New Jersey, the Iraq War, What We’ve Lost & the President’s Speech Ending it All

President Obama’s remarks today announcing a drawdown – to zero – of American troop presence in Iraq is not directly New Jersey news.

But more than 100 people with ties to New Jersey have died in the allied wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. And at least 539 New Jerseyans died at the World Trade Center attack tied to both wars. For them, for NJ soldiers deployed in Iraq and veterans of 2 wars there, and for the $40 billion spent by NJ on the Iraq War, here is the speech ostensibly ending it, from the President:

From the White House:



James S. Brady Press Briefing Room

12:49 P.M. EDT

    THE PRESIDENT:  Good afternoon, everybody.  As a candidate for President, I pledged to bring the war in Iraq to a responsible end — for the sake of our national security and to strengthen American leadership around the world.  After taking office, I announced a new strategy that would end our combat mission in Iraq and remove all of our troops by the end of 2011.

Speech concludes after the jump.

As Commander-in-Chief, ensuring the success of this strategy has been one of my highest national security priorities.  Last year, I announced the end to our combat mission in Iraq.  And to date, we’ve removed more than 100,000 troops.  Iraqis have taken full responsibility for their country’s security.

A few hours ago I spoke with Iraqi Prime Minister Maliki.  I reaffirmed that the United States keeps its commitments.  He spoke of the determination of the Iraqi people to forge their own future.  We are in full agreement about how to move forward.

So today, I can report that, as promised, the rest of our troops in Iraq will come home by the end of the year.  After nearly nine years, America’s war in Iraq will be over.

Over the next two months, our troops in Iraq — tens of thousands of them — will pack up their gear and board convoys for the journey home.  The last American soldier[s] will cross the border out of Iraq with their heads held high, proud of their success, and knowing that the American people stand united in our support for our troops.  That is how America’s military efforts in Iraq will end.

But even as we mark this important milestone, we’re also moving into a new phase in the relationship between the United States and Iraq.  As of January 1st, and in keeping with our Strategic Framework Agreement with Iraq, it will be a normal relationship between sovereign nations, an equal partnership based on mutual interests and mutual respect.

In today’s conversation, Prime Minister Maliki and I agreed that a meeting of the Higher Coordinating Committee of the Strategic Framework Agreement will convene in the coming weeks.  And I invited the Prime Minister to come to the White House in December, as we plan for all the important work that we have to do together.  This will be a strong and enduring partnership.  With our diplomats and civilian advisors in the lead, we’ll help Iraqis strengthen institutions that are just, representative and accountable.  We’ll build new ties of trade and of commerce, culture and education, that unleash the potential of the Iraqi people.  We’ll partner with an Iraq that contributes to regional security and peace, just as we insist that other nations respect Iraq’s sovereignty.

    As I told Prime Minister Maliki, we will continue discussions on how we might help Iraq train and equip its forces — again, just as we offer training and assistance to countries around the world.  After all, there will be some difficult days ahead for Iraq, and the United States will continue to have an interest in an Iraq that is stable, secure and self-reliant.  Just as Iraqis have persevered through war, I’m confident that they can build a future worthy of their history as a cradle of civilization.

    Here at home, the coming months will be another season of homecomings.  Across America, our servicemen and women will be reunited with their families.  Today, I can say that our troops in Iraq will definitely be home for the holidays.

This December will be a time to reflect on all that we’ve been though in this war.  I’ll join the American people in paying tribute to the more than 1 million Americans who have served in Iraq.  We’ll honor our many wounded warriors and the nearly 4,500 American patriots — and their Iraqi and coalition partners — who gave their lives to this effort.

And finally, I would note that the end of war in Iraq reflects a larger transition.  The tide of war is receding.  The drawdown in Iraq allowed us to refocus our fight against al Qaeda and achieve major victories against its leadership — including Osama bin Laden.  Now, even as we remove our last troops from Iraq, we’re beginning to bring our troops home from Afghanistan, where we’ve begun a transition to Afghan security in leadership.  When I took office, roughly 180,000 troops were deployed in both these wars.  And by the end of this year that number will be cut in half, and make no mistake:  It will continue to go down.

Meanwhile, yesterday marked the definitive end of the Qaddafi regime in Libya.  And there, too, our military played a critical role in shaping a situation on the ground in which the Libyan people can build their own future.  Today, NATO is working to bring this successful mission to a close.

So to sum up, the United States is moving forward from a position of strength.  The long war in Iraq will come to an end by the end of this year.  The transition in Afghanistan is moving forward, and our troops are finally coming home.  As they do, fewer deployments and more time training will help keep our military the very best in the world.  And as we welcome home our newest veterans, we’ll never stop working to give them and their families the care, the benefits and the opportunities that they have earned.

This includes enlisting our veterans in the greatest challenge that we now face as a nation — creating opportunity and jobs in this country.  Because after a decade of war, the nation that we need to build — and the nation that we will build — is our own; an America that sees its economic strength restored just as we’ve restored our leadership around the globe.

Thank you very much.

Comments (13)

  1. Rosi Efthim (Post author)

    And by the way, on behalf of the 100 or so New Jerseyans who died in the Iraq War, you Mission Accomplished, next thing could be a mushroom cloud, absolute certainty of weapons of mass destruction, write blank checks to Halliburton asshole, go to Hell.  

  2. Bill Orr
  3. Alex

    There are wars that are thrust upon a nation so that its way of life can continue. To hear the rhetoric leading up to the invasion of Iraq, you might have thought that was the case here. Unless, of course, you thought for yourself, saw the absence of justification, were suspicious of the relentless drumbeat of war, and realized early on that this foreign adventure was a horrible mistake.

    And what a costly and tragic mistake it truly turned out to be as we look back on the past nine years. A lot has been said about the terrible costs born by the US in the form of American lives and treasure during those years. All those young lives lost. All the schools, research into curing disease, or transportation networks that could have been built right here with that treasure.

    But what about the tremendous loss of Iraqi lives (in the 100s of thousands at least)? What about the way in which the war only only served to further tilt the balance of economic power in favor of corporations that have coopted government to do their bidding? What about the fact that we have only further cemented our reputation throughout the world as a warmonger country, a country that is far too quick to shoot first and analyze and understand (assuming we ever bother too) much later, after the damage has been done?

    I fear the last nine years will be the point at which future historians mark the decline in American prosperity and growth, when this country completely turned its back on its internal socioeconomic problems and instead focused on external wars of choice, all why asking even less of its most prosperous citizens and corporate entities. I say this because I don’t really believe most Americans have learned anything from the terrible and senseless loss resulting from this war. They will go on refusing to understand the world outside our borders, thinking that we are entitled to a grossly disproportionate share of the world’s resources, believing that they need never bear the cost of wars fought with expensive state-of-the art weapons far from our borders, continuing to blindly worship at the altar of unfettered and unregulated capitalism, and blaming the poor and working class for why this country is so indebted. That is the legacy of the Iraq War. It’s hard to reflect on it and on how little we’ve actually learned from it without being very pessimistic about this country’s future.

  4. David Hungerford

    The president’s statement implies that Iraq will still be closely subject to the dictates of Washington. A few days ago there was an announcement that a US/British/Italian consortium would invest $100 billion in Iraq’s oil fields. Also there will be 4 to 5 thousand military “contractors” stationed at the U.S. embassy in Baghdad.

    War over? I’ll believe is when I see it. Also, Bill is right to remember the countless Iraqis who died.

  5. gary stein

    but this rat is still serving

  6. Bertin Lefkovic

    …he had some help in this debacle, particularly from more than a few Democrats.  They deserve a “GO TO HELL” too, especially since most of them are deluded enough to believe in one.

    But if I am the one who is wrong about that and there is a heaven as well, Paul Wellstone is probably up there as we speak, saying “I TOLD YOU F’ERS SO!!!”

  7. Rosi Efthim (Post author)

    But it was a Bush operation, and Bush pals got rich off us. Big-time, as the real asshole behind the operation was fond of saying.

    That in no way excuses the Democrats. Looking at you, Rob Andrews, only New Jersey sponsor of the (that’s you in the corner of this picture standing behind Bush on weapons of mass destruction.

    Not your finest hour.  

  8. Rosi Efthim (Post author)
  9. Bertin Lefkovic

    …Bush, Cheney, et al are indeed assholes, as are most Republicans, but in a democratic republic such as ours, there is nothing to prevent assholes like them and the ones that come before them and the ones that will follow them from running for office and being elected by fellow assholes, the only people who can prevent them from doing as much damage as they can do are Democrats, who don’t, because they are even bigger assholes, because they are not supposed to be assholes at all.

    This is why I have less of a problem with Chris Christie being an asshole than I do with George Norcross, Steve Sweeney, Steve Adubato, and Sheila Oliver being assholes and why I have less of a problem with Bush, Cheney, et al being assholes than I do with Ralph Nader, Rob Andrews, et al being assholes.

    Dick Nixon and Ronald Reagan did a lot of damage while they were President, but they did not do nearly as much damage as they could have done, because to a lesser degree, they were not nearly as big of assholes as Bush, Cheney, and the Republicans of today, but to a greater degree, they faced a significant amount of resistance from Democrats who had the guts to be Democrats, regardless of how the next election might turn out.

    So while I do agree that Bush, Cheney, et al should go to Hell if there is one, I think that there should be a special place there for Democrats who enable Republicans to be all the asshole that they can be, because they are the ultimate assholes, while Democrats like Wellstone, Ann Richards, and Molly Ivins (and Howard Dean and Russ Feingold, of course, when their time comes) will have no choice but to be very lonely in their special place in Heaven.

  10. jeffpickens

    Even after the military withdraws (and I’ll believe that when I see it), the contractors mercenaries are staying. War profiteering continues without the war.

  11. mmgth

    Jeez, you said assholes 12 times though I take your point of course.

  12. Bertin Lefkovic

    BLAME HER!!!!!

  13. Rosi Efthim (Post author)

    And the largest embassy in the history of the world, at a cost in the billions billed to the U.S. taxpayers. About the size of Vatican City, 10 times larger than any other embassy of the U.S. and spreading out over 104 heavily-guarded acres, more than 10,000 Americans will be there. For a very long time.  


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *