in various stages of getting to know. There were folks from South Jersey, Philadelphia, downtown Camden, and other Camden neighborhoods. There were folks who’d held political office in Camden, academics, students, and millennials. But what drew them was the neighborhoods, the dives, the mystique of Camden’s history and the remnants of its dignity and majesty. What drew them was the quirks and beauty of the city’s neighborhoods and its people.

    What if we had an honest conversation about what’s here? What if we actually discussed the challenges in Camden City? And what if we shared the reasons we love it anyway?

    Yesterday, I sat and listened to a white-washed, sterile Camden narrative and couldn’t help but wonder what would happen if we introduced people to the city I know and love. You know, the one that’s actually here.  

  • Comments (4)

    1. josef

      “Imagine if we sold this city based on the potential of its old main streets. If we told corporations they could move in, and have Dominican or Puerto Rican food for lunch, and soul food for dinner. Buy their Valentine’s Day flowers from a locally-owned flower shop, and their whiskey from a locally-owned distillery. Imagine if the companies that came here wanted to be a part of the Camden we know and love, not a sterile waterfront set apart from the rest of the city.”

      And you know what, I think that even some of the employees, if not most, of the companies coming in WANT that Camden. I think that if you polled them (and I would love if we could engage every single one of these new employees coming into the city), most of them would want what you suggest. I strongly believe the young people coming to work at separated, cordoned off places like the Ferry Terminal Building don’t want a sterile drive-in, drive-out work experience. They want a vibrant, interesting, dynamic city, and I think they’re very apt to support local businesses, if only they were located near them and not across a vast ocean of parking from them.

      Reply
    2. Thetruth

      Recently the Camden Courier Post ran an article entitled “Workers adjust to Camden”.

      Below is a comment of one of the new workers:

      “I must say I had a few minor concerns initially,” says Dave Quaker, an employee at Webimax, a website services company that recently moved its offices from Mount Laurel.

      “But we’re on the Waterfront, too. We’re not in ‘Camden.’ ”

      This is the mentality of the City, County, and State. This is how they sell the waterfront.  The rest of the city is in ruins and poor.

      http://www.courierpostonline.c

      Reply

    Leave a Comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *